Cybersecurity · head to head
IVPN vs Teleport
IVPN
Cybersecurity
Privacy-focused VPN with anonymous account numbers instead of email signup
- From
- $6/month
- Rated
- -

Teleport
Cybersecurity
Certificate-based access to servers, Kubernetes, databases and apps, replacing shared credentials and VPNs
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IVPN has no free tier, unlike several consumer VPN competitors with limited free plans.; Teleport pricing is not published and is described as active users plus protected resources, so an autoscaling estate cannot forecast the bill and finance teams discover the true cost only after the first true-up.
- They diverge on capability: IVPN covers Anonymous account numbers, Teleport covers Short-lived certificates.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IVPN and Teleport actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IVPN
- Anonymous account numbers
- Multi-hop connections
- Independent audits
- WireGuard and OpenVPN support
- AntiTracker
Only in Teleport
- Short-lived certificates
- Protocol coverage
- Session recording and replay
- Access Requests
- Device Trust
- Identity provider integration
- Machine identity
- FIPS and FedRAMP builds
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IVPN
- Signing up for a VPN without providing an email addressnot Teleport
- Verifying a VPN's no-logs claims via independent auditsnot Teleport
- Layering multi-hop routing for higher-anonymity browsingnot Teleport
- Blocking trackers and ads via built-in AntiTrackernot Teleport
Teleport
- Removing long-lived SSH keys and shared database passwords so that offboarding an engineer takes one action in the identity providernot IVPN
- Producing session recordings and per-user database audit trails as direct evidence for SOC 2 or FedRAMPnot IVPN
- Giving contractors or on-call engineers time-boxed, approved access to production instead of standing admin rightsnot IVPN
- Replacing a flat VPN with per-resource authorisation across servers, Kubernetes and internal web appsnot IVPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IVPN
- Has no free tier, unlike several consumer VPN competitors with limited free plans.
- Standard plan's two-connection limit is lower than many rivals offering five or more devices.
- Smaller server network than large mainstream VPN providers, which can limit streaming unblocking.
- Pricing is higher than budget VPN competitors for comparable simultaneous-connection counts.
Teleport
- Pricing is not published and is described as active users plus protected resources, so an autoscaling estate cannot forecast the bill and finance teams discover the true cost only after the first true-up.
- The proxy is a hard dependency on reaching production, so it needs its own high availability deployment and a tested break-glass path or an outage in Teleport becomes an outage in your ability to respond to outages.
- The open source Community Edition omits Access Requests, Device Trust and the FIPS builds, which are exactly the controls an auditor asks about, so the free tier rarely survives a compliance review.
- Self-hosting means running and upgrading a certificate authority and its backing store, and Teleport releases frequently enough that upgrade work becomes a standing operational commitment.
- Coverage across protocols is uneven in depth, so teams with legacy systems, unusual databases or bespoke network appliances find gaps that still require the old VPN to remain in place alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
IVPN
$6/month- Standard$6/month
- 2 simultaneous connections
- $60/year billed annually
- WireGuard and OpenVPN support
- Pro$10/month
- 7 simultaneous connections
- Multi-hop connections
- $100/year billed annually
Teleport
On request- Teleport Community Edition$undefined/year
- Open source, self-hosted
- SSH, Kubernetes, database and app access
- Session recording
- Teleport Enterprise$undefined/year
- Cloud-hosted or self-hosted
- Access Requests and approval workflow
- Device Trust and hardware key enforcement
Which should you pick?
Choose IVPN if
- You need anonymous account numbers.
- You work on windows, mac, linux, ios, android.
- You also want multi-hop connections.
Choose Teleport if
- You need short-lived certificates.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want protocol coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is IVPN or Teleport better?
- Neither clearly leads. IVPN starts at $6/month and Teleport at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IVPN or Teleport?
- IVPN starts at $6/month and Teleport at On request.
- Does IVPN or Teleport run on more platforms?
- IVPN runs on windows, mac, linux, ios, android. Teleport runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- What is IVPN best used for?
- IVPN is most often used for signing up for a vpn without providing an email address, verifying a vpn's no-logs claims via independent audits, layering multi-hop routing for higher-anonymity browsing, blocking trackers and ads via built-in antitracker. Of those, signing up for a vpn without providing an email address and verifying a vpn's no-logs claims via independent audits are not what Teleport is typically brought in for.
- What can IVPN do that Teleport cannot?
- IVPN covers Anonymous account numbers, Multi-hop connections, Independent audits, WireGuard and OpenVPN support. Teleport covers Short-lived certificates, Protocol coverage, Session recording and replay, Access Requests.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Teleport: Is the open source edition usable in production?
Yes, but it lacks Access Requests, Device Trust and FIPS builds, which most compliance programmes end up requiring.
Teleport: How is it priced?
Not publicly. The vendor prices on active users and protected resources and provides a quote after a sales conversation.
Teleport: What happens if Teleport goes down?
Nobody reaches the resources behind it, so you need a highly available deployment and a documented break-glass procedure.
Teleport: Does it replace our VPN?
For anything you put behind it, yes. Legacy systems and appliances it does not support will keep the VPN alive.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IVPN vs Mullvad VPN
- IVPN vs Private Internet Access
- IVPN vs NordVPN
- IVPN vs TunnelBear
- IVPN vs ExpressVPN
- IVPN vs ProtonVPN
- IVPN vs Enpass
- IVPN vs Surfshark
- IVPN vs Avast One
- IVPN vs Windscribe
- IVPN vs Osano
- IVPN vs Wireshark
- IVPN vs WorkOS
- IVPN vs Zscaler Internet Access
- IVPN vs Milestone XProtect
- IVPN vs Proton Mail
- IVPN vs CyberGhost VPN
- IVPN vs JumpCloud
- IVPN vs HashiCorp Vault
- IVPN vs HashiCorp Boundary
- IVPN vs Beyond Identity
- IVPN vs Falco
- IVPN vs Delinea
- IVPN vs Sysdig
- IVPN vs BeyondTrust
- IVPN vs One Identity
- IVPN vs Doppler
- IVPN vs Infisical
- IVPN vs Akeyless
- IVPN vs DataGrail
- IVPN vs Envysion
- IVPN vs Feedzai
- Teleport vs Mullvad VPN
- Teleport vs Private Internet Access
- Teleport vs NordVPN
- Teleport vs TunnelBear
- Teleport vs ExpressVPN
- Teleport vs ProtonVPN
- Teleport vs Enpass
- Teleport vs Surfshark
- Teleport vs Avast One
- Teleport vs Windscribe
- Teleport vs Osano
- Teleport vs Wireshark
- Teleport vs WorkOS
- Teleport vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Teleport vs Milestone XProtect
- Teleport vs Proton Mail
- Teleport vs CyberGhost VPN
- Teleport vs JumpCloud
- Teleport vs HashiCorp Vault
- Teleport vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Teleport vs Beyond Identity
- Teleport vs Falco
- Teleport vs Delinea
- Teleport vs Sysdig
- Teleport vs BeyondTrust
- Teleport vs One Identity
- Teleport vs Doppler
- Teleport vs Infisical
- Teleport vs Akeyless
- Teleport vs DataGrail
- Teleport vs Envysion
- Teleport vs Feedzai
