Databases · head to head
Qdrant vs Spacelift

Qdrant
Databases
High-performance vector database for similarity search and embedding-based retrieval
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Spacelift
Developer Tools
Infrastructure-as-code orchestration for Terraform, OpenTofu, Pulumi and Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Qdrant is an open-source vector search engine.
- Both are free.
- Where Qdrant falls short: free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments.
- Where Spacelift falls short: three of the five tiers are quote-only, so a shortlist cannot be costed without entering a sales process with each vendor on it.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Qdrant and Spacelift actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Qdrant
Nothing recorded that Spacelift does not also cover.
Only in Spacelift
- Multi-tool orchestration
- Policy as code
- Private workers
- Spaces
- Blueprints
- Drift detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Qdrant
- Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) backends for LLM applicationsnot Spacelift
- Semantic search across large document corporanot Spacelift
- Multimodal retrieval (text, images, video) for recommendation systemsnot Spacelift
- Similarity-based product or content recommendationsnot Spacelift
- Real-time vector indexing for streaming embedding datanot Spacelift
Spacelift
- Platform teams running infrastructure changes through approval gates rather than through application CInot Qdrant
- Organisations standardising Terraform and OpenTofu across many teams with policy enforcementnot Qdrant
- Estates needing private runners so cloud credentials never leave the networknot Qdrant
- Teams wanting drift detection and reconciliation rather than plan-time checks alonenot Qdrant
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Qdrant
- Free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments
- Standard and Premium pricing usage-based; specific costs not published; requires calculator or quote
- Requires understanding of embeddings and vector search concepts; not suitable for SQL-only teams
- Early-stage serverless offering (coming soon) suggests maturity gaps in that deployment model
Spacelift
- Users are unlimited and private workers are metered, so deployment concurrency rather than headcount drives the bill, which inverts how most engineering budgets are built and is easy to under-forecast
- There is no affordable paid entry point. The free tier stops at two users and the next tier is a five-figure commitment with nothing in between
- Three of the five tiers are quote-only, so a shortlist cannot be costed without entering a sales process with each vendor on it
- The self-hosted build lags the hosted one, has no public worker pool and lacks the Azure and Google Cloud integrations available in the SaaS product, with OIDC federation offered as the workaround
- Stacks, Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and Spacelift-managed state are proprietary constructs, so leaving means rebuilding the orchestration layer rather than pointing it at a different runner
Pricing, plan by plan
Qdrant
Free- FreeFree
- Single-node cluster
- 0.5 vCPU
- 1GB RAM
- StandardOn request
- Dedicated resources
- Flexible scaling
- High availability
- PremiumOn request
- SSO and SAML
- Private VPC links
- 99.9% uptime SLA
Spacelift
Free- FreeFree
- Two users
- Public workers only
- No private workers
- Starter PlusOn request
- Unlimited users
- Two public workers
- One to two private workers
- BusinessOn request
- Unlimited users
- Three private workers
- Quoted
- EnterpriseOn request
- Unlimited users
- Five to thirty private workers
- Self-hosted option
Which should you pick?
Choose Qdrant if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Browser extension, Serverless (coming).
Choose Spacelift if
- You need multi-tool orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want policy as code.
Questions people ask
- Is Qdrant or Spacelift better?
- Neither clearly leads. Qdrant starts at Free and Spacelift at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Qdrant or Spacelift?
- Qdrant starts at Free and Spacelift at Free.
- Does Qdrant or Spacelift run on more platforms?
- Qdrant runs on Web, Self-hosted, Browser extension, Serverless (coming). Spacelift runs on Web, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Qdrant for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Qdrant best used for?
- Qdrant is most often used for retrieval-augmented generation (rag) backends for llm applications, semantic search across large document corpora, multimodal retrieval (text, images, video) for recommendation systems, similarity-based product or content recommendations. Of those, retrieval-augmented generation (rag) backends for llm applications and semantic search across large document corpora are not what Spacelift is typically brought in for.
- What can Qdrant do that Spacelift cannot?
- Spacelift covers Multi-tool orchestration, Policy as code, Private workers, Spaces.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Qdrant: Can I use Qdrant for free?
Yes, Qdrant offers a free tier that provides a single node cluster with 0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, and 4GB disk space. It includes free cloud inference with selected models and is described as free forever for testing and prototypes.
SourceSpacelift: How is Spacelift priced?
