Government · head to head
Periscope Holdings vs Stytch

Periscope Holdings
Government
Statewide e-procurement systems and supplier networks for large public agencies
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Stytch
Cybersecurity
Identity platform with passwordless auth, passkeys and bot detection.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Stytch has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Periscope Holdings it is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.; Stytch free tier limited to 10,000 monthly active users; scaling beyond this requires custom pricing negotiation
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Periscope Holdings and Stytch actually diverge.
| Attribute | Periscope Holdings | Stytch |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Web, API |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Periscope Holdings
- Sealed bid solicitation
- Supplier registration network
- Contract catalogues
- Cooperative purchasing
- Spend and compliance reporting
- Supplier diversity tracking
Only in Stytch
Nothing recorded that Periscope Holdings does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Periscope Holdings
- A state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entitiesnot Stytch
- A large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening recordnot Stytch
- A purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entitiesnot Stytch
- A state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contractsnot Stytch
Stytch
- Applications prioritising passwordless and passkey authenticationnot Periscope Holdings
- SaaS platforms requiring AI agent authentication and machine-to-machine flowsnot Periscope Holdings
- Companies with emerging identity needs such as bot detection and device intelligencenot Periscope Holdings
- Organisations building with Next.js and React requiring modern auth patternsnot Periscope Holdings
- Applications needing transparent pricing without surprise tiers or feature gatingnot Periscope Holdings
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Periscope Holdings
- It is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- The interface reflects the age and regulatory weight of the platform, and suppliers routinely describe registration and bidding as harder than on newer portals, which can suppress bid response.
- Ownership has changed twice since 2021, from independent to mdf commerce to KKR, so roadmap and support continuity should be written into the contract rather than assumed.
- Sibling products inside mdf commerce cover adjacent procurement ground, which means an apparently competitive shortlist may contain two products with the same owner.
- Statewide implementations are multi year projects with heavy configuration and change management, and the professional services cost commonly exceeds the software over the contract term.
Stytch
- Free tier limited to 10,000 monthly active users; scaling beyond this requires custom pricing negotiation
- Fraud prevention capabilities billed at $0.005 per fingerprint for usage exceeding 10,000 free checks
- Additional SSO or SCIM connections beyond the 5 included in free tier cost $125 each
- Brand customisation and email removal require one-time payment of $99
- HIPAA and advanced fraud protection only available in Enterprise tier
- No native UI builder; requires custom frontend development for fully-branded auth flows
Pricing, plan by plan
Periscope Holdings
On request- BuySpeed$undefined/year
- Quoted per programme, scaled to entities served and transaction volume
- Multi year statewide contracts with implementation priced separately
- Supplier side registration fees form part of the commercial model on some programmes
Stytch
Free- FreeFree
- 10,000 monthly active users and AI agents
- Unlimited organisations
- 5 SSO or SCIM connections
- Scaled$undefined/variable
- Usage-based pricing for users exceeding 10,000
- All free tier features
- Volume discounts available
- Enterprise$undefined/variable
- Custom pricing
- Discounted volume rates
- Enterprise support SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Periscope Holdings if
- You need sealed bid solicitation.
- You also want supplier registration network.
Questions people ask
- Is Periscope Holdings or Stytch better?
- Neither clearly leads. Periscope Holdings starts at On request and Stytch at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Periscope Holdings or Stytch?
- Stytch has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Periscope Holdings and Free for Stytch.
- Does Periscope Holdings or Stytch run on more platforms?
- Periscope Holdings runs on Web. Stytch runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Stytch for free?
- Yes. Stytch has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Periscope Holdings starts at On request.
- What is Periscope Holdings best used for?
- Periscope Holdings is most often used for a state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entities, a large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening record, a purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entities, a state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contracts. Of those, a state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entities and a large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening record are not what Stytch is typically brought in for.
- What can Periscope Holdings do that Stytch cannot?
- Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation, Supplier registration network, Contract catalogues, Cooperative purchasing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Periscope Holdings: Who owns Periscope Holdings?
mdf commerce acquired it in 2021, and mdf commerce was itself acquired by KKR in 2024.
Stytch: What is included in Stytch's free tier?
The free tier includes 10,000 monthly active users (human and AI agents), unlimited organisations, 5 SSO or SCIM connections, and 1,000 machine-to-machine tokens with full authentication features.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Is it suitable for a single city?
Usually not. It is built and priced for statewide or very large agency programmes.
Stytch: Does Stytch support AI agent authentication?
Yes. Stytch provides native AI agent authentication and authorisation, with support for the Model Context Protocol (MCP) for authenticating AI agents accessing external systems.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: What is BuySpeed?
The e-procurement platform behind its statewide deployments, covering solicitation through catalogue ordering and reporting.
Stytch: What fraud prevention features does Stytch offer?
Stytch includes bot detection with 99.99% accuracy, device fingerprinting, invisible CAPTCHA, and zero-day device intelligence built into all tiers.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Can we see what a state paid?
Yes. State procurement awards are public records and typically disclose the full multi year contract value.
Related pages
More on Periscope Holdings
Other head to heads
- Periscope Holdings vs Euna Solutions
- Periscope Holdings vs Bidnet Direct
- Periscope Holdings vs OpenGov
- Periscope Holdings vs Bonfire
- Periscope Holdings vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Periscope Holdings vs NEOGOV
- Periscope Holdings vs ArchiveSocial
- Periscope Holdings vs Clariti
- Periscope Holdings vs GovPilot
- Periscope Holdings vs mySidewalk
- Periscope Holdings vs SAP for Government
- Periscope Holdings vs Axon Records
- Periscope Holdings vs CitizenLab
- Periscope Holdings vs ClearGov
- Periscope Holdings vs eCode360
- Periscope Holdings vs MyRec.com
- Periscope Holdings vs DemandStar
- Periscope Holdings vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Periscope Holdings vs 1Password
- Periscope Holdings vs Norton 360
- Periscope Holdings vs LastPass
- Periscope Holdings vs Cisco Duo
- Periscope Holdings vs Transmit Security
- Periscope Holdings vs Descope
- Periscope Holdings vs Authy
- Periscope Holdings vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Periscope Holdings vs VMware Carbon Black
- Periscope Holdings vs Feedzai
- Periscope Holdings vs NICE Actimize
- Periscope Holdings vs Salient CompleteView
- Periscope Holdings vs Sumsub
- Periscope Holdings vs Tuta
- Periscope Holdings vs Camio
- Periscope Holdings vs Clerk
- Stytch vs Euna Solutions
- Stytch vs Bidnet Direct
- Stytch vs OpenGov
- Stytch vs Bonfire
- Stytch vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Stytch vs NEOGOV
- Stytch vs ArchiveSocial
- Stytch vs Clariti
- Stytch vs GovPilot
- Stytch vs mySidewalk
- Stytch vs SAP for Government
- Stytch vs Axon Records
- Stytch vs CitizenLab
- Stytch vs ClearGov
- Stytch vs eCode360
- Stytch vs MyRec.com
- Stytch vs DemandStar
- Stytch vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Stytch vs 1Password
- Stytch vs Norton 360
- Stytch vs LastPass
- Stytch vs Cisco Duo
- Stytch vs Transmit Security
- Stytch vs Descope
- Stytch vs Authy
- Stytch vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Stytch vs VMware Carbon Black
- Stytch vs Feedzai
- Stytch vs NICE Actimize
- Stytch vs Salient CompleteView
- Stytch vs Sumsub
- Stytch vs Tuta
- Stytch vs Camio
- Stytch vs Clerk
