Developer Tools · head to head
ConfigCat vs Orca Security

ConfigCat
Developer Tools
Feature flag service priced per flag and environment with unlimited seats and unlimited monthly active users
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Orca Security
Cloud
Agentless cloud-native application protection platform for code-to-runtime security.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only ConfigCat has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: ConfigCat there is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.; Orca Security no public pricing; requires a demo and custom quote from sales.
- They diverge on capability: ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Orca Security covers Agentless cloud scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ConfigCat and Orca Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | ConfigCat | Orca Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per month by feature flag and environment count | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go | web, api |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cloud |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ConfigCat
- Feature flags and configuration
- Percentage rollouts
- Targeting rules and segments
- Unlimited seats
- Global CDN delivery
- Audit log
- Public API and webhooks
- SDKs across languages
Only in Orca Security
- Agentless cloud scanning
- Attack path analysis
- Shadow AI detection
- Secure code development
- Alert prioritization
- Workload protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ConfigCat
- A consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-MAU flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worthnot Orca Security
- A team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seatnot Orca Security
- Decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platformnot Orca Security
- A small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tiernot Orca Security
Orca Security
- Gaining full cloud asset visibility without deploying agentsnot ConfigCat
- Prioritizing cloud risk with attack path correlationnot ConfigCat
- Detecting shadow AI usage across cloud environmentsnot ConfigCat
- Scanning code, containers, and IaC before deploymentnot ConfigCat
- Reducing alert fatigue through contextual risk scoringnot ConfigCat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ConfigCat
- There is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.
- Pricing by flag count punishes exactly the hygiene you want: the Pro tier caps at 100 flags, so teams that do not aggressively retire stale flags are pushed to the 325 dollar Smart tier for housekeeping reasons rather than growth.
- The free tier allows only 2 environments, which does not cover the common development, staging and production split, so almost any real deployment starts on a paid plan.
- It is a smaller vendor than the category incumbents, so enterprise procurement teams will find less depth in compliance attestations, contractual terms and reference architecture than LaunchDarkly offers.
- Flag evaluation relies on SDK-side caching of a CDN-delivered config, which is fast but means propagation of a change is eventually consistent rather than instant, something to understand before relying on it as an emergency kill switch.
Orca Security
- No public pricing; requires a demo and custom quote from sales.
- Agentless-only scanning may miss some runtime telemetry that agent-based tools capture.
- Full value depends on integrating many of the platform's modules across code, cloud, and AI.
- Primarily targeted at mid-to-large organizations with multi-cloud environments.
Pricing, plan by plan
ConfigCat
Free- Forever FreeFree
- 10 feature flags
- 2 environments and 2 products
- 2 segments
- Pro$110/month
- 100 feature flags
- 3 environments and 3 products
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Smart$325/month
- Unlimited feature flags
- Unlimited environments, products and segments
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Enterprise$900/month
- Everything in Smart
- Enterprise support and controls
- Unlimited everything on flag counts
Orca Security
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Orca Security review.
Which should you pick?
Choose ConfigCat if
- You need feature flags and configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go.
- You also want percentage rollouts.
Choose Orca Security if
- You need agentless cloud scanning.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want attack path analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is ConfigCat or Orca Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. ConfigCat starts at Free and Orca Security at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ConfigCat or Orca Security?
- ConfigCat has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for ConfigCat and On request for Orca Security.
- Does ConfigCat or Orca Security run on more platforms?
- ConfigCat runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go. Orca Security runs on web, api.
- Can I use ConfigCat for free?
- Yes. ConfigCat has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Orca Security starts at On request.
- What is ConfigCat best used for?
- ConfigCat is most often used for a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth, a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat, decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platform, a small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tier. Of those, a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth and a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat are not what Orca Security is typically brought in for.
- What can ConfigCat do that Orca Security cannot?
- ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Percentage rollouts, Targeting rules and segments, Unlimited seats. Orca Security covers Agentless cloud scanning, Attack path analysis, Shadow AI detection, Secure code development.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ConfigCat: How is ConfigCat priced?
By feature flag, environment and product count. Seats, monthly active users and flag reads are unlimited on every plan.
Orca Security: How much does Orca Security cost?
Orca Security does not publish pricing tiers or rates on their website. Organizations must contact Orca Security directly or request a demo to receive custom pricing information based on their specific use case and requirements.
SourceConfigCat: Is the free tier usable?
For small projects yes, but at 10 flags and 2 environments it will not cover a dev, staging and production setup.
ConfigCat: Can it run A/B tests?
It can split traffic, but there is no statistics engine. You need a separate analytics tool to decide a winner.
ConfigCat: How fast does a flag change take effect?
SDKs poll and cache, so changes propagate on the polling interval rather than instantly.
Related pages
More on Orca Security
Other head to heads
- ConfigCat vs Nix
- ConfigCat vs Depot
- ConfigCat vs Blacksmith
- ConfigCat vs WarpBuild
- ConfigCat vs Namespace
- ConfigCat vs OpsLevel
- ConfigCat vs Earthly
- ConfigCat vs Ansible
- ConfigCat vs Garden
- ConfigCat vs Okteto
- ConfigCat vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- ConfigCat vs Bazel
- ConfigCat vs Backstage
- ConfigCat vs Bitbucket
- ConfigCat vs Claude Code
- ConfigCat vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- ConfigCat vs Cody
- ConfigCat vs Cortex
- ConfigCat vs Wiz
- ConfigCat vs Akamai
- ConfigCat vs Fly.io
- ConfigCat vs Northflank
- ConfigCat vs Encore
- ConfigCat vs Pulumi
- ConfigCat vs Portworx
- ConfigCat vs Anyscale
- ConfigCat vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- ConfigCat vs Heroku
- ConfigCat vs Beam Cloud
- ConfigCat vs Cerebrium
- ConfigCat vs Longhorn
- ConfigCat vs Oracle Cloud
- ConfigCat vs Packer
- ConfigCat vs minikube
- ConfigCat vs OpenTelemetry
- Orca Security vs Nix
- Orca Security vs Depot
- Orca Security vs Blacksmith
- Orca Security vs WarpBuild
- Orca Security vs Namespace
- Orca Security vs OpsLevel
- Orca Security vs Earthly
- Orca Security vs Ansible
- Orca Security vs Garden
- Orca Security vs Okteto
- Orca Security vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Orca Security vs Bazel
- Orca Security vs Backstage
- Orca Security vs Bitbucket
- Orca Security vs Claude Code
- Orca Security vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Orca Security vs Cody
- Orca Security vs Cortex
- Orca Security vs Wiz
- Orca Security vs Akamai
- Orca Security vs Fly.io
- Orca Security vs Northflank
- Orca Security vs Encore
- Orca Security vs Pulumi
- Orca Security vs Portworx
- Orca Security vs Anyscale
- Orca Security vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Orca Security vs Heroku
- Orca Security vs Beam Cloud
- Orca Security vs Cerebrium
- Orca Security vs Longhorn
- Orca Security vs Oracle Cloud
- Orca Security vs Packer
- Orca Security vs minikube
- Orca Security vs OpenTelemetry
