Cybersecurity · head to head
Infisical vs Periscope Holdings

Infisical
Cybersecurity
Security infrastructure for developers and AI agents
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Periscope Holdings
Government
Statewide e-procurement systems and supplier networks for large public agencies
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Infisical has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Infisical free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation; Periscope Holdings it is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- They diverge on capability: Infisical covers Secrets management, Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Infisical and Periscope Holdings actually diverge.
| Attribute | Infisical | Periscope Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Infisical
- Secrets management
- Certificate management
- Privileged access management
- Secret versioning
- Dynamic secrets
- SAML SSO
- Open-source core
- Secrets scanning
Only in Periscope Holdings
- Sealed bid solicitation
- Supplier registration network
- Contract catalogues
- Cooperative purchasing
- Spend and compliance reporting
- Supplier diversity tracking
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Infisical
- Managing secrets across Kubernetes clustersnot Periscope Holdings
- Automating certificate lifecycle for internal PKInot Periscope Holdings
- Providing privileged database access with audit trailsnot Periscope Holdings
- Securing credentials for AI agents at runtimenot Periscope Holdings
Periscope Holdings
- A state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entitiesnot Infisical
- A large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening recordnot Infisical
- A purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entitiesnot Infisical
- A state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contractsnot Infisical
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Infisical
- Free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation
- Pricing tiers are per-identity, which scales costs with team size
- Certificate management requires Enterprise plan for advanced features like wildcards
- Privileged access tier is separate billing from secrets management
Periscope Holdings
- It is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- The interface reflects the age and regulatory weight of the platform, and suppliers routinely describe registration and bidding as harder than on newer portals, which can suppress bid response.
- Ownership has changed twice since 2021, from independent to mdf commerce to KKR, so roadmap and support continuity should be written into the contract rather than assumed.
- Sibling products inside mdf commerce cover adjacent procurement ground, which means an apparently competitive shortlist may contain two products with the same owner.
- Statewide implementations are multi year projects with heavy configuration and change management, and the professional services cost commonly exceeds the software over the contract term.
Pricing, plan by plan
Infisical
Free- FreeFree
- 5 identities
- Unlimited projects
- 3 environments
- Pro - Secrets$20/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Pro - Secrets (Annual)$20/year
- Annual discount available
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Advanced - Secrets$40/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Dynamic secrets
- Gateways
Periscope Holdings
On request- BuySpeed$undefined/year
- Quoted per programme, scaled to entities served and transaction volume
- Multi year statewide contracts with implementation priced separately
- Supplier side registration fees form part of the commercial model on some programmes
Which should you pick?
Choose Infisical if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted.
- You also want certificate management.
Choose Periscope Holdings if
- You need sealed bid solicitation.
- You also want supplier registration network.
Questions people ask
- Is Infisical or Periscope Holdings better?
- Neither clearly leads. Infisical starts at Free and Periscope Holdings at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Infisical or Periscope Holdings?
- Infisical has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Infisical and On request for Periscope Holdings.
- Does Infisical or Periscope Holdings run on more platforms?
- Infisical runs on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted. Periscope Holdings runs on Web.
- Can I use Infisical for free?
- Yes. Infisical has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Periscope Holdings starts at On request.
- What is Infisical best used for?
- Infisical is most often used for managing secrets across kubernetes clusters, automating certificate lifecycle for internal pki, providing privileged database access with audit trails, securing credentials for ai agents at runtime. Of those, managing secrets across kubernetes clusters and automating certificate lifecycle for internal pki are not what Periscope Holdings is typically brought in for.
- What can Infisical do that Periscope Holdings cannot?
- Infisical covers Secrets management, Certificate management, Privileged access management, Secret versioning. Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation, Supplier registration network, Contract catalogues, Cooperative purchasing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Infisical: How is pricing calculated for Secrets Management?
Pricing is per-identity per month. Free tier includes 5 identities. Pro tier is $20/identity/month, Advanced is $40/identity/month. All pricing in USD.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Who owns Periscope Holdings?
mdf commerce acquired it in 2021, and mdf commerce was itself acquired by KKR in 2024.
Infisical: Can I self-host Infisical?
Yes, Infisical's core is open-source under the MIT license and can be self-hosted. The managed cloud service is also available with additional features.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Is it suitable for a single city?
Usually not. It is built and priced for statewide or very large agency programmes.
Infisical: What is included in the Enterprise plan?
Enterprise plan includes SCIM, LDAP, approval workflows, external KMS/HSM support, and 99.99% SLA. Pricing is custom and determined by annual commitment.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: What is BuySpeed?
The e-procurement platform behind its statewide deployments, covering solicitation through catalogue ordering and reporting.
Periscope Holdings: Can we see what a state paid?
Yes. State procurement awards are public records and typically disclose the full multi year contract value.
Related pages
More on Periscope Holdings
Other head to heads
- Infisical vs Akeyless
- Infisical vs Doppler
- Infisical vs HashiCorp Vault
- Infisical vs Chainguard
- Infisical vs Authelia
- Infisical vs Bitwarden
- Infisical vs Delinea
- Infisical vs Semgrep
- Infisical vs Trivy
- Infisical vs Grype
- Infisical vs Ory Kratos
- Infisical vs Legit Security
- Infisical vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Infisical vs Metasploit
- Infisical vs MetricStream
- Infisical vs Microsoft Defender
- Infisical vs Ory
- Infisical vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Infisical vs Euna Solutions
- Infisical vs Bidnet Direct
- Infisical vs OpenGov
- Infisical vs Bonfire
- Infisical vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Infisical vs NEOGOV
- Infisical vs ArchiveSocial
- Infisical vs Clariti
- Infisical vs GovPilot
- Infisical vs mySidewalk
- Infisical vs SAP for Government
- Infisical vs Axon Records
- Infisical vs CitizenLab
- Infisical vs ClearGov
- Infisical vs eCode360
- Infisical vs MyRec.com
- Infisical vs DemandStar
- Periscope Holdings vs Akeyless
- Periscope Holdings vs Doppler
- Periscope Holdings vs HashiCorp Vault
- Periscope Holdings vs Chainguard
- Periscope Holdings vs Authelia
- Periscope Holdings vs Bitwarden
- Periscope Holdings vs Delinea
- Periscope Holdings vs Semgrep
- Periscope Holdings vs Trivy
- Periscope Holdings vs Grype
- Periscope Holdings vs Ory Kratos
- Periscope Holdings vs Legit Security
- Periscope Holdings vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Periscope Holdings vs Metasploit
- Periscope Holdings vs MetricStream
- Periscope Holdings vs Microsoft Defender
- Periscope Holdings vs Ory
- Periscope Holdings vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Periscope Holdings vs Euna Solutions
- Periscope Holdings vs Bidnet Direct
- Periscope Holdings vs OpenGov
- Periscope Holdings vs Bonfire
- Periscope Holdings vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Periscope Holdings vs NEOGOV
- Periscope Holdings vs ArchiveSocial
- Periscope Holdings vs Clariti
- Periscope Holdings vs GovPilot
- Periscope Holdings vs mySidewalk
- Periscope Holdings vs SAP for Government
- Periscope Holdings vs Axon Records
- Periscope Holdings vs CitizenLab
- Periscope Holdings vs ClearGov
- Periscope Holdings vs eCode360
- Periscope Holdings vs MyRec.com
- Periscope Holdings vs DemandStar
