Networking · head to head
pfSense vs Terragrunt

pfSense
Networking
Open source firewall software with a free Community Edition and a separate commercial Plus edition sold by Netgate
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Terragrunt
Cloud
The Open Source IaC Orchestrator Platform Teams Trust
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: pfSense pfSense CE and pfSense Plus are not simply the same software with a support contract layered on top; Plus is a separately developed edition with its own feature set, and moving between them is a migration, not a toggle; Terragrunt additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- They diverge on capability: pfSense covers Stateful firewall and NAT, Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which pfSense and Terragrunt actually diverge.
| Attribute | pfSense | Terragrunt |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source Community Edition, free; commercial Plus edition sold separately by Netgate | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux | AWS, Azure, GCP |
| Category | Networking | Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in pfSense
- Stateful firewall and NAT
- VPN support
- Traffic shaping and QoS
- Package ecosystem
- CE and Plus editions
Only in Terragrunt
- Infrastructure orchestration
- Run Queue
- DRY configuration
- Automated hooks
- Infrastructure catalog
- Least-privilege access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
pfSense
- A home user or small business wanting a free, fully-featured firewall on commodity hardware with no licence costnot Terragrunt
- A business wanting an integrated firewall appliance with vendor support, typically buying a Netgate appliance bundled with pfSense Plusnot Terragrunt
- A team wanting to evaluate advanced features like real-time threat intelligence before committing to Netgate hardware or a Plus migrationnot Terragrunt
- An organisation replacing an expensive commercial firewall with an open source alternative while retaining the option to add commercial support laternot Terragrunt
Terragrunt
- Organizing Terraform code across multiple environmentsnot pfSense
- Automating infrastructure deployment workflowsnot pfSense
- Implementing infrastructure as code templates for developer self-servicenot pfSense
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
pfSense
- pfSense CE and pfSense Plus are not simply the same software with a support contract layered on top; Plus is a separately developed edition with its own feature set, and moving between them is a migration, not a toggle
- Running Plus on non-Netgate hardware depends on Netgate's current migration terms, which have changed over time, so a buyer planning to use white-box hardware with Plus should verify current eligibility rather than assume it works as it did previously
- CE has no official vendor support channel; a business relying on it for production firewalling without a support contract is self-supporting on community forums
- Some newer features and threat intelligence integrations are Plus-only, so CE users do not get feature parity going forward even though both editions remain under active development
- Netgate's own appliance pricing and the terms of the CE-to-Plus migration path are not always clearly presented in one place, requiring some digging to understand the real total cost of a Plus deployment on non-Netgate hardware
- As with any self-managed firewall, security depends on the operator applying updates and correctly configuring rules; there is no managed security operations layer included even in Plus
Terragrunt
- Additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- Requires understanding of Terraform concepts
- Paid tier pricing not clearly published
Pricing, plan by plan
pfSense
Free- pfSense CEFree
- Full firewall and routing functionality
- No vendor lock-in to hardware
- Community support
- pfSense Plus (via Netgate appliance)$undefined/one-time
- Bundled with Netgate hardware appliances from around $189
- Threat intelligence feeds
- Certified support tiers
Terragrunt
Free- Open SourceFree
- Terragrunt CLI - completely free
- Community support
- Terragrunt Scale FreeFree
- Free CI/CD pipeline
- Unlimited runs and resources
- For up to 25 infrastructure units
- Terragrunt Scale Paid$undefined/custom
- Volume pricing for more than 25 infrastructure units
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose pfSense if
- You need stateful firewall and nat.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want vpn support.
Choose Terragrunt if
- You need infrastructure orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want run queue.
Questions people ask
- Is pfSense or Terragrunt better?
- Neither clearly leads. pfSense starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, pfSense or Terragrunt?
- pfSense starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free.
- Does pfSense or Terragrunt run on more platforms?
- pfSense runs on Linux. Terragrunt runs on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- Can I use pfSense for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is pfSense best used for?
