Cloud · head to head
OpenTelemetry vs Steampipe
OpenTelemetry
Cloud
Vendor-neutral standard for traces, metrics and logs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Steampipe
Developer Tools
Query cloud APIs, SaaS tools and code with SQL, with no extract or load step
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OpenTelemetry genuinely complex to adopt: collectors, pipelines, samplers and exporters are a system to run in their own right; Steampipe aGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- They diverge on capability: OpenTelemetry covers Vendor-neutral SDKs, Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenTelemetry and Steampipe actually diverge.
| Attribute | OpenTelemetry | Steampipe |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Open source, with paid hosting through Turbot Pipes |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web |
| Category | Cloud | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenTelemetry
- Vendor-neutral SDKs
- Collector
- Three signals
- Auto-instrumentation
Only in Steampipe
- SQL over live APIs
- Wide plugin set
- Embedded Postgres
- Compliance benchmarks
- Joins across providers
- Hosted option
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenTelemetry
- Instrumenting once and keeping the option to change observability vendor laternot Steampipe
- Standardising telemetry across services written in different languagesnot Steampipe
- Routing and filtering telemetry centrally to control observability spendnot Steampipe
Steampipe
- Security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly exportnot OpenTelemetry
- Compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is askednot OpenTelemetry
- Inventory and drift questions spanning several cloud providers in one querynot OpenTelemetry
- Engineers who would rather write SQL than learn each provider command line toolnot OpenTelemetry
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenTelemetry
- Genuinely complex to adopt: collectors, pipelines, samplers and exporters are a system to run in their own right
- Language SDKs mature at different rates, so a polyglot estate gets uneven support
- It produces and moves telemetry but does not store or visualise it, so a backend is still required and still billed
Steampipe
- AGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- Dashboards, benchmarks and mods were removed from Steampipe entirely at version 1.0 in October 2024 and now live in a separate product, so pre-2024 documentation and tutorials describe commands that no longer exist.
- Live querying is bound by cloud provider API rate limits and keeps no persistent store by default, which is why a separate DuckDB-backed product exists for log volumes and why large accounts return slowly.
- The company is fifteen people and bootstrapped, maintaining four command line tools plus a hosted service plus two further products, and the newer tools have thin community traction relative to that surface area.
- Hosted tiers include only three users regardless of tier, with additional Enterprise users charged separately, so a team of thirty costs an order of magnitude more than the headline figure before compute and storage are counted.
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenTelemetry
Free- OpenTelemetryFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Steampipe
Free- Steampipe CLIFree
- AGPL-3.0
- All plugins
- No user or query limits
- Pipes DeveloperFree
- One user
- 400 compute minutes
- 3GB storage
- Pipes Team$49/month
- Three users
- 2,000 compute minutes
- 20GB storage
- Pipes Enterprise$249/month
- Three users
- 10,000 compute minutes
- 100GB storage
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenTelemetry if
- You need vendor-neutral sdks.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker.
- You also want collector.
Choose Steampipe if
- You need sql over live apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- You also want wide plugin set.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenTelemetry or Steampipe better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenTelemetry starts at Free and Steampipe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenTelemetry or Steampipe?
- OpenTelemetry starts at Free and Steampipe at Free.
- Does OpenTelemetry or Steampipe run on more platforms?
- OpenTelemetry runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker. Steampipe runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- Can I use OpenTelemetry for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is OpenTelemetry best used for?
- OpenTelemetry is most often used for instrumenting once and keeping the option to change observability vendor later, standardising telemetry across services written in different languages, routing and filtering telemetry centrally to control observability spend. Of those, instrumenting once and keeping the option to change observability vendor later and standardising telemetry across services written in different languages are not what Steampipe is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenTelemetry do that Steampipe cannot?
- OpenTelemetry covers Vendor-neutral SDKs, Collector, Three signals, Auto-instrumentation. Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs, Wide plugin set, Embedded Postgres, Compliance benchmarks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenTelemetry: Is OpenTelemetry free?
Yes, open source under the CNCF. What you pay for is the backend you export to.
Steampipe: When did Steampipe become AGPL?
