Manufacturing · head to head
PROGNOST Systems vs Tulip

PROGNOST Systems
Manufacturing
SIL 3 rated online monitoring and diagnostics for reciprocating compressors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tulip
Manufacturing
Frontline operations platform for manufacturing
- From
- $100/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: PROGNOST Systems nothing about price is published, and because the system is instrumented per machine train, there is no per-point comparison that lets a buyer benchmark it against general-purpose condition monitoring.; Tulip minimum 10 interface commitment increases entry cost
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PROGNOST Systems and Tulip actually diverge.
| Attribute | PROGNOST Systems | Tulip |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $100/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Windows, On-premise | Web |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PROGNOST Systems
- Segmented vibration analysis
- Dynamic rod position
- Online pV diagram
- Dynamic rod load
- SIL 3 machine protection
- Damage pattern library
- PROGNOST-Predictor
- Remote expert service
Only in Tulip
Nothing recorded that PROGNOST Systems does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PROGNOST Systems
- A refinery hydrogen recycle compressor where an unplanned trip costs more per day than the monitoring systemnot Tulip
- Replacing a separate protection system and a separate condition monitoring system with one SIL 3 rated installationnot Tulip
- Gas transmission stations needing valve and rider ring wear diagnosis without opening the machinenot Tulip
- A plant moving reciprocating compressors from time-based overhaul to condition-based intervals with evidence a regulator will acceptnot Tulip
Tulip
- Production floor apps and dashboardsnot PROGNOST Systems
- Quality and assembly workflowsnot PROGNOST Systems
- Sensor data integrationnot PROGNOST Systems
- Regulated industry manufacturingnot PROGNOST Systems
- Multi-site operational dashboardsnot PROGNOST Systems
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PROGNOST Systems
- Nothing about price is published, and because the system is instrumented per machine train, there is no per-point comparison that lets a buyer benchmark it against general-purpose condition monitoring.
- Installation requires proximity probes, rod position sensors and pressure instrumentation on the machine, which usually means a planned outage and mechanical work before any data exists.
- The value is concentrated in reciprocating compressors; for general rotating equipment across a whole plant it is a far more expensive route than a broad vibration programme.
- SIL 3 certification brings the configuration into functional safety scope, so changes to thresholds and logic go through management of change rather than being adjusted by a reliability engineer.
- The company is small and German-based, so response times and spares logistics for remote sites depend on a partner network rather than a global direct service organisation.
Tulip
- Minimum 10 interface commitment increases entry cost
- Enterprise and Regulated pricing not transparent
- Complex per-interface billing model
Pricing, plan by plan
PROGNOST Systems
On request- PROGNOST-NT$undefined/year
- Priced per machine train as an instrumented system
- Sensors, proximity probes, rod position and pressure instrumentation included in scope
- Installation typically requires a machine outage for probe fitting
Tulip
$100/month- Essentials$100/month
- Apps, Tulip AI, Tables, Analytics
- Mobile/desktop/touchscreen access
- USB device integrations
- Professional$250/month
- All Essentials features
- Advanced edge connectivity
- SSO/SAML/LDAP
- Enterprise$null/month
- All Professional features
- Workspaces, app approval workflows
- Custom roles, multilingual apps
- Regulated Industries$null/month
- eSignatures (21 CFR Part 11)
- Auditable record history
- Zero data loss protection
Which should you pick?
Choose PROGNOST Systems if
- You need segmented vibration analysis.
- You work on Windows, On-premise.
- You also want dynamic rod position.
Choose Tulip if
Nothing in the data separates Tulip from PROGNOST Systems on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is PROGNOST Systems or Tulip better?
- Neither clearly leads. PROGNOST Systems starts at On request and Tulip at $100/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PROGNOST Systems or Tulip?
- PROGNOST Systems starts at On request and Tulip at $100/month.
- Does PROGNOST Systems or Tulip run on more platforms?
- PROGNOST Systems runs on Windows, On-premise. Tulip runs on Web.
- What is PROGNOST Systems best used for?
- PROGNOST Systems is most often used for a refinery hydrogen recycle compressor where an unplanned trip costs more per day than the monitoring system, replacing a separate protection system and a separate condition monitoring system with one sil 3 rated installation, gas transmission stations needing valve and rider ring wear diagnosis without opening the machine, a plant moving reciprocating compressors from time-based overhaul to condition-based intervals with evidence a regulator will accept. Of those, a refinery hydrogen recycle compressor where an unplanned trip costs more per day than the monitoring system and replacing a separate protection system and a separate condition monitoring system with one sil 3 rated installation are not what Tulip is typically brought in for.
