Construction · head to head
Cubit Estimating vs Propeller Aero

Cubit Estimating
Construction
Australian estimating and on-screen takeoff in one window, priced openly per user per month
- From
- 167/month
- Rated
- -

Propeller Aero
Construction
Drone survey processing and earthworks volume measurement for sites that measure stockpiles weekly
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cubit Estimating every subscription carries a minimum twelve month term, so a firm that hires an estimator for one tender period pays for the full year regardless.; Propeller Aero platform pricing is not published and is scoped by sites and users, so a contractor with many short-lived sites can be quoted very differently from one with a few long ones, and neither can benchmark against a list price
- They diverge on capability: Cubit Estimating covers Integrated takeoff and estimate, Propeller Aero covers Photogrammetric processing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cubit Estimating and Propeller Aero actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cubit Estimating | Propeller Aero |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | 167/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | Hardware purchase plus a quoted platform subscription |
| Platforms | Windows | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cubit Estimating
- Integrated takeoff and estimate
- Calculation and rate sheets
- Price list management
- Bills of quantities
- BIM and IFC takeoff
- Revision management
- AI Estimating add-on
- Job collaboration
Only in Propeller Aero
- Photogrammetric processing
- AeroPoints ground control
- Volume measurement
- Design surface comparison
- Progress timeline
- Machine telemetry
- Corrections network
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cubit Estimating
- An Australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement toolnot Propeller Aero
- A quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local conventionnot Propeller Aero
- A subcontractor pricing repeat work from maintained supplier price lists rather than rebuilding rates each tendernot Propeller Aero
- A small estimating team that needs to know the annual cost before booking a demo, because the rate card is publishednot Propeller Aero
Propeller Aero
- A quarry that reconciles stockpile inventory monthly for its accounts and wants the volume evidence to survive an auditnot Cubit Estimating
- An earthworks contractor claiming progress payments on cubic metres moved who needs an independent measurement the client will acceptnot Cubit Estimating
- A civil site checking whether a subgrade is within tolerance of the design before the surfacing crew arrivesnot Cubit Estimating
- A mine that wants weekly volume reporting without a survey crew on the ground every weeknot Cubit Estimating
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cubit Estimating
- Every subscription carries a minimum twelve month term, so a firm that hires an estimator for one tender period pays for the full year regardless.
- BIM and IFC takeoff sits only in Enterprise at $250 per user per month, meaning a builder who receives models rather than PDFs is pushed to the top tier whether or not it needs collaboration features.
- The product is Windows only with no macOS or browser client, which excludes practices standardised on Macs unless they run virtualisation.
- Rate libraries, measurement conventions and BOQ structures follow Australian practice, so buyers outside Australia and New Zealand inherit a method that does not match their local standard forms.
- The AI Estimating add-on is priced at an explicitly temporary introductory rate, so a firm building the feature into its workflow is accepting an unspecified future increase on top of the seat price.
Propeller Aero
- Platform pricing is not published and is scoped by sites and users, so a contractor with many short-lived sites can be quoted very differently from one with a few long ones, and neither can benchmark against a list price
- The corrections network is free only while you hold a current platform licence, so cancelling the platform subscription reintroduces a 1,000 dollar per year per group hardware cost that many buyers do not model
- AeroPoints are a hardware purchase at 1,000 dollars each and most sites need several, so the true entry cost includes several thousand dollars of equipment on top of a subscription
- It measures rather than designs, so a contractor still needs Civil 3D, Trimble Business Center or an equivalent to produce and revise the design surfaces the measurement is compared against
- Accuracy depends on flight planning, ground control placement and weather, and a poorly flown survey produces a confident wrong volume, so an organisation still needs someone who understands survey error rather than only a drone pilot
Pricing, plan by plan
Cubit Estimating
167/month- Standard$167/month
- Integrated estimating and takeoff
- Calculation sheets, rate sheets and price lists
- Basic job management
- Professional$222/month
- Everything in Standard
- Code grouping
- Custom reporting
- Enterprise$250/month
- Everything in Professional
- BIM and IFC takeoff
- Multi-user job collaboration
- AI Estimating add-on$20/month
- Automated element recognition
- Works with any edition
- Introductory rate the vendor says will increase
Propeller Aero
On request- AeroPoint ground control unit$1000/one-time
- Single solar-powered GNSS ground control marker
- Includes 12 months of the Propeller Corrections Network
- Network renewal 1,000 USD per year per AeroPoint group
- Propeller Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted by number of sites, users and survey volume
- Not published
- Processing turnaround and support level vary by agreement
Which should you pick?
Choose Cubit Estimating if
- You need integrated takeoff and estimate.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want calculation and rate sheets.
Choose Propeller Aero if
- You need photogrammetric processing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want aeropoints ground control.
Questions people ask
- Is Cubit Estimating or Propeller Aero better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cubit Estimating starts at 167/month and Propeller Aero at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cubit Estimating or Propeller Aero?
