Cybersecurity · head to head
Ping Identity vs Tenable

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -

Tenable
Cybersecurity
AI-powered exposure management platform for unified security visibility
- From
- $3500/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.; Tenable pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- They diverge on capability: Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Tenable covers Unified attack surface mapping.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ping Identity and Tenable actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ping Identity | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3/month | $3500/year |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows | Cloud, Web |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
Only in Tenable
- Unified attack surface mapping
- Exposure intelligence enrichment
- Tenable Hexa AI orchestration
- Cloud Exposure (CNAPP)
- OT Exposure
- Identity Exposure
- Vulnerability Management
- Attack Surface Management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot Tenable
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot Tenable
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot Tenable
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot Tenable
Tenable
- Comprehensive vulnerability scanning for enterprise networksnot Ping Identity
- Cloud security monitoring and compliance for AWS, Azure, GCPnot Ping Identity
- Identity and access management risk assessmentnot Ping Identity
- Operational technology security for industrial systemsnot Ping Identity
- Attack surface management for third-party risknot Ping Identity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Tenable
- Pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- Many enterprise features require custom quote and sales engagement
- Cloud Exposure, OT Exposure, and other modules have no published pricing
- Multi-year contracts common, limiting flexibility
- Setup and configuration complexity for enterprise deployments
Pricing, plan by plan
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Tenable
$3500/year- Tenable One Vulnerability Management$3500/year
- Per 100 assets
- Multi-year discounts available
- Tenable One Web App Scanning$3578/year
- Per 5 FQDNs
- Annual subscription
- Nessus Professional$4790/year
- Vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
- Nessus Expert$6790/year
- Advanced vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
Which should you pick?
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Choose Tenable if
- You need unified attack surface mapping.
- You work on Cloud, Web.
- You also want exposure intelligence enrichment.
Questions people ask
- Is Ping Identity or Tenable better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ping Identity starts at $3/month and Tenable at $3500/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ping Identity or Tenable?
- Ping Identity starts at $3/month and Tenable at $3500/year.
- Does Ping Identity or Tenable run on more platforms?
- Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows. Tenable runs on Cloud, Web.
- What is Ping Identity best used for?
- Ping Identity is most often used for a bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running saas identity elsewhere, an airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scale, an enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendors, an existing forgerock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under ping ownership. Of those, a bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running saas identity elsewhere and an airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scale are not what Tenable is typically brought in for.
- What can Ping Identity do that Tenable cannot?
- Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management. Tenable covers Unified attack surface mapping, Exposure intelligence enrichment, Tenable Hexa AI orchestration, Cloud Exposure (CNAPP).
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
Tenable: How is Tenable One pricing structured?
Tenable One Vulnerability Management costs $3500/year per 100 assets. Web App Scanning is $3578/year per 5 FQDNs. Multi-year discounts are available.
SourcePing Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
Tenable: What is the difference between Nessus Professional and Nessus Expert?
Nessus Professional costs $4790/year and provides core vulnerability scanning. Nessus Expert costs $6790/year and offers advanced scanning capabilities.
SourcePing Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
Tenable: Are custom support and training available for Tenable?
Yes. Optional advanced support is available for $400/year. Training courses range from $275-$385/year.
SourceRelated pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs Netwrix
- Ping Identity vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Ping Identity vs Qualys VMDR
- Ping Identity vs Aikido
- Ping Identity vs Arnica
- Ping Identity vs Doppler
- Ping Identity vs Recorded Future
- Ping Identity vs Sysdig
- Ping Identity vs Endor Labs
- Ping Identity vs Tanium
- Ping Identity vs Enpass
- Ping Identity vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Ping Identity vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Ping Identity vs HID Global
- Ping Identity vs IBM QRadar
- Tenable vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Tenable vs Frontegg
- Tenable vs Speakeasy
- Tenable vs Akeyless
- Tenable vs authentik
- Tenable vs Logto
- Tenable vs Authelia
- Tenable vs Transmit Security
- Tenable vs Delinea
- Tenable vs Genetec Security Center
- Tenable vs VMware Carbon Black
- Tenable vs Rhombus Systems
- Tenable vs Yoti
- Tenable vs Avast One
- Tenable vs Chainguard
- Tenable vs Cosign
- Tenable vs CyberGhost VPN
- Tenable vs Netwrix
- Tenable vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Tenable vs Qualys VMDR
- Tenable vs Aikido
- Tenable vs Arnica
- Tenable vs Doppler
- Tenable vs Recorded Future
- Tenable vs Sysdig
- Tenable vs Endor Labs
- Tenable vs Tanium
- Tenable vs Enpass
- Tenable vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Tenable vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Tenable vs HID Global
- Tenable vs IBM QRadar
