Softwr

Healthcare · head to head

Gleamer vs Rx30

Gleamer logo

Gleamer

Healthcare

CE marked and FDA cleared imaging AI suite for bone trauma and chest, now owned by RadNet

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Rx30 logo

Rx30

Healthcare

Long-established pharmacy management system for independents and small chains

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Gleamer radNet, an imaging provider that competes with many independent Gleamer customers, now owns the company and also owns the competing DeepHealth AI portfolio, so roadmap and pricing priorities are an open question for non-RadNet buyers.; Rx30 shares ownership with PioneerRx, so the two are not the independent alternatives a shortlist implies, and roadmap priorities are set centrally
  • They diverge on capability: Gleamer covers BoneView, Rx30 covers Prescription processing.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Gleamer and Rx30 actually diverge.

Attributes where Gleamer and Rx30 differ
AttributeGleamerRx30
PlatformsWeb, Cloud, On-premiseWindows, Web

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Gleamer

  • BoneView
  • ChestView
  • BoneAge
  • BoneMetrics
  • LungCT and BoneCT
  • BreastView
  • Pixyl.Neuro
  • Gleamer Copilot

Only in Rx30

  • Prescription processing
  • Claims adjudication
  • Inventory and purchasing
  • Point of sale
  • Delivery management
  • Clinical documentation

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Gleamer

  • An emergency department where junior doctors read plain films before radiology review and missed fractures are a recurring incident themenot Rx30
  • An urgent care network standardising musculoskeletal reading quality across sites with variable radiology covernot Rx30
  • A paediatric service automating bone age assessment to remove a slow manual atlas comparisonnot Rx30
  • An orthopaedic service that needs automated limb alignment and measurement before surgical planning rather than manual measurement on the workstationnot Rx30

Rx30

  • Independent pharmacies and small chains wanting a mature, widely-supported systemnot Gleamer
  • Operations relying on a broad set of wholesaler and PBM interfacesnot Gleamer
  • Pharmacies with significant front-end retail alongside dispensingnot Gleamer
  • Multi-store independents needing consistency across locationsnot Gleamer

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Gleamer

  • RadNet, an imaging provider that competes with many independent Gleamer customers, now owns the company and also owns the competing DeepHealth AI portfolio, so roadmap and pricing priorities are an open question for non-RadNet buyers.
  • The measured benefit is largest for less experienced readers, so a specialist musculoskeletal service will see far less improvement than the published reader studies suggest.
  • Cleared indications differ per module and per market, and the FDA cleared set is narrower than the CE marked European set, so an American buyer cannot rely on European reference sites.
  • Each additional module adds alert volume into the same worklist, and departments running several Gleamer algorithms report needing local threshold tuning to keep radiologist trust.
  • Pricing is per exam and not published, which makes budgeting difficult for an emergency department whose plain film volume swings seasonally.

Rx30

  • Shares ownership with PioneerRx, so the two are not the independent alternatives a shortlist implies, and roadmap priorities are set centrally
  • The interface shows its age against newer entrants, and this is the most common objection in demonstrations
  • Pricing is not published, and total cost including hardware and interfaces needs to be requested explicitly
  • Windows-centric, with a cloud story less developed than newer competitors
  • US-only, tied to US insurance and regulatory requirements

Pricing, plan by plan

Gleamer

On request
  • Gleamer Copilot$undefined/year
    • Priced per exam analysed or as an annual volume subscription
    • Modules licensed individually or bundled as Copilot
    • Cleared and CE marked indication differs per module and per market

Rx30

On request
  • Rx30$undefined/month
    • Prescription processing
    • Claims adjudication
    • Inventory

Which should you pick?

Choose Gleamer if

  • You need boneview.
  • You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
  • You also want chestview.
Gleamer review

Choose Rx30 if

  • You need prescription processing.
  • You work on Windows, Web.
  • You also want claims adjudication.
Rx30 review

Questions people ask

Is Gleamer or Rx30 better?
Neither clearly leads. Gleamer starts at On request and Rx30 at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Gleamer or Rx30?
Gleamer starts at On request and Rx30 at On request.
Does Gleamer or Rx30 run on more platforms?
Gleamer runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise. Rx30 runs on Windows, Web.
What is Gleamer best used for?
Gleamer is most often used for an emergency department where junior doctors read plain films before radiology review and missed fractures are a recurring incident theme, an urgent care network standardising musculoskeletal reading quality across sites with variable radiology cover, a paediatric service automating bone age assessment to remove a slow manual atlas comparison, an orthopaedic service that needs automated limb alignment and measurement before surgical planning rather than manual measurement on the workstation. Of those, an emergency department where junior doctors read plain films before radiology review and missed fractures are a recurring incident theme and an urgent care network standardising musculoskeletal reading quality across sites with variable radiology cover are not what Rx30 is typically brought in for.
What can Gleamer do that Rx30 cannot?
Gleamer covers BoneView, ChestView, BoneAge, BoneMetrics. Rx30 covers Prescription processing, Claims adjudication, Inventory and purchasing, Point of sale.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Gleamer: Who owns Gleamer?

RadNet agreed to acquire Gleamer in February 2026 for around two hundred and fifteen million euros upfront. RadNet also owns DeepHealth, a competing AI portfolio.

Rx30: Is Rx30 the same company as PioneerRx?

Both are owned by RedSail Technologies. They are sold as separate products to overlapping markets, but roadmap decisions sit with one company, which is worth knowing before treating them as independent options.

Gleamer: Is BoneView FDA cleared?

Yes, BoneView holds 510(k) clearance including for paediatric fracture detection, but the cleared finding set is narrower than the CE marked indication in Europe.

Rx30: What does it cost?

Not published. Request the total including hardware, interfaces and training rather than the monthly software fee.

Gleamer: What does the evidence actually show?

Multi-reader studies reported improved reader sensitivity for fracture detection and fewer false negatives, with the gain concentrated among less experienced readers in emergency settings.

Rx30: Why do pharmacies stay on it?

Installed base maturity. The interfaces to wholesalers, PBMs and hardware are long established, and those are the things that quietly stop a pharmacy working when they break.

Gleamer: Can I buy just BoneView?

Yes, modules are licensed individually, though the commercial pitch is now the Copilot bundle across modalities.

Rx30: How does it compare to PioneerRx?

PioneerRx is more aggressively developed around clinical services. Rx30 has the larger legacy base and broader front-end retail heritage. Same owner, different emphasis.

Rx30: Is it suitable for a small chain?

Yes, and that is one of its stronger cases. Multi-store consistency is better handled here than by the systems aimed purely at single independents.

Share

Related pages

More on Gleamer

More on Rx30

Keep looking

Other head to heads