Softwr

Insurance · head to head

Riskonnect vs Sapiens CoreSuite

Riskonnect logo

Riskonnect

Insurance

Integrated risk management and claims administration for corporate risk teams

From
On request
Rated
-
Sapiens CoreSuite logo

Sapiens CoreSuite

Insurance

Digital insurance platform for carriers worldwide

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Riskonnect total first year cost is dominated by implementation rather than licence; vendor professional services frequently approach the annual licence figure and the internal staff time to define data structures and migrate historic claims is a comparable third cost that never appears in the quote.; Sapiens CoreSuite pricing not publicly available, requires contact with sales
  • They diverge on capability: Riskonnect covers Claims administration, Sapiens CoreSuite covers Policy administration.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Riskonnect and Sapiens CoreSuite actually diverge.

Attributes where Riskonnect and Sapiens CoreSuite differ
AttributeRiskonnectSapiens CoreSuite
Pricing modelquotesubscription
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb, Api, Mobile
FoundedUnknown1982

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Riskonnect

  • Claims administration
  • Total cost of risk reporting
  • Policy and exposure management
  • Enterprise risk management
  • Health and safety
  • Business continuity
  • Third party risk
  • Data integration

Only in Sapiens CoreSuite

  • Policy administration
  • Claims processing
  • Underwriting automation
  • Product configuration
  • Agent portal
  • Customer self-service
  • Reinsurance
  • Regulatory reporting

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Riskonnect

  • A self insured employer that wants to own its workers compensation loss data rather than depend on the broker or TPA system it will lose at renewalnot Sapiens CoreSuite
  • A risk manager building a defensible total cost of risk figure for the CFO across claims, premium, retained losses and collateralnot Sapiens CoreSuite
  • A third party administrator running claims for multiple clients that needs separate entity structures on one platformnot Sapiens CoreSuite
  • A multinational consolidating claims, safety incidents and enterprise risk registers onto one entity hierarchy for board reportingnot Sapiens CoreSuite

Sapiens CoreSuite

  • Core system replacementnot Riskonnect
  • Digital transformationnot Riskonnect
  • New product launchnot Riskonnect
  • Market expansionnot Riskonnect

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Riskonnect

  • Total first year cost is dominated by implementation rather than licence; vendor professional services frequently approach the annual licence figure and the internal staff time to define data structures and migrate historic claims is a comparable third cost that never appears in the quote.
  • The platform grew through acquisitions including Ventiv and Sword GRC, so module interfaces and administration models are not uniform and staff trained on one module do not transfer cleanly to another.
  • Licensing is modular, so the price quoted for a claims deployment rises materially the first time the risk team wants ERM or business continuity, and there is little negotiating leverage once the claims data is migrated.
  • Configuration depth means most changes go through an administrator or the vendor rather than an end user, and risk teams without a dedicated system administrator find that change requests queue for weeks.
  • Historic claims data migration quality depends entirely on what the outgoing broker or TPA will export, and incomplete legacy data undermines the multi year trend reporting that was the reason for buying.

Sapiens CoreSuite

  • Pricing not publicly available, requires contact with sales
  • Smaller user base compared to some competitors in enterprise insurance

Pricing, plan by plan

Riskonnect

On request
  • Riskonnect Platform$undefined/year
    • Licensed by module, named user count and entity structure
    • Claims administration and RMIS core
    • Optional ERM, safety, continuity and third party risk modules

Sapiens CoreSuite

On request
  • Standard$undefined/month
    • Core policy administration
    • Claims management
    • Standard integrations
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • All Standard features
    • Advanced analytics
    • Multi-line support

Which should you pick?

Choose Riskonnect if

  • You need claims administration.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want total cost of risk reporting.

Choose Sapiens CoreSuite if

  • You need policy administration.
  • You work on Web, Api, Mobile.
  • You also want claims processing.

Questions people ask

Is Riskonnect or Sapiens CoreSuite better?
Neither clearly leads. Riskonnect starts at On request and Sapiens CoreSuite at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Riskonnect or Sapiens CoreSuite?
Riskonnect starts at On request and Sapiens CoreSuite at On request.
Does Riskonnect or Sapiens CoreSuite run on more platforms?
Riskonnect runs on Web, iOS, Android. Sapiens CoreSuite runs on Web, Api, Mobile.
What is Riskonnect best used for?
Riskonnect is most often used for a self insured employer that wants to own its workers compensation loss data rather than depend on the broker or tpa system it will lose at renewal, a risk manager building a defensible total cost of risk figure for the cfo across claims, premium, retained losses and collateral, a third party administrator running claims for multiple clients that needs separate entity structures on one platform, a multinational consolidating claims, safety incidents and enterprise risk registers onto one entity hierarchy for board reporting. Of those, a self insured employer that wants to own its workers compensation loss data rather than depend on the broker or tpa system it will lose at renewal and a risk manager building a defensible total cost of risk figure for the cfo across claims, premium, retained losses and collateral are not what Sapiens CoreSuite is typically brought in for.
What can Riskonnect do that Sapiens CoreSuite cannot?
Riskonnect covers Claims administration, Total cost of risk reporting, Policy and exposure management, Enterprise risk management. Sapiens CoreSuite covers Policy administration, Claims processing, Underwriting automation, Product configuration.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Riskonnect: What does Riskonnect actually cost?

Nothing is published. Reported deals range from roughly 35,000 US dollars a year for a narrow deployment to well over 250,000 for a multi module enterprise programme, with implementation services quoted separately and often of similar magnitude in year one.

Sapiens CoreSuite: What insurance lines does Sapiens CoreSuite support?

Sapiens CoreSuite supports multiple insurance lines including Property & Casualty, Life & Annuities, Life & Pensions, and Health Insurance with dedicated platform versions for each.

Source
Riskonnect: How long does implementation take?

Three to six months is typical for a claims and RMIS deployment, longer where historic loss data from several brokers or TPAs has to be normalised.

Sapiens CoreSuite: Is Sapiens CoreSuite cloud-based?

Yes. Sapiens CoreSuite is a comprehensive cloud-based insurance software solution designed for modern insurance operations.

Source
Riskonnect: Why not just use the broker supplied RMIS?

Because you lose it when you change broker, and the data model serves the broker reporting rather than yours. Owning the system is the main reason companies pay for one.

Sapiens CoreSuite: What modules are included in CoreSuite for P&C?

CoreSuite for P&C includes PolicyPro for policy administration, BillingPro for billing management, and ClaimsPro for claims processing.

Source
Riskonnect: Is it a GRC platform or a claims system?

Both, but the claims and insurable risk core is the mature part. If you want pure GRC without claims, you are buying more platform than you need.

Sapiens CoreSuite: When was the latest version of Sapiens CoreSuite released?

In September 2025, Sapiens announced the latest version of Sapiens CoreSuite for Property & Casualty for the North American market with significant performance and usability improvements.

Source
Sapiens CoreSuite: Is Sapiens CoreSuite modular?

Yes. CoreSuite is designed as a modular platform where insurers can select components for their specific business needs including policy, billing, and claims management.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads