Cybersecurity · head to head
Osano vs Privacy Badger

Osano
Cybersecurity
Consent management and data privacy platform with a published self-serve tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Privacy Badger
Browser Extensions
Automatically learn to block invisible trackers
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Osano the published visitor ceilings are low, with the paid self-serve tier stopping around 30,000 monthly visitors, so any consumer facing site with real traffic leaves published pricing immediately and negotiates a quote with no public anchor.; Privacy Badger it is not an ad blocker; the project states its aim is to prevent non-consensual tracking rather than to block ads
- They diverge on capability: Osano covers Consent banner, Privacy Badger covers Automatic tracker detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Osano and Privacy Badger actually diverge.
| Attribute | Osano | Privacy Badger |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per month by monthly website visitors | free |
| Platforms | Web | Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Opera |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Browser Extensions |
| Founded | Unknown | 1990 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Osano
- Consent banner
- Pre-consent tag blocking
- Consent record
- No fines guarantee
- Subject rights requests
- Data mapping
- Vendor privacy monitoring
- Cookie scanning
Only in Privacy Badger
- Automatic tracker detection
- Learning algorithm
- Do Not Track support
- No filter lists required
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
- Opera support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Osano
- A mid market company selling into the EU and California that needs one banner honouring different consent rules by visitor regionnot Privacy Badger
- A privacy counsel who wants a vendor that will contractually stand behind its consent product rather than disclaim all liabilitynot Privacy Badger
- A marketing team that needs Google Consent Mode signals wired correctly so analytics and ads degrade rather than break when consent is refusednot Privacy Badger
- A company with a handful of brand domains wanting one consent record and one scanning schedule across all of themnot Privacy Badger
Privacy Badger
- Blocking third-party trackers that follow users across websitesnot Osano
- Sending Do Not Track and Global Privacy Control signalsnot Osano
- Disabling social media tracking widgets like Facebook Like buttonsnot Osano
- Preventing canvas fingerprinting across websitesnot Osano
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Osano
- The published visitor ceilings are low, with the paid self-serve tier stopping around 30,000 monthly visitors, so any consumer facing site with real traffic leaves published pricing immediately and negotiates a quote with no public anchor.
- The no fines guarantee is bounded and conditional on configuring the product as instructed, so it is a marketing differentiator with an indemnity cap rather than the insurance policy the name suggests, and the limits should be read before it influences a decision.
- Everything beyond consent, including subject rights automation, data mapping and vendor monitoring, is enterprise quoted, so the transparent pricing that attracts buyers covers only the cheapest part of the platform.
- Tag blocking depends on tags being loaded through the mechanisms Osano can intercept, and marketing teams that inject scripts directly into templates or through server side tagging routinely leak trackers past the banner without anyone noticing.
- It is a privacy platform rather than a security compliance one, so organisations that also need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence collection run it alongside a separate tool and duplicate parts of the vendor and asset inventory.
Privacy Badger
- It is not an ad blocker; the project states its aim is to prevent non-consensual tracking rather than to block ads
- There is no Safari build, and Safari on iOS lacks extension capabilities Privacy Badger needs to work
- Chrome on Android does not support extensions, so Android users have to switch to Firefox or Edge
- Protection is aimed at third-party trackers and does not comprehensively cover tracking by the site you are actually visiting
Pricing, plan by plan
Osano
Free- FreeFree
- 1 user
- 1 domain
- 5,000 monthly visitors
- Plus$199/month
- 2 users
- 3 domains
- 30,000 monthly visitors
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited domains and higher visitor volumes
- Subject rights request automation
- Data mapping and assessments
Privacy Badger
Free- FreeFree
- Automatic tracker learning
- Third-party blocking
- Do Not Track
Which should you pick?
Choose Osano if
- You need consent banner.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want pre-consent tag blocking.
Choose Privacy Badger if
- You need automatic tracker detection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Opera.
- You also want learning algorithm.
Questions people ask
- Is Osano or Privacy Badger better?
- Neither clearly leads. Osano starts at Free and Privacy Badger at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Osano or Privacy Badger?
- Osano starts at Free and Privacy Badger at Free.
- Does Osano or Privacy Badger run on more platforms?
- Osano runs on Web. Privacy Badger runs on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Opera.
- Can I use Osano for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Osano best used for?
- Osano is most often used for a mid market company selling into the eu and california that needs one banner honouring different consent rules by visitor region, a privacy counsel who wants a vendor that will contractually stand behind its consent product rather than disclaim all liability, a marketing team that needs google consent mode signals wired correctly so analytics and ads degrade rather than break when consent is refused, a company with a handful of brand domains wanting one consent record and one scanning schedule across all of them. Of those, a mid market company selling into the eu and california that needs one banner honouring different consent rules by visitor region and a privacy counsel who wants a vendor that will contractually stand behind its consent product rather than disclaim all liability are not what Privacy Badger is typically brought in for.
- What can Osano do that Privacy Badger cannot?
- Osano covers Consent banner, Pre-consent tag blocking, Consent record, No fines guarantee. Privacy Badger covers Automatic tracker detection, Learning algorithm, Do Not Track support, No filter lists required.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Osano: Does the free tier include the no fines guarantee?
No. The guarantee attaches to paid use of the consent product, and the free tier is capped at one domain and 5,000 monthly visitors.
Privacy Badger: How much does Privacy Badger cost?
Privacy Badger is free browser extension made by the Electronic Frontier Foundation. There are no pricing tiers or subscription costs. The project accepts donations to support EFF's work.
SourceOsano: How is Osano priced?
By monthly website visitors, number of domains and tier. The self-serve path stops at a low visitor ceiling and everything above is quoted.
Osano: Can it handle US state privacy laws as well as GDPR?
Yes, with region aware rule sets covering GDPR, ePrivacy and the US state regimes, so an EU visitor sees an opt-in banner and a US visitor sees the applicable opt-out.
Osano: Does Osano do subject access requests?
Yes, but in the enterprise tier rather than the published plans, and it is quoted separately from consent.
Related pages
More on Privacy Badger
Other head to heads
- Osano vs TrustArc
- Osano vs Transcend
- Osano vs Termly
- Osano vs OneTrust
- Osano vs DataGrail
- Osano vs Avast One
- Osano vs CyberGhost VPN
- Osano vs ProtonVPN
- Osano vs Securiti
- Osano vs Surfshark
- Osano vs BigID
- Osano vs Mullvad VPN
- Osano vs Speakeasy
- Osano vs Sysdig
- Osano vs Tenable
- Osano vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Osano vs TunnelBear
- Osano vs Vanta
- Osano vs Ghostery
- Osano vs AdBlock Plus
- Osano vs uBlock Origin
- Osano vs Night Eye
- Osano vs GoFullPage
- Osano vs Pocket
- Osano vs Dark Reader
- Osano vs Raindrop.io
- Osano vs Instapaper
- Osano vs Awesome Screenshot
- Osano vs BuiltWith
- Osano vs LanguageTool
- Osano vs JSON Viewer
- Osano vs Nimbus Screenshot
- Osano vs Redux DevTools
- Osano vs Stylus
- Osano vs Violentmonkey
- Privacy Badger vs TrustArc
- Privacy Badger vs Transcend
- Privacy Badger vs Termly
- Privacy Badger vs OneTrust
- Privacy Badger vs DataGrail
- Privacy Badger vs Avast One
- Privacy Badger vs CyberGhost VPN
- Privacy Badger vs ProtonVPN
- Privacy Badger vs Securiti
- Privacy Badger vs Surfshark
- Privacy Badger vs BigID
- Privacy Badger vs Mullvad VPN
- Privacy Badger vs Speakeasy
- Privacy Badger vs Sysdig
- Privacy Badger vs Tenable
- Privacy Badger vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Privacy Badger vs TunnelBear
- Privacy Badger vs Vanta
- Privacy Badger vs Ghostery
- Privacy Badger vs AdBlock Plus
- Privacy Badger vs uBlock Origin
- Privacy Badger vs Night Eye
- Privacy Badger vs GoFullPage
- Privacy Badger vs Pocket
- Privacy Badger vs Dark Reader
- Privacy Badger vs Raindrop.io
- Privacy Badger vs Instapaper
- Privacy Badger vs Awesome Screenshot
- Privacy Badger vs BuiltWith
- Privacy Badger vs LanguageTool
- Privacy Badger vs JSON Viewer
- Privacy Badger vs Nimbus Screenshot
- Privacy Badger vs Redux DevTools
- Privacy Badger vs Stylus
- Privacy Badger vs Violentmonkey
