No-Code · head to head
OutSystems vs Workato

OutSystems
No-Code
Enterprise low-code platform priced by application complexity units, not just users
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Workato
Automation Integration
The enterprise integration platform
- From
- $99/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OutSystems application Objects grow with every screen, table and API an app gains, so a successful app that keeps adding features can push the account into AO overage charges that were not modelled at initial budget time.; Workato the pricing page names four product lines, Enterprise iPaaS, Agentic solutions, API Management and Data Orchestration, and publishes no figure for any of them, gating all of it behind Schedule a demo
- They diverge on capability: OutSystems covers Visual application modelling, Workato covers Process orchestration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OutSystems and Workato actually diverge.
| Attribute | OutSystems | Workato |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $99/month |
| Pricing model | Application Object consumption plus internal and external user packs | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, On-premise |
| Category | No-Code | Automation Integration |
| Founded | Unknown | 2014 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OutSystems
- Visual application modelling
- Generated deployable code
- One-click deployment
- AI-assisted development
- Application Object governance
- Prebuilt integrations
Only in Workato
- Process orchestration
- Master data management
- Integration templates
- Real-time sync
- Error handling
- Monitoring
- API management
- Workflow analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OutSystems
- An enterprise replacing custom .NET or Java application development with a governed low-code platform at scalenot Workato
- A company building customer-facing portals where the external-user pricing tier (packs of 10,000) is materially cheaper than licensing customers as internal usersnot Workato
- An IT department that wants generated, inspectable code rather than a proprietary black-box runtimenot Workato
- An organisation with a large existing application portfolio needing centralised governance across many apps built by different teamsnot Workato
Workato
- Workflow Automationnot OutSystems
- Data Integrationnot OutSystems
- Process Automationnot OutSystems
- App Integrationnot OutSystems
- API Connectivitynot OutSystems
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OutSystems
- Application Objects grow with every screen, table and API an app gains, so a successful app that keeps adding features can push the account into AO overage charges that were not modelled at initial budget time.
- Internal users are sold in packs of 100 and external users in packs of 10,000, so a company just over a pack boundary in either category pays for a full additional pack rather than a handful of extra seats.
- Entry-level ODC pricing starts around 36,300 US dollars a year before any AO overage or extra user packs, which puts it out of reach for smaller teams evaluating low-code options.
- Cloud infrastructure and hosting costs are frequently separate from the platform licence, so the all-in bill is higher than the headline subscription figure suggests.
- Migrating a large application portfolio off OutSystems once built is difficult, since the generated code and platform-specific patterns are not designed for a clean export to standard frameworks.
Workato
- The pricing page names four product lines, Enterprise iPaaS, Agentic solutions, API Management and Data Orchestration, and publishes no figure for any of them, gating all of it behind Schedule a demo
Pricing, plan by plan
OutSystems
On request- ODC Entry$undefined/year
- Entry-level Application Object allowance included
- Internal users sold in packs of 100
- External users sold in packs of 10,000
- ODC Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom AO, user pack and environment volumes
- Negotiated multi-year enterprise agreements
- Premium support and dedicated infrastructure options
Workato
$99/month- Starter$99/month
- Up to 50 recipes
- Basic integrations
- Email support
- Professional$299/month
- Unlimited recipes
- Premium integrations
- Priority support
- Enterprise$999/month
- Custom SLA
- Dedicated support
- Advanced security
Which should you pick?
Choose OutSystems if
- You need visual application modelling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want generated deployable code.
Choose Workato if
- You need process orchestration.
- You work on Web, On-premise.
- You also want master data management.
Questions people ask
- Is OutSystems or Workato better?
- Neither clearly leads. OutSystems starts at On request and Workato at $99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OutSystems or Workato?
- OutSystems starts at On request and Workato at $99/month.
- Does OutSystems or Workato run on more platforms?
- OutSystems runs on Web, iOS, Android. Workato runs on Web, On-premise.
- What is OutSystems best used for?