- pfSense is most often used for a home user or small business wanting a free, fully-featured firewall on commodity hardware with no licence cost, a business wanting an integrated firewall appliance with vendor support, typically buying a netgate appliance bundled with pfsense plus, a team wanting to evaluate advanced features like real-time threat intelligence before committing to netgate hardware or a plus migration, an organisation replacing an expensive commercial firewall with an open source alternative while retaining the option to add commercial support later. Of those, a home user or small business wanting a free, fully-featured firewall on commodity hardware with no licence cost and a business wanting an integrated firewall appliance with vendor support, typically buying a netgate appliance bundled with pfsense plus are not what Terragrunt is typically brought in for.
- What can pfSense do that Terragrunt cannot?
- pfSense covers Stateful firewall and NAT, VPN support, Traffic shaping and QoS, Package ecosystem. Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration, Run Queue, DRY configuration, Automated hooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
pfSense: What is the difference between pfSense CE and pfSense Plus?
CE is the free, open source edition installable on any compatible hardware; Plus is a commercial edition from Netgate with additional features and support, typically bundled with Netgate appliances.
Terragrunt: Is Terragrunt free?
Yes, the Terragrunt CLI is completely free and open source. Terragrunt Scale offers a free tier for up to 25 infrastructure units.
SourcepfSense: Can I run pfSense Plus on my own hardware?
It is possible through a migration from a CE installation via Netgate's official channel, but the terms and availability of that path have changed over time and should be confirmed directly with Netgate.
Terragrunt: What is the difference between Terragrunt and Terraform?
Terragrunt is an orchestration layer on top of Terraform that handles state management, DRY principles, and deployment automation without replacing Terraform itself.
SourcepfSense: Is pfSense CE really free with no catch?
Yes, CE has no licence fee and no hardware lock-in, though it comes with community rather than vendor support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- pfSense vs MikroTik RouterOS
- pfSense vs OpenVPN
- pfSense vs Cisco Meraki
- pfSense vs Juniper Mist
- pfSense vs LibreNMS
- pfSense vs Icinga
- pfSense vs OPNsense
- pfSense vs Zabbix
- pfSense vs Traefik
- pfSense vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- pfSense vs Nebula
- pfSense vs Consul
- pfSense vs Domotz
- pfSense vs Headscale
- pfSense vs HiveMQ
- pfSense vs Netdata
- pfSense vs ThousandEyes
- pfSense vs Pulumi
- pfSense vs Infracost
- pfSense vs Packer
- pfSense vs Serverless Framework
- pfSense vs SST
- pfSense vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- pfSense vs Cerebrium
- pfSense vs Go
- pfSense vs Rancher
- pfSense vs Anyscale
- pfSense vs Linkerd
- pfSense vs Microsoft Azure
- pfSense vs Nitric
- pfSense vs OpenEBS
- pfSense vs OVHcloud
- pfSense vs Nomad
- pfSense vs Vagrant
- Terragrunt vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Terragrunt vs OpenVPN
- Terragrunt vs Cisco Meraki
- Terragrunt vs Juniper Mist
- Terragrunt vs LibreNMS
- Terragrunt vs Icinga
- Terragrunt vs OPNsense
- Terragrunt vs Zabbix
- Terragrunt vs Traefik
- Terragrunt vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Terragrunt vs Nebula
- Terragrunt vs Consul
- Terragrunt vs Domotz
- Terragrunt vs Headscale
- Terragrunt vs HiveMQ
- Terragrunt vs Netdata
- Terragrunt vs ThousandEyes
- Terragrunt vs Pulumi
- Terragrunt vs Infracost
- Terragrunt vs Packer
- Terragrunt vs Serverless Framework
- Terragrunt vs SST
- Terragrunt vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Terragrunt vs Cerebrium
- Terragrunt vs Go
- Terragrunt vs Rancher
- Terragrunt vs Anyscale
- Terragrunt vs Linkerd
- Terragrunt vs Microsoft Azure
- Terragrunt vs Nitric
- Terragrunt vs OpenEBS
- Terragrunt vs OVHcloud
- Terragrunt vs Nomad
- Terragrunt vs Vagrant
