Construction · head to head
Clearstory vs Propeller Aero

Clearstory
Construction
Digital change order and time and materials tag exchange between subcontractors and general contractors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Propeller Aero
Construction
Drone survey processing and earthworks volume measurement for sites that measure stockpiles weekly
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clearstory value depends on the counterparty using it, so a subcontractor whose general contractors have not adopted it ends up running the digital process and the emailed one at the same time.; Propeller Aero platform pricing is not published and is scoped by sites and users, so a contractor with many short-lived sites can be quoted very differently from one with a few long ones, and neither can benchmark against a list price
- They diverge on capability: Clearstory covers Digital time and materials tags, Propeller Aero covers Photogrammetric processing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clearstory and Propeller Aero actually diverge.
| Attribute | Clearstory | Propeller Aero |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | Hardware purchase plus a quoted platform subscription |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clearstory
- Digital time and materials tags
- Review and signature routing
- Change order log
- Cost exposure reporting
- Field mobile capture
- Document export
Only in Propeller Aero
- Photogrammetric processing
- AeroPoints ground control
- Volume measurement
- Design surface comparison
- Progress timeline
- Machine telemetry
- Corrections network
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clearstory
- A speciality subcontractor that regularly performs extra work and struggles to get tags signednot Propeller Aero
- A general contractor tired of receiving a stack of disputed tags at project closeoutnot Propeller Aero
- A project team that needs the value of pending extras visible during the job rather than after itnot Propeller Aero
- A contractor standardising change documentation across trades on a large projectnot Propeller Aero
Propeller Aero
- A quarry that reconciles stockpile inventory monthly for its accounts and wants the volume evidence to survive an auditnot Clearstory
- An earthworks contractor claiming progress payments on cubic metres moved who needs an independent measurement the client will acceptnot Clearstory
- A civil site checking whether a subgrade is within tolerance of the design before the surfacing crew arrivesnot Clearstory
- A mine that wants weekly volume reporting without a survey crew on the ground every weeknot Clearstory
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clearstory
- Value depends on the counterparty using it, so a subcontractor whose general contractors have not adopted it ends up running the digital process and the emailed one at the same time.
- It documents extra work but does not settle it; a general contractor determined not to pay is not persuaded by better paperwork, only better positioned to be argued with.
- Field staff have to complete tags properly for the record to hold up, and the discipline required is the same discipline that was failing on paper.
- Poor connectivity in basements, plant rooms and lift shafts is exactly where extra work gets documented, so offline reliability needs testing before rollout rather than after.
- It overlaps with change management already present in Procore and similar platforms, so buyers must be clear about which system holds the authoritative log or they will maintain two.
Propeller Aero
- Platform pricing is not published and is scoped by sites and users, so a contractor with many short-lived sites can be quoted very differently from one with a few long ones, and neither can benchmark against a list price
- The corrections network is free only while you hold a current platform licence, so cancelling the platform subscription reintroduces a 1,000 dollar per year per group hardware cost that many buyers do not model
- AeroPoints are a hardware purchase at 1,000 dollars each and most sites need several, so the true entry cost includes several thousand dollars of equipment on top of a subscription
- It measures rather than designs, so a contractor still needs Civil 3D, Trimble Business Center or an equivalent to produce and revise the design surfaces the measurement is compared against
- Accuracy depends on flight planning, ground control placement and weather, and a poorly flown survey produces a confident wrong volume, so an organisation still needs someone who understands survey error rather than only a drone pilot
Pricing, plan by plan
Clearstory
On request- Clearstory$undefined/year
- Digital time and materials tags
- Change order log
- Mobile field capture
Propeller Aero
On request- AeroPoint ground control unit$1000/one-time
- Single solar-powered GNSS ground control marker
- Includes 12 months of the Propeller Corrections Network
- Network renewal 1,000 USD per year per AeroPoint group
- Propeller Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted by number of sites, users and survey volume
- Not published
- Processing turnaround and support level vary by agreement
Which should you pick?
Choose Clearstory if
- You need digital time and materials tags.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want review and signature routing.
Choose Propeller Aero if
- You need photogrammetric processing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want aeropoints ground control.
Questions people ask
- Is Clearstory or Propeller Aero better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clearstory starts at On request and Propeller Aero at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clearstory or Propeller Aero?
