APIs · head to head
PocketBase vs Windmill

PocketBase
APIs
Open-source backend with REST API, real-time subscriptions and Admin UI
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Windmill
Automation Integration
Open-source developer platform for building scripts, workflows, and internal apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: PocketBase requires technical expertise to deploy and maintain; Windmill free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- They diverge on capability: PocketBase covers REST API, Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PocketBase and Windmill actually diverge.
| Attribute | PocketBase | Windmill |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | open-source |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD | web, api, linux, windows, mac |
| Category | APIs | Automation Integration |
| Founded | 2021 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PocketBase
- REST API
- Real-time subscriptions
- Admin UI
- SQLite
- Webhooks
- File storage
- Go support
- Docker support
Only in Windmill
- Script-to-workflow engine
- Auto-generated UIs
- Self-hosted deployment
- Git sync
- SSO support
- Audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PocketBase
- Embedded realtime database with REST APInot Windmill
- Backend-as-a-service for single-file deploymentsnot Windmill
- Rapid application development with email/OAuth2 authenticationnot Windmill
- File storage and media attachment managementnot Windmill
- Lightweight alternative to Firebase or traditional backend infrastructurenot Windmill
- Go and JavaScript customisable application frameworknot Windmill
Windmill
- Turning ad-hoc scripts into scheduled jobs and APIsnot PocketBase
- Building internal tools from existing Python/TypeScript codenot PocketBase
- Self-hosted automation for engineering teamsnot PocketBase
- Orchestrating multi-language workflowsnot PocketBase
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PocketBase
- Requires technical expertise to deploy and maintain
- No built-in hosting provided
- Community support only
Windmill
- Free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- Compute unit and seat-based pricing (developer vs. operator seats, worker compute units) adds pricing complexity beyond a flat monthly fee.
- Email triggers are capped at 100/day on the free tier, limiting event-driven use cases without upgrading.
- Smaller ecosystem of pre-built integrations compared to more established automation tools like n8n.
Pricing, plan by plan
PocketBase
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PocketBase review.
Windmill
Free- Free / Open-sourceFree
- Unlimited executions
- Self-hosted deployment
- Max 10 users with SSO
- Enterprise$120/month
- Unlimited executions and workspaces
- Uncapped SSO seats
- 24/7 priority support (3-hour response)
Which should you pick?
Choose PocketBase if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- You also want real-time subscriptions.
Choose Windmill if
- You need script-to-workflow engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- You also want auto-generated uis.
Questions people ask
- Is PocketBase or Windmill better?
- Neither clearly leads. PocketBase starts at Free and Windmill at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PocketBase or Windmill?
- PocketBase starts at Free and Windmill at Free.
- Does PocketBase or Windmill run on more platforms?
- PocketBase runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD. Windmill runs on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- Can I use PocketBase for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is PocketBase best used for?
- PocketBase is most often used for embedded realtime database with rest api, backend-as-a-service for single-file deployments, rapid application development with email/oauth2 authentication, file storage and media attachment management. Of those, embedded realtime database with rest api and backend-as-a-service for single-file deployments are not what Windmill is typically brought in for.
- What can PocketBase do that Windmill cannot?
- PocketBase covers REST API, Real-time subscriptions, Admin UI, SQLite. Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine, Auto-generated UIs, Self-hosted deployment, Git sync.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PocketBase: How much does PocketBase cost?
PocketBase is completely free and open-source. It is a self-hosted backend solution with database, authentication, and file storage capabilities at no cost.
SourceWindmill: What does Windmill cost?
Windmill's Free and Open-source edition is $0/month for self-hosted use with unlimited executions, while Enterprise starts at $120/month with unlimited workspaces and uncapped SSO seats, priced further by developer/operator seats and compute units.
SourcePocketBase: Is PocketBase open-source?
Yes, PocketBase is open-source software. You can download, modify, and deploy it yourself at no cost with no licensing restrictions.
SourceWindmill: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
The free self-hosted plan supports unlimited executions but caps SSO at 10 users, workspaces at 3, groups/permissions at 4, and email triggers at 100 per day.
SourceWindmill: How is usage metered on Windmill Enterprise?
Enterprise usage is metered through seats (developer seats at $20/month, operator seats at $10/month) and compute units, e.g. $100/month for 2 standard-worker compute units.
SourceWindmill: What happens to a self-hosted Windmill deployment if the company shuts down?
The pricing page addresses this directly as an FAQ topic, noting that self-hosted applications built on the open-source edition can continue running independently of Windmill the company.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- PocketBase vs Appwrite
- PocketBase vs Hasura
- PocketBase vs Bruno
- PocketBase vs HTTPie
- PocketBase vs Backendless
- PocketBase vs Directus
- PocketBase vs Strapi
- PocketBase vs Hoppscotch
- PocketBase vs Janus Gateway
- PocketBase vs KeystoneJS
- PocketBase vs Kong
- PocketBase vs Thunder Client
- PocketBase vs Yapily
- PocketBase vs 10x Banking
- PocketBase vs Brite Payments
- PocketBase vs Bud Financial
- PocketBase vs Episode Six
- PocketBase vs n8n
- PocketBase vs Nango
- PocketBase vs Airbyte
- PocketBase vs Flowable
- PocketBase vs Meltano
- PocketBase vs RudderStack
- PocketBase vs Grouparoo
- PocketBase vs Activiti
- PocketBase vs jBPM
- PocketBase vs Merge
- PocketBase vs Camunda
- PocketBase vs Flowise
- PocketBase vs Automate.io
- PocketBase vs Autonoly
- PocketBase vs Boomi
- PocketBase vs Browser Use
- PocketBase vs Browserbase
- Windmill vs Appwrite
- Windmill vs Hasura
- Windmill vs Bruno
- Windmill vs HTTPie
- Windmill vs Backendless
- Windmill vs Directus
- Windmill vs Strapi
- Windmill vs Hoppscotch
- Windmill vs Janus Gateway
- Windmill vs KeystoneJS
- Windmill vs Kong
- Windmill vs Thunder Client
- Windmill vs Yapily
- Windmill vs 10x Banking
- Windmill vs Brite Payments
- Windmill vs Bud Financial
- Windmill vs Episode Six
- Windmill vs n8n
- Windmill vs Nango
- Windmill vs Airbyte
- Windmill vs Flowable
- Windmill vs Meltano
- Windmill vs RudderStack
- Windmill vs Grouparoo
- Windmill vs Activiti
- Windmill vs jBPM
- Windmill vs Merge
- Windmill vs Camunda
- Windmill vs Flowise
- Windmill vs Automate.io
- Windmill vs Autonoly
- Windmill vs Boomi
- Windmill vs Browser Use
- Windmill vs Browserbase
