ERP · head to head
GEP SMART vs Rootstock

GEP SMART
ERP
Enterprise source-to-pay from a vendor that also sells the consulting and the outsourced procurement team
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Rootstock
ERP
Manufacturing ERP built natively on the Salesforce platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GEP SMART gEP sells the software, the consulting and the outsourced procurement team, so the vendor measuring the savings is often the vendor delivering them, which makes independent verification difficult.; Rootstock every Rootstock user also needs a paid Salesforce platform licence, so the true cost is two subscriptions stacked; third-party estimates put a fully loaded seat around 200 to 500 US dollars per user per month, which is far above the Rootstock line item alone.
- They diverge on capability: GEP SMART covers Unified source-to-pay, Rootstock covers Native Salesforce architecture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GEP SMART and Rootstock actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (ERP).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GEP SMART
- Unified source-to-pay
- Spend and category analytics
- Savings tracking
- Supplier risk management
- GEP QUANTUM
- Managed services attachment
Only in Rootstock
- Native Salesforce architecture
- Production and work orders
- Materials and MRP
- Inventory management
- Order to cash
- Project accounting
- Financials
- Quality and compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GEP SMART
- An enterprise that needs category expertise as well as software and would otherwise run two procurement processesnot Rootstock
- A company outsourcing tactical sourcing while retaining strategic categories, using one platform across bothnot Rootstock
- A multinational consolidating regional procurement systems onto one spend taxonomynot Rootstock
- An organisation that needs savings tracked and reconciled against realised spend rather than claimed in a spreadsheetnot Rootstock
Rootstock
- A discrete manufacturer already running Salesforce Sales Cloud that wants configured quotes to become works orders without an integration layer between two systemsnot GEP SMART
- An engineer-to-order equipment maker that needs project cost tracking and CRM opportunity data in one database for margin reportingnot GEP SMART
- A medical device supplier that needs lot and serial traceability under the same security and audit model as its customer recordsnot GEP SMART
- A manufacturer replacing an on-premise ERP whose IT team wants to stop maintaining servers and standardise administration on a platform it already supportsnot GEP SMART
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GEP SMART
- GEP sells the software, the consulting and the outsourced procurement team, so the vendor measuring the savings is often the vendor delivering them, which makes independent verification difficult.
- Nothing is published and reported entry points around half a million US dollars a year exclude implementation, which GEP typically delivers itself rather than through a competing integrator.
- Implementation being delivered by the vendor limits the pool of independent consultants who can advise you during the project or take over afterwards.
- Combined software and services engagements are difficult to unwind, because replacing the platform also means rebuilding procurement capability the outsourcer was providing.
- The platform is scoped for very large enterprises, so mid-market organisations face both a price and a complexity floor that no module selection brings down.
Rootstock
- Every Rootstock user also needs a paid Salesforce platform licence, so the true cost is two subscriptions stacked; third-party estimates put a fully loaded seat around 200 to 500 US dollars per user per month, which is far above the Rootstock line item alone.
- Rootstock publishes no pricing whatsoever, so budget-setting depends on reseller and analyst figures rather than vendor rates, and there is no public benchmark to test a quote against.
- Building on Salesforce means inheriting Salesforce governor limits and API constraints, which surface as batch size and data volume ceilings in high-transaction manufacturing that a purpose-built ERP would not hit.
- Your ERP is now hostage to another vendors commercial decisions: Salesforce list price rises, edition changes or licence policy shifts flow straight into your ERP running cost with no alternative supplier.
- Implementation is a serious project, commonly quoted in the tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars and measured in months, and the partner pool that genuinely knows both manufacturing and Salesforce-native ERP is small, which lengthens timelines and raises day rates.
Pricing, plan by plan
GEP SMART
On request- GEP SMART$undefined/year
- Scaled by managed spend volume, modules and user count
- Third parties report deployments starting around 500,000 USD per year
- Frequently bundled with GEP consulting or managed services
Rootstock
On request- Rootstock Cloud ERP$undefined/year
- Manufacturing, inventory and supply chain modules
- Runs as a managed package on the Salesforce Platform
- Salesforce platform licences purchased separately for every user
Which should you pick?
Choose GEP SMART if
- You need unified source-to-pay.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want spend and category analytics.
Choose Rootstock if
- You need native salesforce architecture.
- You work on Web, Salesforce Platform, iOS, Android.
- You also want production and work orders.
Questions people ask
- Is GEP SMART or Rootstock better?
- Neither clearly leads. GEP SMART starts at On request and Rootstock at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GEP SMART or Rootstock?