- Clearstory starts at On request and Propeller Aero at On request.
- Does Clearstory or Propeller Aero run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Clearstory best used for?
- Clearstory is most often used for a speciality subcontractor that regularly performs extra work and struggles to get tags signed, a general contractor tired of receiving a stack of disputed tags at project closeout, a project team that needs the value of pending extras visible during the job rather than after it, a contractor standardising change documentation across trades on a large project. Of those, a speciality subcontractor that regularly performs extra work and struggles to get tags signed and a general contractor tired of receiving a stack of disputed tags at project closeout are not what Propeller Aero is typically brought in for.
- What can Clearstory do that Propeller Aero cannot?
- Clearstory covers Digital time and materials tags, Review and signature routing, Change order log, Cost exposure reporting. Propeller Aero covers Photogrammetric processing, AeroPoints ground control, Volume measurement, Design surface comparison.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clearstory: Is Clearstory for subcontractors or general contractors?
Both, because the workflow crosses between them. The subcontractor originates the tag, the general contractor reviews it, and adoption works best when the general contractor mandates it.
Propeller Aero: How much does Propeller cost?
The platform is quoted and not published. AeroPoints are 1,000 US dollars each, with the corrections network included for twelve months and thereafter free while a platform licence is current, otherwise 1,000 dollars a year per group.
Clearstory: Does it replace change management in Procore?
It can, for time and materials tags and the change order log, but you must decide which system is authoritative. Running both without that decision creates reconciliation work.
Propeller Aero: Do I need AeroPoints?
No, you can use conventional surveyed ground control, but the AeroPoints workflow is the main reason contractors choose Propeller over generic photogrammetry.
Clearstory: What happens on sites without signal?
Tags are captured on the device and synchronised later. Test that path with photographs attached before relying on it.
Propeller Aero: Is it survey grade?
Propeller states centimetre-level accuracy with correct ground control. Whether that satisfies a contract depends on your specification and on how the survey was flown, not on the software alone.
Propeller Aero: Who owns the data?
You retain your survey data and can export surfaces and point clouds, but check the export formats and retention terms in your contract before closeout, because bulk historical export is not a self-service one-click operation.
Related pages
More on Propeller Aero
Other head to heads
- Clearstory vs Procore
- Clearstory vs eSUB
- Clearstory vs Raken
- Clearstory vs Document Crunch
- Clearstory vs Siteline
- Clearstory vs Bridgit Bravo
- Clearstory vs GCPay
- Clearstory vs Kojo
- Clearstory vs Assignar
- Clearstory vs ConstructConnect
- Clearstory vs Reconstruct
- Clearstory vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Clearstory vs Adaptive
- Clearstory vs ALICE Technologies
- Clearstory vs B2W Estimate
- Clearstory vs Billd
- Clearstory vs Trimble
- Clearstory vs Sitemark
- Clearstory vs Handoff
- Clearstory vs RIB CostX
- Clearstory vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Clearstory vs Buildots
- Clearstory vs HammerTech
- Clearstory vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Clearstory vs Topcon MAGNET
- Clearstory vs Smartsheet Construction
- Clearstory vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Clearstory vs Trimble Pay
- Propeller Aero vs Procore
- Propeller Aero vs eSUB
- Propeller Aero vs Raken
- Propeller Aero vs Document Crunch
- Propeller Aero vs Siteline
- Propeller Aero vs Bridgit Bravo
- Propeller Aero vs GCPay
- Propeller Aero vs Kojo
- Propeller Aero vs Assignar
- Propeller Aero vs ConstructConnect
- Propeller Aero vs Reconstruct
- Propeller Aero vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Propeller Aero vs Adaptive
- Propeller Aero vs ALICE Technologies
- Propeller Aero vs B2W Estimate
- Propeller Aero vs Billd
- Propeller Aero vs Trimble
- Propeller Aero vs Sitemark
- Propeller Aero vs Handoff
- Propeller Aero vs RIB CostX
- Propeller Aero vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Propeller Aero vs Buildots
- Propeller Aero vs HammerTech
- Propeller Aero vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Propeller Aero vs Topcon MAGNET
- Propeller Aero vs Smartsheet Construction
- Propeller Aero vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Propeller Aero vs Trimble Pay
