Networking · head to head
Kentik vs OpenVPN

Kentik
Networking
Network observability platform built on flow and traffic data, sold on annual-only contracts starting around $24,000/year
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenVPN
Networking
Open source VPN protocol with a commercial Access Server product priced per simultaneous connection
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenVPN has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Kentik contracts are annual only, so there is no monthly option for a team wanting to trial the platform under real production load before committing to a year of spend; OpenVPN open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- They diverge on capability: Kentik covers Flow-based traffic analysis, OpenVPN covers Open source core.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kentik and OpenVPN actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kentik
- Flow-based traffic analysis
- Synthetic testing
- Cloud network monitoring
- DDoS detection
- API-driven querying
Only in OpenVPN
- Open source core
- Access Server admin UI
- Per-connection licensing
- Free tier
- Cross-platform clients
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kentik
- A network engineering team at an ISP or large enterprise needing flow-level traffic visibility beyond basic uptime monitoringnot OpenVPN
- A cloud-heavy organisation wanting visibility into cloud provider network cost and performance across multiple providersnot OpenVPN
- A security or network operations team wanting DDoS detection layered on top of standard traffic monitoringnot OpenVPN
- A team needing synthetic testing alongside passive flow analysis in one platform rather than two separate toolsnot OpenVPN
OpenVPN
- A technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured VPN server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationshipnot Kentik
- A small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer VPN server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employeenot Kentik
- An organisation with more staff than typical concurrent VPN usage, since Access Server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accountsnot Kentik
- An IoT or large-scale deployment needing custom Enterprise pricing above 2,000 connectionsnot Kentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kentik
- Contracts are annual only, so there is no monthly option for a team wanting to trial the platform under real production load before committing to a year of spend
- The Pro tier's $24,000/year starting price is a serious commitment relative to general infrastructure monitoring tools, and it is aimed specifically at flow-level traffic visibility rather than general host monitoring
- Add-on modules for advanced DDoS protection, service provider analytics and the Firehose pipeline are priced separately, so real deployment cost frequently exceeds the Pro sticker price
- Premier tier pricing is entirely quote-based, so organisations needing more than Pro's limits (50 users, 1,000 FPS, 120-day retention) cannot get a number without a sales conversation
- It is a specialised flow and traffic analytics tool, not a general infrastructure monitoring platform, so most buyers will still need a separate tool like PRTG or Icinga for host and service uptime checks
- Data retention is capped at 120 days for traffic and 45 days for forensic data even on Pro, which may be short for organisations with longer compliance or investigation requirements
OpenVPN
- Open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- Per-connection billing on Access Server means usage spikes, such as an all-hands remote day, can push simultaneous connections over a licensed limit and block new connections until usage drops or the plan is upgraded
- OpenVPN's traditional hub-and-spoke architecture routes traffic through a central server, unlike mesh VPN tools like Tailscale or NetBird that establish direct peer-to-peer connections where possible, which can add latency
- Client configuration and certificate management for the open source version is more manual and error-prone than newer VPN tools with zero-config onboarding
- Access Server pricing above the Growth tier reverts to custom Enterprise quoting, so very large deployments lose the pricing transparency of the lower tiers
- The protocol's throughput is generally lower than newer kernel-integrated protocols like WireGuard under equivalent conditions, which matters for high-bandwidth use cases
Pricing, plan by plan
Kentik
On request- Pro$24000/year
- 50 users
- 1,000 flows per second baseline
- 2.5M synthetics credits
- Premier$undefined/year
- 1,000 users
- 5M synthetics credits
- Custom dimensions and scheduled reporting
OpenVPN
Free- Access Server FreeFree
- Up to 2 simultaneous connections
- All features included
- Access Server Growth$7/month
- Per simultaneous connection beyond the free tier
- Annual billing
- Access Server Enterprise/IoT$undefined/month
- Custom pricing for 2,000+ connections
Which should you pick?
Choose Kentik if
- You need flow-based traffic analysis.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want synthetic testing.
Choose OpenVPN if
- You need open source core.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want access server admin ui.
Questions people ask
- Is Kentik or OpenVPN better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kentik starts at On request and OpenVPN at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kentik or OpenVPN?
- OpenVPN has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Kentik and Free for OpenVPN.
- Does Kentik or OpenVPN run on more platforms?
- Kentik runs on Web, API. OpenVPN runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- Can I use OpenVPN for free?
- Yes. OpenVPN has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Kentik starts at On request.
- What is Kentik best used for?
- Kentik is most often used for a network engineering team at an isp or large enterprise needing flow-level traffic visibility beyond basic uptime monitoring, a cloud-heavy organisation wanting visibility into cloud provider network cost and performance across multiple providers, a security or network operations team wanting ddos detection layered on top of standard traffic monitoring, a team needing synthetic testing alongside passive flow analysis in one platform rather than two separate tools. Of those, a network engineering team at an isp or large enterprise needing flow-level traffic visibility beyond basic uptime monitoring and a cloud-heavy organisation wanting visibility into cloud provider network cost and performance across multiple providers are not what OpenVPN is typically brought in for.
- What can Kentik do that OpenVPN cannot?
- Kentik covers Flow-based traffic analysis, Synthetic testing, Cloud network monitoring, DDoS detection. OpenVPN covers Open source core, Access Server admin UI, Per-connection licensing, Free tier.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kentik: Is there a monthly billing option?
No, Kentik states contracts are annual only.
OpenVPN: Is OpenVPN free?
The open source protocol and software are free under the GPL; Access Server, the commercial packaged product, charges per simultaneous connection beyond a free 2-connection tier.
Kentik: What is the entry price?
Pro starts at $2,000/month billed as $24,000/year for 50 users and baseline flow and synthetics quotas.
OpenVPN: What counts as a connection for billing purposes?
A simultaneously active connected device, not a registered user account or total device count; unlimited accounts and devices can be created but only the licensed number can be connected at once.
Kentik: Does Kentik replace general infrastructure monitoring tools like PRTG?
No, it is focused on flow-based traffic and network observability rather than general host and service uptime monitoring.
OpenVPN: How does OpenVPN compare with WireGuard-based tools like Tailscale?
OpenVPN uses a traditional hub-and-spoke VPN architecture rather than the mesh, peer-to-peer approach used by newer tools like Tailscale or NetBird.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Kentik vs Auvik
- Kentik vs Domotz
- Kentik vs ThousandEyes
- Kentik vs Catchpoint
- Kentik vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Kentik vs ngrok
- Kentik vs Grafana
- Kentik vs Consul
- Kentik vs Tailscale
- Kentik vs Cisco Meraki
- Kentik vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Kentik vs Zabbix
- Kentik vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Kentik vs Headscale
- Kentik vs HiveMQ
- Kentik vs pfSense
- Kentik vs ZeroTier
- Kentik vs Icinga
- Kentik vs LibreNMS
- Kentik vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Kentik vs Twingate
- Kentik vs OPNsense
- Kentik vs Nebula
- Kentik vs Palo Alto Networks
- Kentik vs Splunk
- OpenVPN vs Auvik
- OpenVPN vs Domotz
- OpenVPN vs ThousandEyes
- OpenVPN vs Catchpoint
- OpenVPN vs PRTG Network Monitor
- OpenVPN vs ngrok
- OpenVPN vs Grafana
- OpenVPN vs Consul
- OpenVPN vs Tailscale
- OpenVPN vs Cisco Meraki
- OpenVPN vs MikroTik RouterOS
- OpenVPN vs Zabbix
- OpenVPN vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- OpenVPN vs Headscale
- OpenVPN vs HiveMQ
- OpenVPN vs pfSense
- OpenVPN vs ZeroTier
- OpenVPN vs Icinga
- OpenVPN vs LibreNMS
- OpenVPN vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- OpenVPN vs Twingate
- OpenVPN vs OPNsense
- OpenVPN vs Nebula
- OpenVPN vs Palo Alto Networks
- OpenVPN vs Splunk