- OutSystems is most often used for an enterprise replacing custom .net or java application development with a governed low-code platform at scale, a company building customer-facing portals where the external-user pricing tier (packs of 10,000) is materially cheaper than licensing customers as internal users, an it department that wants generated, inspectable code rather than a proprietary black-box runtime, an organisation with a large existing application portfolio needing centralised governance across many apps built by different teams. Of those, an enterprise replacing custom .net or java application development with a governed low-code platform at scale and a company building customer-facing portals where the external-user pricing tier (packs of 10,000) is materially cheaper than licensing customers as internal users are not what Workato is typically brought in for.
- What can OutSystems do that Workato cannot?
- OutSystems covers Visual application modelling, Generated deployable code, One-click deployment, AI-assisted development. Workato covers Process orchestration, Master data management, Integration templates, Real-time sync.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OutSystems: What is an Application Object?
A unit OutSystems uses to measure application complexity, counting elements such as screens, database tables and exposed APIs; more AOs mean a bigger licence requirement.
Workato: How is Workato pricing structured?
Workato states their pricing is built for flexibility and designed to support organizations of all sizes and needs. However, specific tier costs, feature inclusions, and contract terms are not published on their website.
SourceOutSystems: Is there a free tier?
OutSystems has offered free or trial tiers historically for evaluation, but production use at any scale runs on paid ODC plans.
Workato: Can I see Workato's pricing without talking to sales?
No. Workato requires interested buyers to either request a demo, request a trial, or contact their sales team directly to discuss pricing.
SourceOutSystems: How does external user pricing work?
External users, typically customers or partners, are sold in packs of 10,000 at roughly a hundredth of the per-seat cost of internal (employee) user packs.
Workato: Does Workato have a Predictable Pricing Commitment?
Yes, Workato mentions a Predictable Pricing Commitment, but the details are not visible on the main pricing page. You would need to contact them or visit the linked resource for details.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- OutSystems vs Mendix
- OutSystems vs FlutterFlow
- OutSystems vs Appian
- OutSystems vs Superblocks
- OutSystems vs Caspio
- OutSystems vs Zoho Creator
- OutSystems vs Thunkable
- OutSystems vs Momen
- OutSystems vs Adalo
- OutSystems vs Bubble
- OutSystems vs Quickbase
- OutSystems vs ToolJet
- OutSystems vs Directual
- OutSystems vs Draftbit
- OutSystems vs Pabbly Connect
- OutSystems vs Stacker
- OutSystems vs Microsoft Power Automate
- OutSystems vs Zapier
- OutSystems vs MuleSoft
- OutSystems vs n8n
- OutSystems vs Autonoly
- OutSystems vs Alloy Automation
- OutSystems vs Cyclr
- OutSystems vs Celigo
- OutSystems vs Boomi
- OutSystems vs Tray.io
- OutSystems vs UiPath
- OutSystems vs Jitterbit
- OutSystems vs HighLevel
- OutSystems vs Grouparoo
- OutSystems vs Hatchet
- OutSystems vs Hevo Data
- OutSystems vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- OutSystems vs IBM MQ
- Workato vs Mendix
- Workato vs FlutterFlow
- Workato vs Appian
- Workato vs Superblocks
- Workato vs Caspio
- Workato vs Zoho Creator
- Workato vs Thunkable
- Workato vs Momen
- Workato vs Adalo
- Workato vs Bubble
- Workato vs Quickbase
- Workato vs ToolJet
- Workato vs Directual
- Workato vs Draftbit
- Workato vs Pabbly Connect
- Workato vs Stacker
- Workato vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Workato vs Zapier
- Workato vs MuleSoft
- Workato vs n8n
- Workato vs Autonoly
- Workato vs Alloy Automation
- Workato vs Cyclr
- Workato vs Celigo
- Workato vs Boomi
- Workato vs Tray.io
- Workato vs UiPath
- Workato vs Jitterbit
- Workato vs HighLevel
- Workato vs Grouparoo
- Workato vs Hatchet
- Workato vs Hevo Data
- Workato vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Workato vs IBM MQ
