Cybersecurity · head to head
Descope vs Periscope Holdings

Descope
Cybersecurity
No-code drag-and-drop authentication platform.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Periscope Holdings
Government
Statewide e-procurement systems and supplier networks for large public agencies
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Descope has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Descope free tier capped at 7,500 MAU; Pro tier at 10,000 MAU, Growth tier at 25,000 MAU, forcing migration to Enterprise for larger organisations; Periscope Holdings it is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Descope and Periscope Holdings actually diverge.
| Attribute | Descope | Periscope Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, API | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Descope
Nothing recorded that Periscope Holdings does not also cover.
Only in Periscope Holdings
- Sealed bid solicitation
- Supplier registration network
- Contract catalogues
- Cooperative purchasing
- Spend and compliance reporting
- Supplier diversity tracking
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Descope
- Organisations seeking rapid identity implementation without custom developmentnot Periscope Holdings
- Companies supporting multiple user types (consumers, partners, AI agents) in single platformnot Periscope Holdings
- Multi-tenant B2B2C SaaS applications requiring per-organisation identity policiesnot Periscope Holdings
- Teams building passwordless-first authentication experiencesnot Periscope Holdings
- Healthcare and regulated industries requiring HIPAA-compliant identity managementnot Periscope Holdings
Periscope Holdings
- A state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entitiesnot Descope
- A large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening recordnot Descope
- A purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entitiesnot Descope
- A state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contractsnot Descope
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Descope
- Free tier capped at 7,500 MAU; Pro tier at 10,000 MAU, Growth tier at 25,000 MAU, forcing migration to Enterprise for larger organisations
- HIPAA compliance only available in Growth tier ($799/mo) and above; not included in lower-priced plans
- No-code UI builder provides pre-built flows but still requires custom frontend development for fully-branded authentication experiences
- All paid tiers billed annually; no monthly billing option for commitment-free flexibility
- Bot protection features available only in Growth tier and above
Periscope Holdings
- It is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- The interface reflects the age and regulatory weight of the platform, and suppliers routinely describe registration and bidding as harder than on newer portals, which can suppress bid response.
- Ownership has changed twice since 2021, from independent to mdf commerce to KKR, so roadmap and support continuity should be written into the contract rather than assumed.
- Sibling products inside mdf commerce cover adjacent procurement ground, which means an apparently competitive shortlist may contain two products with the same owner.
- Statewide implementations are multi year projects with heavy configuration and change management, and the professional services cost commonly exceeds the software over the contract term.
Pricing, plan by plan
Descope
Free- Free ForeverFree
- 7,500 monthly active users
- Basic authentication
- Community support
- Pro$249/month
- 10,000 monthly active users
- Custom domains
- CI/CD integration
- Growth$799/month
- 25,000 monthly active users
- Bot protection
- Fine-grained authorisation
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited monthly active users
- Tiered discounts
- Premium support with dedicated CS engineer
Periscope Holdings
On request- BuySpeed$undefined/year
- Quoted per programme, scaled to entities served and transaction volume
- Multi year statewide contracts with implementation priced separately
- Supplier side registration fees form part of the commercial model on some programmes
Which should you pick?
Choose Periscope Holdings if
- You need sealed bid solicitation.
- You also want supplier registration network.
Questions people ask
- Is Descope or Periscope Holdings better?
- Neither clearly leads. Descope starts at Free and Periscope Holdings at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Descope or Periscope Holdings?
- Descope has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Descope and On request for Periscope Holdings.
- Does Descope or Periscope Holdings run on more platforms?
- Descope runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Periscope Holdings runs on Web.
- Can I use Descope for free?
- Yes. Descope has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Periscope Holdings starts at On request.
- What is Descope best used for?
