Networking · head to head
HiveMQ vs Kentik

HiveMQ
Networking
Enterprise MQTT broker for industrial IoT with a published self-managed price list
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Kentik
Networking
Network observability platform built on flow and traffic data, sold on annual-only contracts starting around $24,000/year
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only HiveMQ has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: HiveMQ the Community Edition lacks clustering, persistence extensions, the control centre and all enterprise bridges, so a prototype built on it does not become production by buying support.; Kentik contracts are annual only, so there is no monthly option for a team wanting to trial the platform under real production load before committing to a year of spend
- They diverge on capability: HiveMQ covers MQTT 5 and 3.1.1, Kentik covers Flow-based traffic analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which HiveMQ and Kentik actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in HiveMQ
- MQTT 5 and 3.1.1
- Native clustering
- Data Hub
- Extension framework
- Enterprise bridges
- Control centre
Only in Kentik
- Flow-based traffic analysis
- Synthetic testing
- Cloud network monitoring
- DDoS detection
- API-driven querying
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
HiveMQ
- A connected vehicle fleet where devices drop off the network for hours and sessions must survivenot Kentik
- An industrial plant bridging MQTT telemetry into Kafka without writing and operating the bridgenot Kentik
- A utility that needs message-level schema validation so one faulty firmware release cannot corrupt the data lakenot Kentik
- An IoT project that needs a self-managed broker price for a budget submission without entering a sales processnot Kentik
Kentik
- A network engineering team at an ISP or large enterprise needing flow-level traffic visibility beyond basic uptime monitoringnot HiveMQ
- A cloud-heavy organisation wanting visibility into cloud provider network cost and performance across multiple providersnot HiveMQ
- A security or network operations team wanting DDoS detection layered on top of standard traffic monitoringnot HiveMQ
- A team needing synthetic testing alongside passive flow analysis in one platform rather than two separate toolsnot HiveMQ
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
HiveMQ
- The Community Edition lacks clustering, persistence extensions, the control centre and all enterprise bridges, so a prototype built on it does not become production by buying support.
- The entry commercial tiers cap at ten thousand connections, and device fleets grow, so the step to Enterprise capacity pricing arrives sooner than most projects plan for.
- It is a JVM application, so memory tuning and garbage collection behaviour become the operator’s problem at high connection counts, unlike the C-based brokers in this space.
- Extensions are written in Java against HiveMQ’s SPI, which means custom authentication logic is locked to the platform and cannot move to another broker.
- For simple use cases it is substantially heavier and more expensive than Mosquitto or EMQX, and small deployments frequently pay enterprise prices for clustering they never use.
Kentik
- Contracts are annual only, so there is no monthly option for a team wanting to trial the platform under real production load before committing to a year of spend
- The Pro tier's $24,000/year starting price is a serious commitment relative to general infrastructure monitoring tools, and it is aimed specifically at flow-level traffic visibility rather than general host monitoring
- Add-on modules for advanced DDoS protection, service provider analytics and the Firehose pipeline are priced separately, so real deployment cost frequently exceeds the Pro sticker price
- Premier tier pricing is entirely quote-based, so organisations needing more than Pro's limits (50 users, 1,000 FPS, 120-day retention) cannot get a number without a sales conversation
- It is a specialised flow and traffic analytics tool, not a general infrastructure monitoring platform, so most buyers will still need a separate tool like PRTG or Icinga for host and service uptime checks
- Data retention is capped at 120 days for traffic and 45 days for forensic data even on Pro, which may be short for organisations with longer compliance or investigation requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
HiveMQ
Free- Community EditionFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- MQTT 3.1.1 and 5 support
- Single broker, no clustering
- Launch$299/month
- Ten thousand connections
- Five hundred messages per second
- Single broker deployment
- Run$499/month
- Ten thousand connections
- One thousand messages per second
- Single broker deployment
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Priced by connections and throughput
- Multi-broker and multi-site deployments
- Distributed data intelligence
Kentik
On request- Pro$24000/year
- 50 users
- 1,000 flows per second baseline
- 2.5M synthetics credits
- Premier$undefined/year
- 1,000 users
- 5M synthetics credits
- Custom dimensions and scheduled reporting
Which should you pick?
Choose HiveMQ if
- You need mqtt 5 and 3.1.1.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want native clustering.
Choose Kentik if
- You need flow-based traffic analysis.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want synthetic testing.
Questions people ask
- Is HiveMQ or Kentik better?
- Neither clearly leads. HiveMQ starts at Free and Kentik at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, HiveMQ or Kentik?
- HiveMQ has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for HiveMQ and On request for Kentik.
- Does HiveMQ or Kentik run on more platforms?
- HiveMQ runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web. Kentik runs on Web, API.
- Can I use HiveMQ for free?
- Yes. HiveMQ has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Kentik starts at On request.
- What is HiveMQ best used for?
- HiveMQ is most often used for a connected vehicle fleet where devices drop off the network for hours and sessions must survive, an industrial plant bridging mqtt telemetry into kafka without writing and operating the bridge, a utility that needs message-level schema validation so one faulty firmware release cannot corrupt the data lake, an iot project that needs a self-managed broker price for a budget submission without entering a sales process. Of those, a connected vehicle fleet where devices drop off the network for hours and sessions must survive and an industrial plant bridging mqtt telemetry into kafka without writing and operating the bridge are not what Kentik is typically brought in for.
- What can HiveMQ do that Kentik cannot?
- HiveMQ covers MQTT 5 and 3.1.1, Native clustering, Data Hub, Extension framework. Kentik covers Flow-based traffic analysis, Synthetic testing, Cloud network monitoring, DDoS detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
HiveMQ: Is HiveMQ free?
The Community Edition is Apache 2.0 and free, but it has no clustering and none of the enterprise extensions.
Kentik: Is there a monthly billing option?
No, Kentik states contracts are annual only.
HiveMQ: What does the commercial version cost?
Self-managed Launch is 299 US dollars a month for ten thousand connections; Run is 499 with higher throughput.
Kentik: What is the entry price?
Pro starts at $2,000/month billed as $24,000/year for 50 users and baseline flow and synthetics quotas.
HiveMQ: Does it support MQTT 5?
Yes, both MQTT 5 and 3.1.1, including shared subscriptions and session expiry intervals.
Kentik: Does Kentik replace general infrastructure monitoring tools like PRTG?
No, it is focused on flow-based traffic and network observability rather than general host and service uptime monitoring.
HiveMQ: Can it bridge into Kafka?
Yes, via a commercial enterprise extension, not in the Community Edition.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- HiveMQ vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- HiveMQ vs Catchpoint
- HiveMQ vs Domotz
- HiveMQ vs NetBird
- HiveMQ vs pfSense
- HiveMQ vs Auvik
- HiveMQ vs Zabbix
- HiveMQ vs Ivanti
- HiveMQ vs Cisco Meraki
- HiveMQ vs LibreNMS
- HiveMQ vs OpenVPN
- HiveMQ vs Icinga
- HiveMQ vs MikroTik RouterOS
- HiveMQ vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- HiveMQ vs ThousandEyes
- HiveMQ vs PRTG Network Monitor
- HiveMQ vs ngrok
- HiveMQ vs Grafana
- HiveMQ vs Consul
- HiveMQ vs Tailscale
- HiveMQ vs Headscale
- Kentik vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Kentik vs Catchpoint
- Kentik vs Domotz
- Kentik vs NetBird
- Kentik vs pfSense
- Kentik vs Auvik
- Kentik vs Zabbix
- Kentik vs Ivanti
- Kentik vs Cisco Meraki
- Kentik vs LibreNMS
- Kentik vs OpenVPN
- Kentik vs Icinga
- Kentik vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Kentik vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Kentik vs ThousandEyes
- Kentik vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Kentik vs ngrok
- Kentik vs Grafana
- Kentik vs Consul
- Kentik vs Tailscale
- Kentik vs Headscale