By tier and by private worker count rather than per user. Users are unlimited on every paid plan. The published figure on the pricing page carries no period label, and the FAQ describes the tier as an annual subscription, so confirm the period in writing.
Qdrant: How is Qdrant Cloud billing calculated?
Billing is calculated based on actual resource usage during each billing period. You are charged hourly for compute (vCPU), memory (GB), storage (GB), backups, and any paid inference tokens used.
SourceSpacelift: Does it support OpenTofu?
Yes, and Spacelift sponsors the OpenTofu project, which is a substantive hedge for anyone avoiding Terraform under the Business Source Licence.
Qdrant: What happens if I scale beyond the free tier?
The Standard Tier uses the same usage-based billing model as the free tier but adds features like dedicated resources with flexible scaling, highly available setups with backup and disaster recovery, and a 99.5% uptime SLA.
SourceSpacelift: Is there a self-hosted version?
Yes, described as carrying Enterprise functionality, but it is priced on request and lags the hosted product on cloud integrations.
Qdrant: What SLA does Qdrant offer?
The Standard Tier provides 99.5% uptime SLA. The Premium Tier, which requires a minimum spend for enterprises, offers 99.9% uptime SLA along with single sign-on and private VPC links.
SourceSpacelift: Why not just use the CI system we already have?
That is the real comparison. General purpose CI handles state, drift, approval gates and concurrency control for infrastructure poorly, and whether that is worth a five-figure floor depends on how much infrastructure change your organisation actually ships.
Qdrant: Are there dedicated cloud infrastructure options?
Yes, Qdrant offers Hybrid Cloud (runs on your infrastructure) and Private Cloud (complete isolation) options, both with custom pricing that requires contacting the sales team.
SourceSpacelift: What happens to our pipelines if we leave?
They do not port. Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and managed state are Spacelift constructs and the orchestration has to be rebuilt elsewhere.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Qdrant vs Zilliz
- Qdrant vs Chroma
- Qdrant vs Vespa
- Qdrant vs YugabyteDB
- Qdrant vs NATS
- Qdrant vs QuestDB
- Qdrant vs Cockroach Labs
- Qdrant vs Elasticsearch
- Qdrant vs Redis
- Qdrant vs Apache Druid
- Qdrant vs Meilisearch
- Qdrant vs Couchbase
- Qdrant vs SingleStore
- Qdrant vs TiDB
- Qdrant vs Tinybird
- Qdrant vs Typesense
- Qdrant vs Valkey
- Qdrant vs Apache Doris
- Qdrant vs Atlantis
- Qdrant vs Earthly
- Qdrant vs Harness
- Qdrant vs Terraform
- Qdrant vs Cortex
- Qdrant vs OpsLevel
- Qdrant vs Backstage
- Qdrant vs Envoy
- Qdrant vs Istio
- Qdrant vs Okteto
- Qdrant vs Kubernetes
- Qdrant vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Qdrant vs Eclipse
- Qdrant vs Garden
- Qdrant vs GitLab CI/CD
- Qdrant vs HCP Terraform
- Qdrant vs Helm
- Qdrant vs Jenkins
- Spacelift vs Zilliz
- Spacelift vs Chroma
- Spacelift vs Vespa
- Spacelift vs YugabyteDB
- Spacelift vs NATS
- Spacelift vs QuestDB
- Spacelift vs Cockroach Labs
- Spacelift vs Elasticsearch
- Spacelift vs Redis
- Spacelift vs Apache Druid
- Spacelift vs Meilisearch
- Spacelift vs Couchbase
- Spacelift vs SingleStore
- Spacelift vs TiDB
- Spacelift vs Tinybird
- Spacelift vs Typesense
- Spacelift vs Valkey
- Spacelift vs Apache Doris
- Spacelift vs Atlantis
- Spacelift vs Earthly
- Spacelift vs Harness
- Spacelift vs Terraform
- Spacelift vs Cortex
- Spacelift vs OpsLevel
- Spacelift vs Backstage
- Spacelift vs Envoy
- Spacelift vs Istio
- Spacelift vs Okteto
- Spacelift vs Kubernetes
- Spacelift vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Spacelift vs Eclipse
- Spacelift vs Garden
- Spacelift vs GitLab CI/CD
- Spacelift vs HCP Terraform
- Spacelift vs Helm
- Spacelift vs Jenkins