- GEP SMART starts at On request and Rootstock at On request.
- Does GEP SMART or Rootstock run on more platforms?
- GEP SMART runs on Web, iOS, Android. Rootstock runs on Web, Salesforce Platform, iOS, Android.
- What is GEP SMART best used for?
- GEP SMART is most often used for an enterprise that needs category expertise as well as software and would otherwise run two procurement processes, a company outsourcing tactical sourcing while retaining strategic categories, using one platform across both, a multinational consolidating regional procurement systems onto one spend taxonomy, an organisation that needs savings tracked and reconciled against realised spend rather than claimed in a spreadsheet. Of those, an enterprise that needs category expertise as well as software and would otherwise run two procurement processes and a company outsourcing tactical sourcing while retaining strategic categories, using one platform across both are not what Rootstock is typically brought in for.
- What can GEP SMART do that Rootstock cannot?
- GEP SMART covers Unified source-to-pay, Spend and category analytics, Savings tracking, Supplier risk management. Rootstock covers Native Salesforce architecture, Production and work orders, Materials and MRP, Inventory management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GEP SMART: Is GEP just a software company?
No. It sells procurement software, procurement consulting and outsourced procurement operations, and deals often combine all three.
Rootstock: Do I need Salesforce to run Rootstock?
Yes, and it is not optional. Rootstock is a managed package on the Salesforce Platform and every user requires a Salesforce licence in addition to the Rootstock subscription.
GEP SMART: What does GEP SMART cost?
Not published. Third parties report deployments from around 500,000 USD a year, scaled by managed spend, modules and users.
Rootstock: What does Rootstock actually cost?
Rootstock does not publish rates. Third-party estimates put the ERP subscription at roughly 150 to 300 US dollars per user per month before Salesforce licences, with implementation quoted separately.
GEP SMART: Who implements it?
GEP typically does, which shortens the project but reduces independent advice during and after it.
Rootstock: Is it suitable for process manufacturing?
It is built for discrete manufacturing. Recipe and batch-driven process manufacturers are a poor fit and should look elsewhere.
GEP SMART: How does it compare with Ivalua?
Both are single-platform enterprise source-to-pay. GEP adds consulting and managed services; Ivalua is software only and stronger on direct materials.
Rootstock: Has Rootstock been acquired?
No. Rootstock remains independent and was itself the acquirer, buying Salesforce-native applications firm Ascent Solutions in March 2026.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- GEP SMART vs Ivalua
- GEP SMART vs Levelpath
- GEP SMART vs Jaggaer
- GEP SMART vs Zycus
- GEP SMART vs Epicor
- GEP SMART vs Metasfresh
- GEP SMART vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- GEP SMART vs Cin7
- GEP SMART vs Visibility
- GEP SMART vs iDempiere
- GEP SMART vs OpenBravo
- GEP SMART vs ADempiere
- GEP SMART vs Cegid
- GEP SMART vs Comarch
- GEP SMART vs Dolibarr
- GEP SMART vs Dynamics AX
- GEP SMART vs Ecount
- GEP SMART vs Cin7 Core
- GEP SMART vs NetSuite
- GEP SMART vs Katana MRP
- GEP SMART vs MRPeasy
- GEP SMART vs Global Shop Solutions
- GEP SMART vs IQMS
- GEP SMART vs IFS Cloud
- GEP SMART vs QAD
- GEP SMART vs SYSPRO
- GEP SMART vs Aptean
- GEP SMART vs Omnea
- GEP SMART vs Sage X3
- Rootstock vs Ivalua
- Rootstock vs Levelpath
- Rootstock vs Jaggaer
- Rootstock vs Zycus
- Rootstock vs Epicor
- Rootstock vs Metasfresh
- Rootstock vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- Rootstock vs Cin7
- Rootstock vs Visibility
- Rootstock vs iDempiere
- Rootstock vs OpenBravo
- Rootstock vs ADempiere
- Rootstock vs Cegid
- Rootstock vs Comarch
- Rootstock vs Dolibarr
- Rootstock vs Dynamics AX
- Rootstock vs Ecount
- Rootstock vs Cin7 Core
- Rootstock vs NetSuite
- Rootstock vs Katana MRP
- Rootstock vs MRPeasy
- Rootstock vs Global Shop Solutions
- Rootstock vs IQMS
- Rootstock vs IFS Cloud
- Rootstock vs QAD
- Rootstock vs SYSPRO
- Rootstock vs Aptean
- Rootstock vs Omnea
- Rootstock vs Sage X3