May 2021, about four months after the project went public. It is a settled licence rather than a recent change, and predates the Business Source Licence wave it is often confused with.
OpenTelemetry: Does OpenTelemetry replace Datadog or Grafana?
No. It replaces their proprietary agents and instrumentation libraries. You still need a backend to store and query the data.
Steampipe: Where did the dashboards and benchmarks go?
Into Powerpipe. They were deprecated in March 2024 and removed from Steampipe at version 1.0 in October 2024, so the check, dashboard, mod and variable commands are gone.
OpenTelemetry: Why adopt a vendor-neutral standard?
Because instrumentation is the expensive part. Once code emits OTel, changing observability vendor is a collector config change instead of re-instrumenting every service.
Steampipe: Is it fast on a large cloud estate?
Not always. Queries call provider APIs at request time, so rate limits rather than query planning set the pace, and there is no persistent store by default.
Steampipe: Does the AGPL affect internal use?
Running it internally for your own analysis is fine. Putting a web interface in front of it that other people use is where the network clause becomes a question for your legal team.
Steampipe: Is a bootstrapped vendor a risk?
It cuts both ways. There is no investor pressure toward a licence change or an exit, and there are also fifteen people supporting a large product surface.
Related pages
More on OpenTelemetry
Other head to heads
- OpenTelemetry vs Zipkin
- OpenTelemetry vs Grafana Cloud
- OpenTelemetry vs VictoriaMetrics
- OpenTelemetry vs OpenEBS
- OpenTelemetry vs Fly.io
- OpenTelemetry vs Cerebrium
- OpenTelemetry vs Northflank
- OpenTelemetry vs Oracle Cloud
- OpenTelemetry vs Porter
- OpenTelemetry vs Serverless Framework
- OpenTelemetry vs CapRover
- OpenTelemetry vs Coolify
- OpenTelemetry vs IBM Cloud
- OpenTelemetry vs Koyeb
- OpenTelemetry vs Microsoft Azure
- OpenTelemetry vs Nitric
- OpenTelemetry vs Nomad
- OpenTelemetry vs Atlantis
- OpenTelemetry vs Jitsu
- OpenTelemetry vs Frappe
- OpenTelemetry vs Visual Studio Code
- OpenTelemetry vs Penpot
- OpenTelemetry vs GNU Emacs
- OpenTelemetry vs Bazel
- OpenTelemetry vs Eclipse IDE
- OpenTelemetry vs Pants Build
- OpenTelemetry vs Swagger UI
- OpenTelemetry vs Ansible
- OpenTelemetry vs Helix
- OpenTelemetry vs JFrog Artifactory
- OpenTelemetry vs Namespace
- OpenTelemetry vs Nix
- OpenTelemetry vs Nixpacks
- OpenTelemetry vs Octopus Deploy
- OpenTelemetry vs Okteto
- Steampipe vs Zipkin
- Steampipe vs Grafana Cloud
- Steampipe vs VictoriaMetrics
- Steampipe vs OpenEBS
- Steampipe vs Fly.io
- Steampipe vs Cerebrium
- Steampipe vs Northflank
- Steampipe vs Oracle Cloud
- Steampipe vs Porter
- Steampipe vs Serverless Framework
- Steampipe vs CapRover
- Steampipe vs Coolify
- Steampipe vs IBM Cloud
- Steampipe vs Koyeb
- Steampipe vs Microsoft Azure
- Steampipe vs Nitric
- Steampipe vs Nomad
- Steampipe vs Atlantis
- Steampipe vs Jitsu
- Steampipe vs Frappe
- Steampipe vs Visual Studio Code
- Steampipe vs Penpot
- Steampipe vs GNU Emacs
- Steampipe vs Bazel
- Steampipe vs Eclipse IDE
- Steampipe vs Pants Build
- Steampipe vs Swagger UI
- Steampipe vs Ansible
- Steampipe vs Helix
- Steampipe vs JFrog Artifactory
- Steampipe vs Namespace
- Steampipe vs Nix
- Steampipe vs Nixpacks
- Steampipe vs Octopus Deploy
- Steampipe vs Okteto