Mining · head to head
acQuire GIM Suite vs RPMGlobal XPAC

acQuire GIM Suite
Mining
Geoscientific information management platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

RPMGlobal XPAC
Mining
Production scheduling and planning optimization
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: acQuire GIM Suite pricing is not published; RPMGlobal XPAC rPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- They diverge on capability: acQuire GIM Suite covers Drill hole data management, RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which acQuire GIM Suite and RPMGlobal XPAC actually diverge.
| Attribute | acQuire GIM Suite | RPMGlobal XPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1996 | 1995 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Windows, Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in acQuire GIM Suite
- Drill hole data management
- Sample tracking
- QAQC management
- Data validation
- Reporting tools
- Leapfrog
- Surpac
- Micromine
Only in RPMGlobal XPAC
- Production scheduling
- Resource allocation
- Constraint optimization
- Multi-scenario planning
- Real-time updates
- MineSched
- Whittle
- ERP systems
Both cover
- Vulcan
- Windows support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
acQuire GIM Suite
- Capturing and validating drillhole and geological datanot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Maintaining a single source of truth for geoscientific recordsnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Field data capture on mobile with offline workingnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Delivering geological data to modelling and reporting toolsnot RPMGlobal XPAC
RPMGlobal XPAC
- Midterm and strategic mine production schedulingnot acQuire GIM Suite
- Building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design datanot acQuire GIM Suite
- Comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operationsnot acQuire GIM Suite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
acQuire GIM Suite
- Pricing is not published
- Built specifically for mining geology rather than general data management
RPMGlobal XPAC
- RPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- XPAC is one of roughly 40 separate RPMGlobal products, so scheduling, simulation and asset management are separate purchases
- Obtaining any pricing requires contacting the vendor through a contact or support form
Pricing, plan by plan
acQuire GIM Suite
On request- GIM Suite Standard$8000/year
- Data management
- QAQC tools
- Validation rules
- GIM Suite Enterprise$18000/year
- Multi-site deployment
- Advanced workflows
- Integration APIs
RPMGlobal XPAC
On request- XPAC Standard$21000/year
- Production scheduling
- Resource optimization
- Constraint management
Which should you pick?
Choose acQuire GIM Suite if
- You need drill hole data management.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want sample tracking.
Choose RPMGlobal XPAC if
- You need production scheduling.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want resource allocation.
Questions people ask
- Is acQuire GIM Suite or RPMGlobal XPAC better?
- Neither clearly leads. acQuire GIM Suite starts at On request and RPMGlobal XPAC at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, acQuire GIM Suite or RPMGlobal XPAC?
- acQuire GIM Suite starts at On request and RPMGlobal XPAC at On request.
- Does acQuire GIM Suite or RPMGlobal XPAC run on more platforms?
- Both run on Windows, Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is acQuire GIM Suite best used for?
- acQuire GIM Suite is most often used for capturing and validating drillhole and geological data, maintaining a single source of truth for geoscientific records, field data capture on mobile with offline working, delivering geological data to modelling and reporting tools. Of those, capturing and validating drillhole and geological data and maintaining a single source of truth for geoscientific records are not what RPMGlobal XPAC is typically brought in for.
- What can acQuire GIM Suite do that RPMGlobal XPAC cannot?
- acQuire GIM Suite covers Drill hole data management, Sample tracking, QAQC management, Data validation. RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, Resource allocation, Constraint optimization, Multi-scenario planning. Both handle Vulcan, Windows support, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
acQuire GIM Suite: Is there a trial period or free evaluation?
The page does not mention a free trial or evaluation option. Pricing and trial details would need to be requested through the 'Contact us' link on the page.
SourceacQuire GIM Suite: How is GIM Suite priced?
No pricing is published on this page. The product appears to use a custom sales model where pricing is determined through direct contact with Acquire's sales team.
SourceacQuire GIM Suite: What is included with a standard subscription?
The page describes features like geological data management, mobile integration, and compliance features, but does not disclose what is included in different pricing tiers or subscription levels. This would need to be clarified during sales consultation.
SourceRelated pages
More on acQuire GIM Suite
More on RPMGlobal XPAC
Other head to heads
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Caterpillar MineStar
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Deswik Suite
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Leapfrog Geo
- acQuire GIM Suite vs EQuIS Enterprise
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Micromine
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Geoscience ANALYST
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Maxwell Datacloud
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Minviro
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Imago
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Enablon EHS
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Snowden Supervisor
- acQuire GIM Suite vs UDEC
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Wenco
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Whittle
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Seequent Central
- acQuire GIM Suite vs MineRP
- acQuire GIM Suite vs PCBC
- acQuire GIM Suite vs K-MINE
- acQuire GIM Suite vs MinePlan
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Datamine Studio RM
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Minemax
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Vulcan
- acQuire GIM Suite vs OptiMine
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Promine
- acQuire GIM Suite vs MineSched
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Surpac
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Deswik Suite
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Leapfrog Geo
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs EQuIS Enterprise
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Micromine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Geoscience ANALYST
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Maxwell Datacloud
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Minviro
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Imago
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Enablon EHS
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Snowden Supervisor
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs UDEC
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Wenco
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Whittle
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Seequent Central
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs MineRP
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs PCBC
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs K-MINE
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs MinePlan
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Datamine Studio RM
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Minemax
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Vulcan
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs OptiMine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Promine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs MineSched
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Surpac
