Cloud · head to head
Orca Security vs WarpBuild

Orca Security
Cloud
Agentless cloud-native application protection platform for code-to-runtime security.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

WarpBuild
Developer Tools
2x faster, 50% cheaper GitHub Actions runners
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Orca Security no public pricing; requires a demo and custom quote from sales.; WarpBuild per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs
- They diverge on capability: Orca Security covers Agentless cloud scanning, WarpBuild covers Optimized runner infrastructure.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Orca Security and WarpBuild actually diverge.
| Attribute | Orca Security | WarpBuild |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | Usage-based per minute, varies by runner configuration |
| Platforms | web, api | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud |
| Category | Cloud | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Orca Security
- Agentless cloud scanning
- Attack path analysis
- Shadow AI detection
- Secure code development
- Alert prioritization
- Workload protection
Only in WarpBuild
- Optimized runner infrastructure
- Intelligent caching
- Incremental builds
- Multi-architecture support
- Unlimited concurrency
- Autoscaling
- BYOC support
- Docker builders
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Orca Security
- Gaining full cloud asset visibility without deploying agentsnot WarpBuild
- Prioritizing cloud risk with attack path correlationnot WarpBuild
- Detecting shadow AI usage across cloud environmentsnot WarpBuild
- Scanning code, containers, and IaC before deploymentnot WarpBuild
- Reducing alert fatigue through contextual risk scoringnot WarpBuild
WarpBuild
- Accelerating CI builds for teams with high test volumesnot Orca Security
- Running tests generated by AI coding assistants efficientlynot Orca Security
- Reducing GitHub Actions costs by 50% or morenot Orca Security
- Supporting teams that need ARM64 architecture runnersnot Orca Security
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Orca Security
- No public pricing; requires a demo and custom quote from sales.
- Agentless-only scanning may miss some runtime telemetry that agent-based tools capture.
- Full value depends on integrating many of the platform's modules across code, cloud, and AI.
- Primarily targeted at mid-to-large organizations with multi-cloud environments.
WarpBuild
- Per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs
- Large configuration runners (32 vCPU) expensive at $0.064/min
- macOS M4 Pro 12-core at $0.16/min is highest-cost option
- BYOC option requires cloud setup by customer
Pricing, plan by plan
Orca Security
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Orca Security review.
WarpBuild
On request- Linux x86-64 (2vCPU, 8GB)$0.004/minute
- 2 vCPU
- 8 GB RAM
- Standard performance
- Linux x86-64 (4vCPU, 16GB)$0.008/minute
- 4 vCPU
- 16 GB RAM
- Increased performance
- Linux x86-64 (8vCPU, 32GB)$0.016/minute
- 8 vCPU
- 32 GB RAM
- High performance
- Linux x86-64 (16vCPU, 64GB)$0.032/minute
- 16 vCPU
- 64 GB RAM
- Enterprise performance
Which should you pick?
Choose Orca Security if
- You need agentless cloud scanning.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want attack path analysis.
Choose WarpBuild if
- You need optimized runner infrastructure.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud.
- You also want intelligent caching.
Questions people ask
- Is Orca Security or WarpBuild better?
- Neither clearly leads. Orca Security starts at On request and WarpBuild at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Orca Security or WarpBuild?
- Orca Security starts at On request and WarpBuild at On request.
- Does Orca Security or WarpBuild run on more platforms?
- Orca Security runs on web, api. WarpBuild runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud.
- What is Orca Security best used for?
- Orca Security is most often used for gaining full cloud asset visibility without deploying agents, prioritizing cloud risk with attack path correlation, detecting shadow ai usage across cloud environments, scanning code, containers, and iac before deployment. Of those, gaining full cloud asset visibility without deploying agents and prioritizing cloud risk with attack path correlation are not what WarpBuild is typically brought in for.
- What can Orca Security do that WarpBuild cannot?
- Orca Security covers Agentless cloud scanning, Attack path analysis, Shadow AI detection, Secure code development. WarpBuild covers Optimized runner infrastructure, Intelligent caching, Incremental builds, Multi-architecture support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Orca Security: How much does Orca Security cost?
Orca Security does not publish pricing tiers or rates on their website. Organizations must contact Orca Security directly or request a demo to receive custom pricing information based on their specific use case and requirements.
SourceWarpBuild: How much cheaper is WarpBuild compared to GitHub Actions?
WarpBuild offers approximately 50% cost savings compared to GitHub-hosted runners. For example, Linux x86-64 2vCPU/8GB costs $0.004/min with WarpBuild vs $0.008/min with GitHub Actions.
SourceWarpBuild: What is BYOC and how does it differ from managed runners?
BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud) allows customers to run WarpBuild on their own cloud infrastructure at $0.002/min. Managed runners use WarpBuild's cloud infrastructure. BYOC provides lower costs but requires customer setup.
SourceWarpBuild: Does WarpBuild support ARM64 runners?
Yes, WarpBuild offers ARM64 runners at lower costs than x86-64. Linux ARM64 starts at $0.003/min for 2vCPU/8GB configuration.
SourceRelated pages
More on Orca Security
Other head to heads
- Orca Security vs Wiz
- Orca Security vs Akamai
- Orca Security vs Fly.io
- Orca Security vs Northflank
- Orca Security vs Encore
- Orca Security vs Pulumi
- Orca Security vs Portworx
- Orca Security vs Anyscale
- Orca Security vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Orca Security vs Heroku
- Orca Security vs Beam Cloud
- Orca Security vs Cerebrium
- Orca Security vs Longhorn
- Orca Security vs Oracle Cloud
- Orca Security vs Packer
- Orca Security vs minikube
- Orca Security vs OpenTelemetry
- Orca Security vs Blacksmith
- Orca Security vs Depot
- Orca Security vs Namespace
- Orca Security vs Earthly
- Orca Security vs Nx Cloud
- Orca Security vs Garden
- Orca Security vs ConfigCat
- Orca Security vs Dagger
- Orca Security vs Nix
- Orca Security vs Rust
- Orca Security vs Ansible
- Orca Security vs Nixpacks
- Orca Security vs PhpStorm
- Orca Security vs Pieces for Developers
- Orca Security vs RAD Studio
- Orca Security vs Refact
- Orca Security vs Restate
- Orca Security vs RubyMine
- WarpBuild vs Wiz
- WarpBuild vs Akamai
- WarpBuild vs Fly.io
- WarpBuild vs Northflank
- WarpBuild vs Encore
- WarpBuild vs Pulumi
- WarpBuild vs Portworx
- WarpBuild vs Anyscale
- WarpBuild vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- WarpBuild vs Heroku
- WarpBuild vs Beam Cloud
- WarpBuild vs Cerebrium
- WarpBuild vs Longhorn
- WarpBuild vs Oracle Cloud
- WarpBuild vs Packer
- WarpBuild vs minikube
- WarpBuild vs OpenTelemetry
- WarpBuild vs Blacksmith
- WarpBuild vs Depot
- WarpBuild vs Namespace
- WarpBuild vs Earthly
- WarpBuild vs Nx Cloud
- WarpBuild vs Garden
- WarpBuild vs ConfigCat
- WarpBuild vs Dagger
- WarpBuild vs Nix
- WarpBuild vs Rust
- WarpBuild vs Ansible
- WarpBuild vs Nixpacks
- WarpBuild vs PhpStorm
- WarpBuild vs Pieces for Developers
- WarpBuild vs RAD Studio
- WarpBuild vs Refact
- WarpBuild vs Restate
- WarpBuild vs RubyMine
