Cybersecurity · head to head
Ory Kratos vs Refact

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Ory Kratos headless means you build every screen, which is significant work compared with a hosted login page; Refact requires configuration for optimal performance
- They diverge on capability: Ory Kratos covers Headless API, Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ory Kratos and Refact actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ory Kratos | Refact |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open-source self-hosted, with a paid managed network | Freemium with paid tiers |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | VS Code, Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 2023 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ory Kratos
- Headless API
- Self-service flows
- Multi-factor authentication
- Pluggable identity schemas
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- On-premise deployment
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ory Kratos
- Products needing complete control over the look and flow of authenticationnot Refact
- Applications that must not hand user identity data to a third partynot Refact
- Teams building identity as infrastructure across several servicesnot Refact
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot Ory Kratos
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot Ory Kratos
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot Ory Kratos
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot Ory Kratos
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ory Kratos
- Headless means you build every screen, which is significant work compared with a hosted login page
- More moving parts than a monolithic IAM: Kratos handles identity, and OAuth2 needs Ory Hydra alongside
- Documentation assumes real familiarity with identity concepts and is not a gentle introduction
- Self-hosting identity carries the security and availability burden that hosted providers absorb
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Pricing, plan by plan
Ory Kratos
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Full identity server
- All flows
- Community support
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Which should you pick?
Choose Ory Kratos if
- You need headless api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want self-service flows.
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Questions people ask
- Is Ory Kratos or Refact better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ory Kratos starts at Free and Refact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ory Kratos or Refact?
- Ory Kratos starts at Free and Refact at Free.
- Does Ory Kratos or Refact run on more platforms?
- Ory Kratos runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Refact runs on VS Code, Web.
- Can I use Ory Kratos for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Ory Kratos best used for?
- Ory Kratos is most often used for products needing complete control over the look and flow of authentication, applications that must not hand user identity data to a third party, teams building identity as infrastructure across several services. Of those, products needing complete control over the look and flow of authentication and applications that must not hand user identity data to a third party are not what Refact is typically brought in for.
- What can Ory Kratos do that Refact cannot?
- Ory Kratos covers Headless API, Self-service flows, Multi-factor authentication, Pluggable identity schemas. Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ory Kratos: Is Ory Kratos free?
Yes, open source and free to self-host. Ory Network is a paid managed service.
Refact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourceOry Kratos: What does headless mean here?
Kratos provides identity flows as APIs and no user interface. You build the login, registration and recovery screens yourself.
Refact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourceOry Kratos: Does Kratos do OAuth2?
No. Kratos handles user identity; OAuth2 and OpenID Connect provider functionality is Ory Hydra, a separate component.
Refact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Ory Kratos vs Logto
- Ory Kratos vs Authelia
- Ory Kratos vs 1Password
- Ory Kratos vs authentik
- Ory Kratos vs Clerk
- Ory Kratos vs Trivy
- Ory Kratos vs LastPass
- Ory Kratos vs HashiCorp Vault
- Ory Kratos vs Bitwarden
- Ory Kratos vs Frontegg
- Ory Kratos vs Infisical
- Ory Kratos vs Semgrep
- Ory Kratos vs Envysion
- Ory Kratos vs Feedzai
- Ory Kratos vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Ory Kratos vs JumpCloud
- Ory Kratos vs GitHub Copilot
- Ory Kratos vs Swagger UI
- Ory Kratos vs Sweep
- Ory Kratos vs Coder
- Ory Kratos vs Pieces for Developers
- Ory Kratos vs CodeSandbox
- Ory Kratos vs GNU Emacs
- Ory Kratos vs Moonrepo
- Ory Kratos vs Pants Build
- Ory Kratos vs Atlantis
- Ory Kratos vs Backstage
- Ory Kratos vs Visual Studio Code
- Ory Kratos vs Garden
- Ory Kratos vs GitLab CI/CD
- Ory Kratos vs HCP Terraform
- Ory Kratos vs Helm
- Ory Kratos vs Jitsu
- Ory Kratos vs Notepad++
- Refact vs Logto
- Refact vs Authelia
- Refact vs 1Password
- Refact vs authentik
- Refact vs Clerk
- Refact vs Trivy
- Refact vs LastPass
- Refact vs HashiCorp Vault
- Refact vs Bitwarden
- Refact vs Frontegg
- Refact vs Infisical
- Refact vs Semgrep
- Refact vs Envysion
- Refact vs Feedzai
- Refact vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Refact vs JumpCloud
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Swagger UI
- Refact vs Sweep
- Refact vs Coder
- Refact vs Pieces for Developers
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Pants Build
- Refact vs Atlantis
- Refact vs Backstage
- Refact vs Visual Studio Code
- Refact vs Garden
- Refact vs GitLab CI/CD
- Refact vs HCP Terraform
- Refact vs Helm
- Refact vs Jitsu
- Refact vs Notepad++

