APIs · head to head
Appwrite vs PocketBase

PocketBase
APIs
Open-source backend with REST API, real-time subscriptions and Admin UI
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Appwrite smaller ecosystem compared to Firebase; fewer third-party integrations and extensions; PocketBase requires technical expertise to deploy and maintain
- They diverge on capability: Appwrite covers Authentication, PocketBase covers Real-time subscriptions.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Appwrite and PocketBase actually diverge.
| Attribute | Appwrite | PocketBase |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Cloud (Managed), Self-Hosted, Docker | Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD |
| Founded | 2019 | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Appwrite
- Authentication
- Database
- Multiple SDKs
- Cloud functions
- Cloud support
- Kubernetes support
Only in PocketBase
- Real-time subscriptions
- Admin UI
- SQLite
- Webhooks
- Go support
Both cover
- REST API
- File storage
- Docker support
- Self-hosted support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Appwrite
- API Developmentnot PocketBase
- API Gatewaynot PocketBase
- API Testingnot PocketBase
- API Documentationnot PocketBase
- Microservicesnot PocketBase
PocketBase
- Embedded realtime database with REST APInot Appwrite
- Backend-as-a-service for single-file deploymentsnot Appwrite
- Rapid application development with email/OAuth2 authenticationnot Appwrite
- File storage and media attachment managementnot Appwrite
- Lightweight alternative to Firebase or traditional backend infrastructurenot Appwrite
- Go and JavaScript customisable application frameworknot Appwrite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Appwrite
- Smaller ecosystem compared to Firebase; fewer third-party integrations and extensions
- Analytics, crash reporting, and A/B testing not included (Firebase includes these)
- Requires infrastructure management for self-hosted deployments; not fully managed like Firebase Cloud
- Mobile app support not as mature as Firebase's native iOS/Android SDKs
PocketBase
- Requires technical expertise to deploy and maintain
- No built-in hosting provided
- Community support only
Pricing, plan by plan
Appwrite
Free- Cloud FreeFree
- 75K MAU
- 10GB storage
- Unlimited projects
- Cloud Pro$15/month
- More storage
- Priority support
PocketBase
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PocketBase review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Appwrite if
- You need authentication.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud (Managed), Self-Hosted, Docker.
- You also want database.
Choose PocketBase if
- You need real-time subscriptions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- You also want admin ui.
Questions people ask
- Is Appwrite or PocketBase better?
- Neither clearly leads. Appwrite starts at Free and PocketBase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Appwrite or PocketBase?
- Appwrite starts at Free and PocketBase at Free.
- Does Appwrite or PocketBase run on more platforms?
- Appwrite runs on Cloud (Managed), Self-Hosted, Docker. PocketBase runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- Can I use Appwrite for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Appwrite best used for?
- Appwrite is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what PocketBase is typically brought in for.
- What can Appwrite do that PocketBase cannot?
- Appwrite covers Authentication, Database, Multiple SDKs, Cloud functions. PocketBase covers Real-time subscriptions, Admin UI, SQLite, Webhooks. Both handle REST API, File storage, Docker support, Self-hosted support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Appwrite: Can Appwrite be self-hosted?
Yes. Appwrite is fully open-source and self-hosted with a single Docker command. Self-hosting is completely free with no feature restrictions, unlike the managed Appwrite Cloud.
SourcePocketBase: How much does PocketBase cost?
PocketBase is completely free and open-source. It is a self-hosted backend solution with database, authentication, and file storage capabilities at no cost.
SourceAppwrite: What is Appwrite Cloud's pricing?
Appwrite Cloud offers a free tier with unlimited projects, 75K monthly active users, and 10GB storage with no time limit. Pro plan starts at $15/month per organization member. Scale plan at $599/month includes dedicated resources and SOC 2 compliance.
SourcePocketBase: Is PocketBase open-source?
Yes, PocketBase is open-source software. You can download, modify, and deploy it yourself at no cost with no licensing restrictions.
SourceAppwrite: What programming languages does Appwrite support?
Appwrite provides SDKs for 15+ languages including JavaScript, Flutter, Swift, Kotlin, Python, Ruby, PHP, .NET, and more, offering more language flexibility than Firebase.
SourceAppwrite: What backend services does Appwrite provide?
Appwrite includes Auth (with multi-factor auth), Databases, Storage (with compression and encryption), Serverless Functions, Messaging, Realtime subscriptions, and Sites (for hosting static and full-stack apps).
SourceAppwrite: Does Appwrite include real-time capabilities?
Yes. Appwrite's Realtime service covers all platform services by default through WebSocket subscriptions, enabling real-time updates across databases, functions, and messages.
SourceAppwrite: How does Appwrite compare to Firebase on costs?
Appwrite offers better cost predictability. Firebase's pay-per-read/write model can lead to unexpected bills with runaway queries, while Appwrite's self-hosted model only requires paying for your own infrastructure with completely predictable costs.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Appwrite vs Parse Server
- Appwrite vs Hasura
- Appwrite vs Directus
- Appwrite vs Tyk
- Appwrite vs Backendless
- Appwrite vs Strapi
- Appwrite vs Gravitee
- Appwrite vs Hoppscotch
- Appwrite vs Bruno
- Appwrite vs KeystoneJS
- Appwrite vs Kong
- Appwrite vs Salt Edge
- Appwrite vs Skyflow
- Appwrite vs Yodlee
- Appwrite vs Backbase
- Appwrite vs Enfuce
- Appwrite vs Griffin
- Appwrite vs HTTPie
- Appwrite vs Janus Gateway
- Appwrite vs Thunder Client
- Appwrite vs Yapily
- Appwrite vs 10x Banking
- Appwrite vs Brite Payments
- Appwrite vs Bud Financial
- PocketBase vs Parse Server
- PocketBase vs Hasura
- PocketBase vs Directus
- PocketBase vs Tyk
- PocketBase vs Backendless
- PocketBase vs Strapi
- PocketBase vs Gravitee
- PocketBase vs Hoppscotch
- PocketBase vs Bruno
- PocketBase vs KeystoneJS
- PocketBase vs Kong
- PocketBase vs Salt Edge
- PocketBase vs Skyflow
- PocketBase vs Yodlee
- PocketBase vs Backbase
- PocketBase vs Enfuce
- PocketBase vs Griffin
- PocketBase vs HTTPie
- PocketBase vs Janus Gateway
- PocketBase vs Thunder Client
- PocketBase vs Yapily
- PocketBase vs 10x Banking
- PocketBase vs Brite Payments
- PocketBase vs Bud Financial

