Cybersecurity · head to head
Infisical vs Ping Identity

Infisical
Cybersecurity
Security infrastructure for developers and AI agents
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Infisical has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Infisical free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation; Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- They diverge on capability: Infisical covers Secrets management, Ping Identity covers Single sign-on.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Infisical and Ping Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Infisical | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $3/month |
| Pricing model | Unknown | Per user per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted | Web, Linux, Windows |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Infisical
- Secrets management
- Certificate management
- Privileged access management
- Secret versioning
- Dynamic secrets
- SAML SSO
- Open-source core
- Secrets scanning
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Infisical
- Managing secrets across Kubernetes clustersnot Ping Identity
- Automating certificate lifecycle for internal PKInot Ping Identity
- Providing privileged database access with audit trailsnot Ping Identity
- Securing credentials for AI agents at runtimenot Ping Identity
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot Infisical
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot Infisical
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot Infisical
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot Infisical
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Infisical
- Free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation
- Pricing tiers are per-identity, which scales costs with team size
- Certificate management requires Enterprise plan for advanced features like wildcards
- Privileged access tier is separate billing from secrets management
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Infisical
Free- FreeFree
- 5 identities
- Unlimited projects
- 3 environments
- Pro - Secrets$20/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Pro - Secrets (Annual)$20/year
- Annual discount available
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Advanced - Secrets$40/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Dynamic secrets
- Gateways
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Which should you pick?
Choose Infisical if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted.
- You also want certificate management.
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Questions people ask
- Is Infisical or Ping Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Infisical starts at Free and Ping Identity at $3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Infisical or Ping Identity?
- Infisical has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Infisical and $3/month for Ping Identity.
- Does Infisical or Ping Identity run on more platforms?
- Infisical runs on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted. Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- Can I use Infisical for free?
- Yes. Infisical has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Ping Identity starts at $3/month.
- What is Infisical best used for?
- Infisical is most often used for managing secrets across kubernetes clusters, automating certificate lifecycle for internal pki, providing privileged database access with audit trails, securing credentials for ai agents at runtime. Of those, managing secrets across kubernetes clusters and automating certificate lifecycle for internal pki are not what Ping Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can Infisical do that Ping Identity cannot?
- Infisical covers Secrets management, Certificate management, Privileged access management, Secret versioning. Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Infisical: How is pricing calculated for Secrets Management?
Pricing is per-identity per month. Free tier includes 5 identities. Pro tier is $20/identity/month, Advanced is $40/identity/month. All pricing in USD.
SourcePing Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
Infisical: Can I self-host Infisical?
Yes, Infisical's core is open-source under the MIT license and can be self-hosted. The managed cloud service is also available with additional features.
SourcePing Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
Infisical: What is included in the Enterprise plan?
Enterprise plan includes SCIM, LDAP, approval workflows, external KMS/HSM support, and 99.99% SLA. Pricing is custom and determined by annual commitment.
SourcePing Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
Related pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- Infisical vs Akeyless
- Infisical vs Doppler
- Infisical vs HashiCorp Vault
- Infisical vs Chainguard
- Infisical vs Authelia
- Infisical vs Bitwarden
- Infisical vs Delinea
- Infisical vs Semgrep
- Infisical vs Trivy
- Infisical vs Grype
- Infisical vs Ory Kratos
- Infisical vs Legit Security
- Infisical vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Infisical vs Metasploit
- Infisical vs MetricStream
- Infisical vs Microsoft Defender
- Infisical vs Ory
- Infisical vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Infisical vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Infisical vs Frontegg
- Infisical vs Speakeasy
- Infisical vs authentik
- Infisical vs Logto
- Infisical vs Transmit Security
- Infisical vs Genetec Security Center
- Infisical vs VMware Carbon Black
- Infisical vs Rhombus Systems
- Infisical vs Yoti
- Infisical vs Avast One
- Infisical vs Cosign
- Infisical vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs Doppler
- Ping Identity vs HashiCorp Vault
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Bitwarden
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Semgrep
- Ping Identity vs Trivy
- Ping Identity vs Grype
- Ping Identity vs Ory Kratos
- Ping Identity vs Legit Security
- Ping Identity vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Ping Identity vs Metasploit
- Ping Identity vs MetricStream
- Ping Identity vs Microsoft Defender
- Ping Identity vs Ory
- Ping Identity vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
