No-Code · head to head
OutSystems vs Tray.io

OutSystems
No-Code
Enterprise low-code platform priced by application complexity units, not just users
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Tray.io has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OutSystems application Objects grow with every screen, table and API an app gains, so a successful app that keeps adding features can push the account into AO overage charges that were not modelled at initial budget time.; Tray.io now rebranded Tray.ai; pricing page names three tiers, Pro (3 workspaces, 7 day insights), Team (20 workspaces, 30 day insights) and Enterprise (unlimited workspaces, 180 day insights, SSO, HIPAA), but publishes no figures and requires a demo or sales call for a quote
- They diverge on capability: OutSystems covers Visual application modelling, Tray.io covers Low-code workflow builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OutSystems and Tray.io actually diverge.
| Attribute | OutSystems | Tray.io |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Application Object consumption plus internal and external user packs | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Api |
| Category | No-Code | Automation Integration |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OutSystems
- Visual application modelling
- Generated deployable code
- One-click deployment
- AI-assisted development
- Application Object governance
- Prebuilt integrations
Only in Tray.io
- Low-code workflow builder
- API integrations
- Webhooks
- Conditional logic
- Error handling
- Rate limiting
- Data transformation
- Authentication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OutSystems
- An enterprise replacing custom .NET or Java application development with a governed low-code platform at scalenot Tray.io
- A company building customer-facing portals where the external-user pricing tier (packs of 10,000) is materially cheaper than licensing customers as internal usersnot Tray.io
- An IT department that wants generated, inspectable code rather than a proprietary black-box runtimenot Tray.io
- An organisation with a large existing application portfolio needing centralised governance across many apps built by different teamsnot Tray.io
Tray.io
- Workflow Automationnot OutSystems
- Data Integrationnot OutSystems
- Process Automationnot OutSystems
- App Integrationnot OutSystems
- API Connectivitynot OutSystems
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OutSystems
- Application Objects grow with every screen, table and API an app gains, so a successful app that keeps adding features can push the account into AO overage charges that were not modelled at initial budget time.
- Internal users are sold in packs of 100 and external users in packs of 10,000, so a company just over a pack boundary in either category pays for a full additional pack rather than a handful of extra seats.
- Entry-level ODC pricing starts around 36,300 US dollars a year before any AO overage or extra user packs, which puts it out of reach for smaller teams evaluating low-code options.
- Cloud infrastructure and hosting costs are frequently separate from the platform licence, so the all-in bill is higher than the headline subscription figure suggests.
- Migrating a large application portfolio off OutSystems once built is difficult, since the generated code and platform-specific patterns are not designed for a clean export to standard frameworks.
Tray.io
- Now rebranded Tray.ai; pricing page names three tiers, Pro (3 workspaces, 7 day insights), Team (20 workspaces, 30 day insights) and Enterprise (unlimited workspaces, 180 day insights, SSO, HIPAA), but publishes no figures and requires a demo or sales call for a quote
Pricing, plan by plan
OutSystems
On request- ODC Entry$undefined/year
- Entry-level Application Object allowance included
- Internal users sold in packs of 100
- External users sold in packs of 10,000
- ODC Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom AO, user pack and environment volumes
- Negotiated multi-year enterprise agreements
- Premium support and dedicated infrastructure options
Tray.io
Free- Starter$50/month
- 20 workflows
- 50 integrations
- Community support
- Professional$150/month
- Unlimited workflows
- 500+ integrations
- Email support
- Enterprise$500/month
- Custom workflows
- Dedicated support
- Advanced security
Which should you pick?
Choose OutSystems if
- You need visual application modelling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want generated deployable code.
Choose Tray.io if
- You need low-code workflow builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want api integrations.
Questions people ask
- Is OutSystems or Tray.io better?
- Neither clearly leads. OutSystems starts at On request and Tray.io at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OutSystems or Tray.io?
