Softwr

Insurance · head to head

Origami Risk vs Riskonnect

Origami Risk logo

Origami Risk

Insurance

Integrated risk management platform

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Riskonnect logo

Riskonnect

Insurance

Integrated risk management and claims administration for corporate risk teams

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Origami Risk pricing not published; requires quote request; Riskonnect total first year cost is dominated by implementation rather than licence; vendor professional services frequently approach the annual licence figure and the internal staff time to define data structures and migrate historic claims is a comparable third cost that never appears in the quote.
  • They diverge on capability: Origami Risk covers Policy management, Riskonnect covers Total cost of risk reporting.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Origami Risk and Riskonnect actually diverge.

Attributes where Origami Risk and Riskonnect differ
AttributeOrigami RiskRiskonnect
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote
PlatformsWeb, Ios, Android, ApiWeb, iOS, Android
Founded2009Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Origami Risk

  • Policy management
  • Risk analytics
  • Incident management
  • Safety compliance
  • Certificate tracking
  • Vendor management
  • Custom workflows
  • ISO ClaimSearch

Only in Riskonnect

  • Total cost of risk reporting
  • Policy and exposure management
  • Enterprise risk management
  • Health and safety
  • Business continuity
  • Third party risk
  • Data integration

Both cover

  • Claims administration

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Origami Risk

  • Claims administrationnot Riskonnect
  • Risk managementnot Riskonnect
  • Safety compliancenot Riskonnect
  • Insurance trackingnot Riskonnect
  • Analytics & reportingnot Riskonnect

Riskonnect

  • A self insured employer that wants to own its workers compensation loss data rather than depend on the broker or TPA system it will lose at renewalnot Origami Risk
  • A risk manager building a defensible total cost of risk figure for the CFO across claims, premium, retained losses and collateralnot Origami Risk
  • A third party administrator running claims for multiple clients that needs separate entity structures on one platformnot Origami Risk
  • A multinational consolidating claims, safety incidents and enterprise risk registers onto one entity hierarchy for board reportingnot Origami Risk

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Origami Risk

  • Pricing not published; requires quote request

Riskonnect

  • Total first year cost is dominated by implementation rather than licence; vendor professional services frequently approach the annual licence figure and the internal staff time to define data structures and migrate historic claims is a comparable third cost that never appears in the quote.
  • The platform grew through acquisitions including Ventiv and Sword GRC, so module interfaces and administration models are not uniform and staff trained on one module do not transfer cleanly to another.
  • Licensing is modular, so the price quoted for a claims deployment rises materially the first time the risk team wants ERM or business continuity, and there is little negotiating leverage once the claims data is migrated.
  • Configuration depth means most changes go through an administrator or the vendor rather than an end user, and risk teams without a dedicated system administrator find that change requests queue for weeks.
  • Historic claims data migration quality depends entirely on what the outgoing broker or TPA will export, and incomplete legacy data undermines the multi year trend reporting that was the reason for buying.

Pricing, plan by plan

Origami Risk

On request
  • Core Platform$undefined/year
    • Claims management
    • Policy tracking
    • Incident reporting
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • All Core features
    • Advanced analytics
    • Safety management

Riskonnect

On request
  • Riskonnect Platform$undefined/year
    • Licensed by module, named user count and entity structure
    • Claims administration and RMIS core
    • Optional ERM, safety, continuity and third party risk modules

Which should you pick?

Choose Origami Risk if

  • You need policy management.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
  • You also want risk analytics.
Origami Risk review

Choose Riskonnect if

  • You need total cost of risk reporting.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want policy and exposure management.
Riskonnect review

Questions people ask

Is Origami Risk or Riskonnect better?
Neither clearly leads. Origami Risk starts at On request and Riskonnect at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Origami Risk or Riskonnect?
Origami Risk starts at On request and Riskonnect at On request.
Does Origami Risk or Riskonnect run on more platforms?
Origami Risk runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Riskonnect runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is Origami Risk best used for?
Origami Risk is most often used for claims administration, risk management, safety compliance, insurance tracking. Of those, claims administration and risk management are not what Riskonnect is typically brought in for.
What can Origami Risk do that Riskonnect cannot?
Origami Risk covers Policy management, Risk analytics, Incident management, Safety compliance. Riskonnect covers Total cost of risk reporting, Policy and exposure management, Enterprise risk management, Health and safety. Both handle Claims administration.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Origami Risk: How is Origami Risk priced?

Origami Risk does not publish pricing on its website. Pricing is customized based on organization size, specific modules needed, and implementation scope. Contact sales to request a demo and pricing quote.

Source
Riskonnect: What does Riskonnect actually cost?

Nothing is published. Reported deals range from roughly 35,000 US dollars a year for a narrow deployment to well over 250,000 for a multi module enterprise programme, with implementation services quoted separately and often of similar magnitude in year one.

Riskonnect: How long does implementation take?

Three to six months is typical for a claims and RMIS deployment, longer where historic loss data from several brokers or TPAs has to be normalised.

Riskonnect: Why not just use the broker supplied RMIS?

Because you lose it when you change broker, and the data model serves the broker reporting rather than yours. Owning the system is the main reason companies pay for one.

Riskonnect: Is it a GRC platform or a claims system?

Both, but the claims and insurable risk core is the mature part. If you want pure GRC without claims, you are buying more platform than you need.

Share

Related pages

More on Origami Risk

More on Riskonnect

Keep looking

Other head to heads