- Descope is most often used for organisations seeking rapid identity implementation without custom development, companies supporting multiple user types (consumers, partners, ai agents) in single platform, multi-tenant b2b2c saas applications requiring per-organisation identity policies, teams building passwordless-first authentication experiences. Of those, organisations seeking rapid identity implementation without custom development and companies supporting multiple user types (consumers, partners, ai agents) in single platform are not what Periscope Holdings is typically brought in for.
- What can Descope do that Periscope Holdings cannot?
- Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation, Supplier registration network, Contract catalogues, Cooperative purchasing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Descope: Can I build custom authentication flows without code?
Yes. Descope's drag-and-drop workflow interface allows you to construct and modify signup, login, MFA and SSO flows without code changes.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Who owns Periscope Holdings?
mdf commerce acquired it in 2021, and mdf commerce was itself acquired by KKR in 2024.
Descope: Does Descope support AI agent authentication?
Yes. Descope supports building identity journeys for AI agents and MCP servers, including scoped OAuth tokens and delegation chains.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Is it suitable for a single city?
Usually not. It is built and priced for statewide or very large agency programmes.
Descope: Is Descope HIPAA compliant?
HIPAA compliance is available in Growth tier and above, starting at $799/month.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: What is BuySpeed?
The e-procurement platform behind its statewide deployments, covering solicitation through catalogue ordering and reporting.
Periscope Holdings: Can we see what a state paid?
Yes. State procurement awards are public records and typically disclose the full multi year contract value.
Related pages
More on Periscope Holdings
Other head to heads
- Descope vs Transmit Security
- Descope vs 1Password
- Descope vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Descope vs Norton 360
- Descope vs LastPass
- Descope vs Cisco Duo
- Descope vs Akeyless
- Descope vs Endor Labs
- Descope vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Descope vs Stytch
- Descope vs Clerk
- Descope vs Private Internet Access
- Descope vs Arnica
- Descope vs Authelia
- Descope vs Authy
- Descope vs Baffle
- Descope vs Beyond Identity
- Descope vs BeyondTrust
- Descope vs Euna Solutions
- Descope vs Bidnet Direct
- Descope vs OpenGov
- Descope vs Bonfire
- Descope vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Descope vs NEOGOV
- Descope vs ArchiveSocial
- Descope vs Clariti
- Descope vs GovPilot
- Descope vs mySidewalk
- Descope vs SAP for Government
- Descope vs Axon Records
- Descope vs CitizenLab
- Descope vs ClearGov
- Descope vs eCode360
- Descope vs MyRec.com
- Descope vs DemandStar
- Periscope Holdings vs Transmit Security
- Periscope Holdings vs 1Password
- Periscope Holdings vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Periscope Holdings vs Norton 360
- Periscope Holdings vs LastPass
- Periscope Holdings vs Cisco Duo
- Periscope Holdings vs Akeyless
- Periscope Holdings vs Endor Labs
- Periscope Holdings vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Periscope Holdings vs Stytch
- Periscope Holdings vs Clerk
- Periscope Holdings vs Private Internet Access
- Periscope Holdings vs Arnica
- Periscope Holdings vs Authelia
- Periscope Holdings vs Authy
- Periscope Holdings vs Baffle
- Periscope Holdings vs Beyond Identity
- Periscope Holdings vs BeyondTrust
- Periscope Holdings vs Euna Solutions
- Periscope Holdings vs Bidnet Direct
- Periscope Holdings vs OpenGov
- Periscope Holdings vs Bonfire
- Periscope Holdings vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Periscope Holdings vs NEOGOV
- Periscope Holdings vs ArchiveSocial
- Periscope Holdings vs Clariti
- Periscope Holdings vs GovPilot
- Periscope Holdings vs mySidewalk
- Periscope Holdings vs SAP for Government
- Periscope Holdings vs Axon Records
- Periscope Holdings vs CitizenLab
- Periscope Holdings vs ClearGov
- Periscope Holdings vs eCode360
- Periscope Holdings vs MyRec.com
- Periscope Holdings vs DemandStar