- Tray.io has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for OutSystems and Free for Tray.io.
- Does OutSystems or Tray.io run on more platforms?
- OutSystems runs on Web, iOS, Android. Tray.io runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Tray.io for free?
- Yes. Tray.io has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. OutSystems starts at On request.
- What is OutSystems best used for?
- OutSystems is most often used for an enterprise replacing custom .net or java application development with a governed low-code platform at scale, a company building customer-facing portals where the external-user pricing tier (packs of 10,000) is materially cheaper than licensing customers as internal users, an it department that wants generated, inspectable code rather than a proprietary black-box runtime, an organisation with a large existing application portfolio needing centralised governance across many apps built by different teams. Of those, an enterprise replacing custom .net or java application development with a governed low-code platform at scale and a company building customer-facing portals where the external-user pricing tier (packs of 10,000) is materially cheaper than licensing customers as internal users are not what Tray.io is typically brought in for.
- What can OutSystems do that Tray.io cannot?
- OutSystems covers Visual application modelling, Generated deployable code, One-click deployment, AI-assisted development. Tray.io covers Low-code workflow builder, API integrations, Webhooks, Conditional logic.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OutSystems: What is an Application Object?
A unit OutSystems uses to measure application complexity, counting elements such as screens, database tables and exposed APIs; more AOs mean a bigger licence requirement.
OutSystems: Is there a free tier?
OutSystems has offered free or trial tiers historically for evaluation, but production use at any scale runs on paid ODC plans.
OutSystems: How does external user pricing work?
External users, typically customers or partners, are sold in packs of 10,000 at roughly a hundredth of the per-seat cost of internal (employee) user packs.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OutSystems vs Mendix
- OutSystems vs FlutterFlow
- OutSystems vs Appian
- OutSystems vs Superblocks
- OutSystems vs Caspio
- OutSystems vs Zoho Creator
- OutSystems vs Thunkable
- OutSystems vs Momen
- OutSystems vs Adalo
- OutSystems vs Bubble
- OutSystems vs Quickbase
- OutSystems vs ToolJet
- OutSystems vs Directual
- OutSystems vs Draftbit
- OutSystems vs Pabbly Connect
- OutSystems vs Stacker
- OutSystems vs Microsoft Power Automate
- OutSystems vs Zapier
- OutSystems vs n8n
- OutSystems vs MuleSoft
- OutSystems vs Cyclr
- OutSystems vs Celigo
- OutSystems vs Boomi
- OutSystems vs Workato
- OutSystems vs Automation Anywhere
- OutSystems vs Paragon
- OutSystems vs Blue Prism
- OutSystems vs Nintex
- OutSystems vs Hightouch
- OutSystems vs Jitterbit
- OutSystems vs Nango
- OutSystems vs Pipedream
- OutSystems vs Windmill
- Tray.io vs Mendix
- Tray.io vs FlutterFlow
- Tray.io vs Appian
- Tray.io vs Superblocks
- Tray.io vs Caspio
- Tray.io vs Zoho Creator
- Tray.io vs Thunkable
- Tray.io vs Momen
- Tray.io vs Adalo
- Tray.io vs Bubble
- Tray.io vs Quickbase
- Tray.io vs ToolJet
- Tray.io vs Directual
- Tray.io vs Draftbit
- Tray.io vs Pabbly Connect
- Tray.io vs Stacker
- Tray.io vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Tray.io vs Zapier
- Tray.io vs n8n
- Tray.io vs MuleSoft
- Tray.io vs Cyclr
- Tray.io vs Celigo
- Tray.io vs Boomi
- Tray.io vs Workato
- Tray.io vs Automation Anywhere
- Tray.io vs Paragon
- Tray.io vs Blue Prism
- Tray.io vs Nintex
- Tray.io vs Hightouch
- Tray.io vs Jitterbit
- Tray.io vs Nango
- Tray.io vs Pipedream
- Tray.io vs Windmill

