Softwr

Healthcare · head to head

Rx30 vs Sectra

Rx30 logo

Rx30

Healthcare

Long-established pharmacy management system for independents and small chains

From
On request
Rated
-
Sectra logo

Sectra

Healthcare

Enterprise imaging and PACS from a Swedish vendor that also sells the pathology and cardiology modules on one platform

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Rx30 shares ownership with PioneerRx, so the two are not the independent alternatives a shortlist implies, and roadmap priorities are set centrally; Sectra sectra does not make scanners, so it cannot cross-subsidise software against modality hardware the way an integrated manufacturer can, and it often loses on headline price in a bundled tender.
  • They diverge on capability: Rx30 covers Prescription processing, Sectra covers Sectra IDS7.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Rx30 and Sectra actually diverge.

Attributes where Rx30 and Sectra differ
AttributeRx30Sectra
PlatformsWindows, WebWindows, Web, Cloud, On-premise

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Rx30

  • Prescription processing
  • Claims adjudication
  • Inventory and purchasing
  • Point of sale
  • Delivery management
  • Clinical documentation

Only in Sectra

  • Sectra IDS7
  • Digital pathology module
  • Sectra VNA
  • Sectra UniView
  • Image Exchange Portal
  • Sectra Amplifier
  • Breast imaging workflow
  • Sectra One Cloud

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Rx30

  • Independent pharmacies and small chains wanting a mature, widely-supported systemnot Sectra
  • Operations relying on a broad set of wholesaler and PBM interfacesnot Sectra
  • Pharmacies with significant front-end retail alongside dispensingnot Sectra
  • Multi-store independents needing consistency across locationsnot Sectra

Sectra

  • A hospital group digitising histopathology that does not want a second image archive and a second integration project alongside radiologynot Rx30
  • A regional health service replacing several departmental PACS with one archive and one clinician viewernot Rx30
  • An imaging provider moving off a capital refresh cycle to a cloud subscription with predictable annual costnot Rx30
  • A trust that needs to send and receive studies with neighbouring organisations routinely, where the Image Exchange Portal is already the regional normnot Rx30

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Rx30

  • Shares ownership with PioneerRx, so the two are not the independent alternatives a shortlist implies, and roadmap priorities are set centrally
  • The interface shows its age against newer entrants, and this is the most common objection in demonstrations
  • Pricing is not published, and total cost including hardware and interfaces needs to be requested explicitly
  • Windows-centric, with a cloud story less developed than newer competitors
  • US-only, tied to US insurance and regulatory requirements

Sectra

  • Sectra does not make scanners, so it cannot cross-subsidise software against modality hardware the way an integrated manufacturer can, and it often loses on headline price in a bundled tender.
  • Diagnostic AI is not built in house; Amplifier orchestrates third party algorithms, so the algorithms themselves need separate licences, separate clinical validation and separate information governance sign off.
  • Sectra One Cloud is priced against a committed annual study volume, and organisations whose imaging activity grows faster than forecast meet overage charges partway through the term.
  • The pathology module assumes you have already solved slide scanning and laboratory workflow, which is the larger and more expensive part of digitising histopathology and is not in Sectra scope.
  • Depth of Epic and Oracle Health integration varies by region and by which modules you buy, so a reference site in Sweden is a weak predictor of what integration will cost a United States buyer.

Pricing, plan by plan

Rx30

On request
  • Rx30$undefined/month
    • Prescription processing
    • Claims adjudication
    • Inventory

Sectra

On request
  • Sectra Enterprise Imaging$undefined/year
    • Perpetual licence plus annual maintenance, or Sectra One Cloud subscription
    • Priced on committed annual study volume and modules selected
    • Pathology, cardiology and ophthalmology licensed as separate modules

Which should you pick?

Choose Rx30 if

  • You need prescription processing.
  • You work on Windows, Web.
  • You also want claims adjudication.

Choose Sectra if

  • You need sectra ids7.
  • You work on Windows, Web, Cloud, On-premise.
  • You also want digital pathology module.

Questions people ask

Is Rx30 or Sectra better?
Neither clearly leads. Rx30 starts at On request and Sectra at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Rx30 or Sectra?
Rx30 starts at On request and Sectra at On request.
Does Rx30 or Sectra run on more platforms?
Rx30 runs on Windows, Web. Sectra runs on Windows, Web, Cloud, On-premise.
What is Rx30 best used for?
Rx30 is most often used for independent pharmacies and small chains wanting a mature, widely-supported system, operations relying on a broad set of wholesaler and pbm interfaces, pharmacies with significant front-end retail alongside dispensing, multi-store independents needing consistency across locations. Of those, independent pharmacies and small chains wanting a mature, widely-supported system and operations relying on a broad set of wholesaler and pbm interfaces are not what Sectra is typically brought in for.
What can Rx30 do that Sectra cannot?
Rx30 covers Prescription processing, Claims adjudication, Inventory and purchasing, Point of sale. Sectra covers Sectra IDS7, Digital pathology module, Sectra VNA, Sectra UniView.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Rx30: Is Rx30 the same company as PioneerRx?

Both are owned by RedSail Technologies. They are sold as separate products to overlapping markets, but roadmap decisions sit with one company, which is worth knowing before treating them as independent options.

Sectra: Does Sectra include diagnostic AI?

No. Sectra Amplifier is a marketplace and orchestration layer for third party algorithms, each licensed and validated separately.

Rx30: What does it cost?

Not published. Request the total including hardware, interfaces and training rather than the monthly software fee.

Sectra: Is pathology really on the same platform as radiology?

Yes, the pathology module uses the same archive and workflow engine, which is the main reason buyers digitising histopathology shortlist Sectra.

Rx30: Why do pharmacies stay on it?

Installed base maturity. The interfaces to wholesalers, PBMs and hardware are long established, and those are the things that quietly stop a pharmacy working when they break.

Sectra: How is Sectra One Cloud priced?

On committed annual study volume plus the modules selected, as a subscription rather than a capital purchase. The vendor does not publish rates.

Rx30: How does it compare to PioneerRx?

PioneerRx is more aggressively developed around clinical services. Rx30 has the larger legacy base and broader front-end retail heritage. Same owner, different emphasis.

Sectra: Is Sectra CE marked and FDA cleared?

The diagnostic viewing software carries CE marking under the medical device regulation and FDA 510(k) clearance for diagnostic interpretation, but the exact cleared indications differ per module and per market, so confirm for pathology specifically.

Rx30: Is it suitable for a small chain?

Yes, and that is one of its stronger cases. Multi-store consistency is better handled here than by the systems aimed purely at single independents.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads