Networking · head to head
Domotz vs OpenVPN

Domotz
Networking
Network monitoring for MSPs and IT teams priced per managed device or per collector, with published rates
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenVPN
Networking
Open source VPN protocol with a commercial Access Server product priced per simultaneous connection
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenVPN has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Domotz the Managed Device Plan bills in bundles of ten, so a network with, for example, eleven devices to manage pays for twenty rather than a precise count; OpenVPN open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- They diverge on capability: Domotz covers Device discovery and monitoring, OpenVPN covers Open source core.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Domotz and OpenVPN actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Domotz
- Device discovery and monitoring
- Remote access without VPN
- Two published pricing models
- Automated alerting
- MSP client segregation
Only in OpenVPN
- Open source core
- Access Server admin UI
- Per-connection licensing
- Free tier
- Cross-platform clients
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Domotz
- An MSP with high device density per client site wanting predictable flat pricing per collector rather than counting individual devicesnot OpenVPN
- An IT integrator managing many small sites with few devices each, better served by per-device pricing than a flat collector feenot OpenVPN
- A field services or retail IT team needing remote access to branch equipment without configuring VPN tunnels to each sitenot OpenVPN
- A team wanting a directly comparable public price against Auvik before starting a sales conversation with either vendornot OpenVPN
OpenVPN
- A technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured VPN server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationshipnot Domotz
- A small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer VPN server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employeenot Domotz
- An organisation with more staff than typical concurrent VPN usage, since Access Server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accountsnot Domotz
- An IoT or large-scale deployment needing custom Enterprise pricing above 2,000 connectionsnot Domotz
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Domotz
- The Managed Device Plan bills in bundles of ten, so a network with, for example, eleven devices to manage pays for twenty rather than a precise count
- The Collector Plan gives full access per collector regardless of device count monitored by that collector, which can be inefficient for a site with very few devices relative to the flat $35 fee
- As a SaaS platform, ongoing monitoring depends on the local Collector maintaining connectivity to Domotz's cloud, so a site-level outage that also cuts collector connectivity limits remote visibility exactly when it is needed
- Feature depth for large enterprise NOC-style operations is narrower than platforms built for that scale, since Domotz's roadmap centres on MSP and integrator use cases
- Remote access without VPN configuration is convenient but depends on Domotz's own relay infrastructure remaining available and trusted, which is a different security posture than a customer-controlled VPN
- Volume and annual discounts exist but the specific discount schedule is not fully published, so very large deployments still benefit from negotiating directly rather than relying on the list price
OpenVPN
- Open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- Per-connection billing on Access Server means usage spikes, such as an all-hands remote day, can push simultaneous connections over a licensed limit and block new connections until usage drops or the plan is upgraded
- OpenVPN's traditional hub-and-spoke architecture routes traffic through a central server, unlike mesh VPN tools like Tailscale or NetBird that establish direct peer-to-peer connections where possible, which can add latency
- Client configuration and certificate management for the open source version is more manual and error-prone than newer VPN tools with zero-config onboarding
- Access Server pricing above the Growth tier reverts to custom Enterprise quoting, so very large deployments lose the pricing transparency of the lower tiers
- The protocol's throughput is generally lower than newer kernel-integrated protocols like WireGuard under equivalent conditions, which matters for high-bandwidth use cases
Pricing, plan by plan
Domotz
On request- Collector Plan$35/month
- Full platform access on every device that collector monitors
- Managed Device Plan$1.5/month
- Billed in bundles of 10 devices
- All non-managed devices on the network discovered at no extra cost
OpenVPN
Free- Access Server FreeFree
- Up to 2 simultaneous connections
- All features included
- Access Server Growth$7/month
- Per simultaneous connection beyond the free tier
- Annual billing
- Access Server Enterprise/IoT$undefined/month
- Custom pricing for 2,000+ connections
Which should you pick?
Choose Domotz if
- You need device discovery and monitoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want remote access without vpn.
Choose OpenVPN if
- You need open source core.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want access server admin ui.
Questions people ask
- Is Domotz or OpenVPN better?
- Neither clearly leads. Domotz starts at On request and OpenVPN at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Domotz or OpenVPN?
- OpenVPN has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Domotz and Free for OpenVPN.
- Does Domotz or OpenVPN run on more platforms?
- Domotz runs on Web, iOS, Android. OpenVPN runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- Can I use OpenVPN for free?
- Yes. OpenVPN has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Domotz starts at On request.
- What is Domotz best used for?
- Domotz is most often used for an msp with high device density per client site wanting predictable flat pricing per collector rather than counting individual devices, an it integrator managing many small sites with few devices each, better served by per-device pricing than a flat collector fee, a field services or retail it team needing remote access to branch equipment without configuring vpn tunnels to each site, a team wanting a directly comparable public price against auvik before starting a sales conversation with either vendor. Of those, an msp with high device density per client site wanting predictable flat pricing per collector rather than counting individual devices and an it integrator managing many small sites with few devices each, better served by per-device pricing than a flat collector fee are not what OpenVPN is typically brought in for.
- What can Domotz do that OpenVPN cannot?
- Domotz covers Device discovery and monitoring, Remote access without VPN, Two published pricing models, Automated alerting. OpenVPN covers Open source core, Access Server admin UI, Per-connection licensing, Free tier.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Domotz: Is pricing based on networks, sites or devices?
Devices. Domotz states explicitly there are no per-site, per-network or per-user charges.
OpenVPN: Is OpenVPN free?
The open source protocol and software are free under the GPL; Access Server, the commercial packaged product, charges per simultaneous connection beyond a free 2-connection tier.
Domotz: What is the difference between the two plans?
The Collector Plan is a flat $35/month per collector with full access to everything that collector monitors; the Managed Device Plan is $1.50/month per device, billed in bundles of ten.
OpenVPN: What counts as a connection for billing purposes?
A simultaneously active connected device, not a registered user account or total device count; unlimited accounts and devices can be created but only the licensed number can be connected at once.
Domotz: Is there a free trial?
Yes, a 14-day free trial is offered.
OpenVPN: How does OpenVPN compare with WireGuard-based tools like Tailscale?
OpenVPN uses a traditional hub-and-spoke VPN architecture rather than the mesh, peer-to-peer approach used by newer tools like Tailscale or NetBird.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Domotz vs Auvik
- Domotz vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Domotz vs Kentik
- Domotz vs ThousandEyes
- Domotz vs Twingate
- Domotz vs LibreNMS
- Domotz vs Icinga
- Domotz vs Zabbix
- Domotz vs HiveMQ
- Domotz vs Tailscale
- Domotz vs Catchpoint
- Domotz vs Netdata
- Domotz vs OPNsense
- Domotz vs Traefik
- Domotz vs ZeroTier
- Domotz vs Juniper Mist
- Domotz vs pfSense
- Domotz vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Domotz vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Domotz vs Consul
- Domotz vs Nebula
- Domotz vs ngrok
- Domotz vs Palo Alto Networks
- Domotz vs Splunk
- OpenVPN vs Auvik
- OpenVPN vs PRTG Network Monitor
- OpenVPN vs Kentik
- OpenVPN vs ThousandEyes
- OpenVPN vs Twingate
- OpenVPN vs LibreNMS
- OpenVPN vs Icinga
- OpenVPN vs Zabbix
- OpenVPN vs HiveMQ
- OpenVPN vs Tailscale
- OpenVPN vs Catchpoint
- OpenVPN vs Netdata
- OpenVPN vs OPNsense
- OpenVPN vs Traefik
- OpenVPN vs ZeroTier
- OpenVPN vs Juniper Mist
- OpenVPN vs pfSense
- OpenVPN vs MikroTik RouterOS
- OpenVPN vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- OpenVPN vs Consul
- OpenVPN vs Nebula
- OpenVPN vs ngrok
- OpenVPN vs Palo Alto Networks
- OpenVPN vs Splunk