- Cubit Estimating starts at 167/month and Propeller Aero at On request.
- Does Cubit Estimating or Propeller Aero run on more platforms?
- Cubit Estimating runs on Windows. Propeller Aero runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Cubit Estimating best used for?
- Cubit Estimating is most often used for an australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement tool, a quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local convention, a subcontractor pricing repeat work from maintained supplier price lists rather than rebuilding rates each tender, a small estimating team that needs to know the annual cost before booking a demo, because the rate card is published. Of those, an australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement tool and a quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local convention are not what Propeller Aero is typically brought in for.
- What can Cubit Estimating do that Propeller Aero cannot?
- Cubit Estimating covers Integrated takeoff and estimate, Calculation and rate sheets, Price list management, Bills of quantities. Propeller Aero covers Photogrammetric processing, AeroPoints ground control, Volume measurement, Design surface comparison.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cubit Estimating: What does Cubit actually cost?
Standard $167, Professional $222 and Enterprise $250 per user per month on annual billing, in Australian dollars excluding GST. Monthly billing is about 16 per cent more.
Propeller Aero: How much does Propeller cost?
The platform is quoted and not published. AeroPoints are 1,000 US dollars each, with the corrections network included for twelve months and thereafter free while a platform licence is current, otherwise 1,000 dollars a year per group.
Cubit Estimating: Can I get BIM takeoff without the Enterprise tier?
No. IFC model takeoff is an Enterprise feature only.
Propeller Aero: Do I need AeroPoints?
No, you can use conventional surveyed ground control, but the AeroPoints workflow is the main reason contractors choose Propeller over generic photogrammetry.
Cubit Estimating: Is there a perpetual licence?
No. Cubit Estimating is subscription only with a minimum twelve month commitment.
Propeller Aero: Is it survey grade?
Propeller states centimetre-level accuracy with correct ground control. Whether that satisfies a contract depends on your specification and on how the survey was flown, not on the software alone.
Cubit Estimating: Does it suit contractors outside Australia?
It works, but rate libraries and BOQ conventions follow Australian standards, so buyers elsewhere do more setup than a locally built alternative would need.
Propeller Aero: Who owns the data?
You retain your survey data and can export surfaces and point clouds, but check the export formats and retention terms in your contract before closeout, because bulk historical export is not a self-service one-click operation.
Related pages
More on Cubit Estimating
More on Propeller Aero
Other head to heads
- Cubit Estimating vs Togal.AI
- Cubit Estimating vs PlanSwift
- Cubit Estimating vs Sage Estimating
- Cubit Estimating vs Bluebeam Revu
- Cubit Estimating vs RIB CostX
- Cubit Estimating vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Cubit Estimating vs HCSS
- Cubit Estimating vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Cubit Estimating vs Handoff
- Cubit Estimating vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Cubit Estimating vs B2W Estimate
- Cubit Estimating vs Dalux
- Cubit Estimating vs Bridgit Bravo
- Cubit Estimating vs Builderbox
- Cubit Estimating vs Buildots
- Cubit Estimating vs Buildxact
- Cubit Estimating vs Chief Architect
- Cubit Estimating vs Clearstory
- Cubit Estimating vs Trimble
- Cubit Estimating vs Reconstruct
- Cubit Estimating vs Sitemark
- Cubit Estimating vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Cubit Estimating vs HammerTech
- Cubit Estimating vs Kojo
- Cubit Estimating vs Topcon MAGNET
- Cubit Estimating vs Smartsheet Construction
- Cubit Estimating vs Adaptive
- Cubit Estimating vs ALICE Technologies
- Cubit Estimating vs Trimble Pay
- Propeller Aero vs Togal.AI
- Propeller Aero vs PlanSwift
- Propeller Aero vs Sage Estimating
- Propeller Aero vs Bluebeam Revu
- Propeller Aero vs RIB CostX
- Propeller Aero vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Propeller Aero vs HCSS
- Propeller Aero vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Propeller Aero vs Handoff
- Propeller Aero vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Propeller Aero vs B2W Estimate
- Propeller Aero vs Dalux
- Propeller Aero vs Bridgit Bravo
- Propeller Aero vs Builderbox
- Propeller Aero vs Buildots
- Propeller Aero vs Buildxact
- Propeller Aero vs Chief Architect
- Propeller Aero vs Clearstory
- Propeller Aero vs Trimble
- Propeller Aero vs Reconstruct
- Propeller Aero vs Sitemark
- Propeller Aero vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Propeller Aero vs HammerTech
- Propeller Aero vs Kojo
- Propeller Aero vs Topcon MAGNET
- Propeller Aero vs Smartsheet Construction
- Propeller Aero vs Adaptive
- Propeller Aero vs ALICE Technologies
- Propeller Aero vs Trimble Pay
