Government · head to head
Periscope Holdings vs WireGuard

Periscope Holdings
Government
Statewide e-procurement systems and supplier networks for large public agencies
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

WireGuard
Cybersecurity
Modern, minimal-complexity VPN protocol with state-of-the-art cryptography
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only WireGuard has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Periscope Holdings it is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.; WireGuard manual key management required; WireGuard does not provide automated peer discovery or key distribution mechanisms
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Periscope Holdings and WireGuard actually diverge.
| Attribute | Periscope Holdings | WireGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, FreeBSD, OpenBSD |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Periscope Holdings
- Sealed bid solicitation
- Supplier registration network
- Contract catalogues
- Cooperative purchasing
- Spend and compliance reporting
- Supplier diversity tracking
Only in WireGuard
Nothing recorded that Periscope Holdings does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Periscope Holdings
- A state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entitiesnot WireGuard
- A large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening recordnot WireGuard
- A purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entitiesnot WireGuard
- A state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contractsnot WireGuard
WireGuard
- Site-to-site VPN connectivity for datacentres and branch officesnot Periscope Holdings
- High-performance VPN applications requiring minimal latency and CPU overheadnot Periscope Holdings
- Embedded systems and IoT devices with strict memory and storage constraintsnot Periscope Holdings
- WireGuard-based managed services (Tailscale, Mullvad VPN) providing abstraction over raw protocolnot Periscope Holdings
- Kernel module for Linux-based VPN appliances and firewallsnot Periscope Holdings
- Research and development in cryptographic protocol designnot Periscope Holdings
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Periscope Holdings
- It is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- The interface reflects the age and regulatory weight of the platform, and suppliers routinely describe registration and bidding as harder than on newer portals, which can suppress bid response.
- Ownership has changed twice since 2021, from independent to mdf commerce to KKR, so roadmap and support continuity should be written into the contract rather than assumed.
- Sibling products inside mdf commerce cover adjacent procurement ground, which means an apparently competitive shortlist may contain two products with the same owner.
- Statewide implementations are multi year projects with heavy configuration and change management, and the professional services cost commonly exceeds the software over the contract term.
WireGuard
- Manual key management required; WireGuard does not provide automated peer discovery or key distribution mechanisms
- No built-in support for address allocation or DHCP; all IP assignments must be manually configured
- Limited to UDP; TCP encapsulation requires wrapper tools, making it unsuitable for environments blocking UDP
- Stateless protocol design means lost packets trigger peer disconnection rather than transparent reconnection
- Requires operational expertise to securely configure and deploy; not suitable for non-technical users without wrapper tools (Tailscale, Mullvad)
Pricing, plan by plan
Periscope Holdings
On request- BuySpeed$undefined/year
- Quoted per programme, scaled to entities served and transaction volume
- Multi year statewide contracts with implementation priced separately
- Supplier side registration fees form part of the commercial model on some programmes
WireGuard
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the WireGuard review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Periscope Holdings if
- You need sealed bid solicitation.
- You also want supplier registration network.
Choose WireGuard if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, FreeBSD, OpenBSD.
Questions people ask
- Is Periscope Holdings or WireGuard better?
- Neither clearly leads. Periscope Holdings starts at On request and WireGuard at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Periscope Holdings or WireGuard?
- WireGuard has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Periscope Holdings and Free for WireGuard.
- Does Periscope Holdings or WireGuard run on more platforms?
- Periscope Holdings runs on Web. WireGuard runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, FreeBSD, OpenBSD.
- Can I use WireGuard for free?
- Yes. WireGuard has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Periscope Holdings starts at On request.
- What is Periscope Holdings best used for?
- Periscope Holdings is most often used for a state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entities, a large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening record, a purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entities, a state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contracts. Of those, a state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entities and a large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening record are not what WireGuard is typically brought in for.
- What can Periscope Holdings do that WireGuard cannot?
- Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation, Supplier registration network, Contract catalogues, Cooperative purchasing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Periscope Holdings: Who owns Periscope Holdings?
mdf commerce acquired it in 2021, and mdf commerce was itself acquired by KKR in 2024.
WireGuard: Is WireGuard free?
Yes, WireGuard is free and open-source software. The Linux kernel module is licensed under GPLv2; implementations for other platforms use MIT or Apache 2.0 licences. There are no licensing fees.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Is it suitable for a single city?
Usually not. It is built and priced for statewide or very large agency programmes.
WireGuard: How does WireGuard differ from IPsec and OpenVPN?
WireGuard replaces complex negotiation protocols and state machines with simple public-key cryptography. Its code is roughly 100 times smaller than IPsec, making it faster to audit, deploy, and maintain. It uses modern cryptographic primitives rather than legacy algorithms.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: What is BuySpeed?
The e-procurement platform behind its statewide deployments, covering solicitation through catalogue ordering and reporting.
WireGuard: Can I use WireGuard for a commercial VPN service?
Yes. Several commercial VPN services (Mullvad, IVPN, ProtonVPN) use WireGuard as their underlying protocol. You must implement peer management, key distribution, and endpoint selection on top of the WireGuard protocol.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Can we see what a state paid?
Yes. State procurement awards are public records and typically disclose the full multi year contract value.
Related pages
More on Periscope Holdings
Other head to heads
- Periscope Holdings vs Euna Solutions
- Periscope Holdings vs Bidnet Direct
- Periscope Holdings vs OpenGov
- Periscope Holdings vs Bonfire
- Periscope Holdings vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Periscope Holdings vs NEOGOV
- Periscope Holdings vs ArchiveSocial
- Periscope Holdings vs Clariti
- Periscope Holdings vs GovPilot
- Periscope Holdings vs mySidewalk
- Periscope Holdings vs SAP for Government
- Periscope Holdings vs Axon Records
- Periscope Holdings vs CitizenLab
- Periscope Holdings vs ClearGov
- Periscope Holdings vs eCode360
- Periscope Holdings vs MyRec.com
- Periscope Holdings vs DemandStar
- Periscope Holdings vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Periscope Holdings vs 1Password
- Periscope Holdings vs Norton 360
- Periscope Holdings vs LastPass
- Periscope Holdings vs Falco
- Periscope Holdings vs Chainguard
- Periscope Holdings vs Jamf Pro
- Periscope Holdings vs SonicWall
- Periscope Holdings vs Snyk
- Periscope Holdings vs Bitwarden
- Periscope Holdings vs Brave Browser
- Periscope Holdings vs Infisical
- Periscope Holdings vs DTiQ
- Periscope Holdings vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Periscope Holdings vs ExpressVPN
- Periscope Holdings vs Fenergo
- Periscope Holdings vs Google Authenticator
- WireGuard vs Euna Solutions
- WireGuard vs Bidnet Direct
- WireGuard vs OpenGov
- WireGuard vs Bonfire
- WireGuard vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- WireGuard vs NEOGOV
- WireGuard vs ArchiveSocial
- WireGuard vs Clariti
- WireGuard vs GovPilot
- WireGuard vs mySidewalk
- WireGuard vs SAP for Government
- WireGuard vs Axon Records
- WireGuard vs CitizenLab
- WireGuard vs ClearGov
- WireGuard vs eCode360
- WireGuard vs MyRec.com
- WireGuard vs DemandStar
- WireGuard vs Bitdefender Total Security
- WireGuard vs 1Password
- WireGuard vs Norton 360
- WireGuard vs LastPass
- WireGuard vs Falco
- WireGuard vs Chainguard
- WireGuard vs Jamf Pro
- WireGuard vs SonicWall
- WireGuard vs Snyk
- WireGuard vs Bitwarden
- WireGuard vs Brave Browser
- WireGuard vs Infisical
- WireGuard vs DTiQ
- WireGuard vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- WireGuard vs ExpressVPN
- WireGuard vs Fenergo
- WireGuard vs Google Authenticator