- What can PROGNOST Systems do that Tulip cannot?
- PROGNOST Systems covers Segmented vibration analysis, Dynamic rod position, Online pV diagram, Dynamic rod load.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PROGNOST Systems: Does it replace the compressor protection system?
It can. PROGNOST-NT is SIL 3 rated for machine protection, which is the main reason sites choose it over advisory-only monitoring.
Tulip: How is Tulip pricing calculated?
Tulip pricing is based on 'Monthly Active Interfaces (MAI)', the number of devices running Tulip Player applications with activity during at least one day per month. Minimum commitment is 10 interfaces.
SourcePROGNOST Systems: Can it be retrofitted to an existing compressor?
Yes, but fitting rod position and internal instrumentation generally needs a machine outage.
Tulip: Does Tulip offer a free tier or trial?
No free plan is mentioned on the Tulip pricing page. All pricing tiers require direct contact with sales for quotes and requires a minimum 10 interface commitment.
SourcePROGNOST Systems: Does it work on centrifugal machines?
PROGNOST offers products for general rotating equipment, but the differentiated diagnostics are for reciprocating compressors.
Tulip: What is the difference between Essentials and Professional tiers?
Professional ($250/MAI/month) adds advanced edge connectivity, SSO/SAML/LDAP, 3rd-party HTTP/SQL integrations, custom widgets, and higher AI Action/automation task limits compared to Essentials ($100/MAI/month).
SourcePROGNOST Systems: Is it available on new Burckhardt machines?
Yes, Burckhardt Compression offers PROGNOST-NT as a factory-fitted condition monitoring option.
Related pages
More on PROGNOST Systems
Other head to heads
- PROGNOST Systems vs Ignition
- PROGNOST Systems vs Augury
- PROGNOST Systems vs SKF Enlight Centre
- PROGNOST Systems vs Erbessd Instruments
- PROGNOST Systems vs KCF Technologies
- PROGNOST Systems vs Petasense
- PROGNOST Systems vs Sensemore
- PROGNOST Systems vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- PROGNOST Systems vs eMaint
- PROGNOST Systems vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- PROGNOST Systems vs Poseidon Systems
- PROGNOST Systems vs MOVUS
- PROGNOST Systems vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- PROGNOST Systems vs Simplify3D
- PROGNOST Systems vs TrendMiner
- PROGNOST Systems vs Xometry
- PROGNOST Systems vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- PROGNOST Systems vs Prodsmart
- PROGNOST Systems vs MachineMetrics
- PROGNOST Systems vs Fulcrum
- PROGNOST Systems vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- PROGNOST Systems vs QAD Redzone
- PROGNOST Systems vs SolidWorks
- PROGNOST Systems vs Authentise
- PROGNOST Systems vs Flow Software
- PROGNOST Systems vs Guidewheel
- PROGNOST Systems vs Oqton
- PROGNOST Systems vs 3YOURMIND
- PROGNOST Systems vs Kepware Server
- PROGNOST Systems vs Litmus Edge
- PROGNOST Systems vs Maintenance Connection
- PROGNOST Systems vs Markforged Eiger
- PROGNOST Systems vs Materialise Magics
- PROGNOST Systems vs Fusion 360
- Tulip vs Ignition
- Tulip vs Augury
- Tulip vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Tulip vs Erbessd Instruments
- Tulip vs KCF Technologies
- Tulip vs Petasense
- Tulip vs Sensemore
- Tulip vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Tulip vs eMaint
- Tulip vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Tulip vs Poseidon Systems
- Tulip vs MOVUS
- Tulip vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Tulip vs Simplify3D
- Tulip vs TrendMiner
- Tulip vs Xometry
- Tulip vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Tulip vs Prodsmart
- Tulip vs MachineMetrics
- Tulip vs Fulcrum
- Tulip vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Tulip vs QAD Redzone
- Tulip vs SolidWorks
- Tulip vs Authentise
- Tulip vs Flow Software
- Tulip vs Guidewheel
- Tulip vs Oqton
- Tulip vs 3YOURMIND
- Tulip vs Kepware Server
- Tulip vs Litmus Edge
- Tulip vs Maintenance Connection
- Tulip vs Markforged Eiger
- Tulip vs Materialise Magics
- Tulip vs Fusion 360
