Logging · head to head
Openstatus vs Telegraf

Openstatus
Logging
Status pages with uptime monitoring and compliance-ready incident tracking
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Telegraf
Logging
The Plugin-Driven Server Agent for Collecting and Reporting Metrics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Openstatus free tier severely limited to 1 monitor and 1 status page; Telegraf telegraf's core is open source and free, and InfluxData names a separate Telegraf Enterprise tier for teams running it at scale with no price published
- They diverge on capability: Openstatus covers Branded status pages, Telegraf covers Metrics collection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Openstatus and Telegraf actually diverge.
| Attribute | Openstatus | Telegraf |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | open-source |
| Founded | 2023 | 2013 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, API), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Openstatus
- Branded status pages
- Global monitoring
- Incident notifications
- Audit-ready trails
- API and CLI access
- Terraform provider
- Self-hosting
Only in Telegraf
- Metrics collection
- System monitoring
- Application monitoring
- Plugin architecture
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Openstatus
- Publishing incident status pages to customersnot Telegraf
- Demonstrating compliance readiness to auditorsnot Telegraf
- Alerting internal teams when services are downnot Telegraf
- Tracking uptime metrics across global regionsnot Telegraf
Telegraf
- Log monitoringnot Openstatus
- Application performancenot Openstatus
- Security analyticsnot Openstatus
- Troubleshootingnot Openstatus
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Openstatus
- Free tier severely limited to 1 monitor and 1 status page
- Per-status-page pricing adds cost for multi-product organizations
- No built-in workflow orchestration or incident response automation
- Limited historical analytics beyond incident documentation
- No AI-powered incident diagnosis or root cause analysis
Telegraf
- Telegraf's core is open source and free, and InfluxData names a separate Telegraf Enterprise tier for teams running it at scale with no price published
Pricing, plan by plan
Openstatus
Free- FreeFree
- 1 monitor with 10-minute intervals
- 1 status page with 3 components
- No credit card required
- Starter$30/month
- 20 monitors with 1-minute intervals
- 1 status page with 20 components
- 3-month data retention
- Pro$100/month
- 50 monitors with 30-second intervals
- 5 status pages with 50 components each
- 12-month data retention
- Scale$500/month
- 50 monitors with 30-second intervals
- 10 status pages with 500 components each
- 24-month data retention
Telegraf
Free- FreeFree
- Metrics collection
- System monitoring
- Application monitoring
Which should you pick?
Choose Openstatus if
- You need branded status pages.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want global monitoring.
Choose Telegraf if
- You need metrics collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want system monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Openstatus or Telegraf better?
- Neither clearly leads. Openstatus starts at Free and Telegraf at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Openstatus or Telegraf?
- Openstatus starts at Free and Telegraf at Free.
- Does Openstatus or Telegraf run on more platforms?
- Openstatus runs on Web, API. Telegraf runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Openstatus for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Openstatus best used for?
- Openstatus is most often used for publishing incident status pages to customers, demonstrating compliance readiness to auditors, alerting internal teams when services are down, tracking uptime metrics across global regions. Of those, publishing incident status pages to customers and demonstrating compliance readiness to auditors are not what Telegraf is typically brought in for.
- What can Openstatus do that Telegraf cannot?
- Openstatus covers Branded status pages, Global monitoring, Incident notifications, Audit-ready trails. Telegraf covers Metrics collection, System monitoring, Application monitoring, Plugin architecture.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Openstatus: Can I use OpenStatus for free?
Yes, the free tier includes 1 monitor with 10-minute check intervals and 1 status page with 3 components, no credit card required.
SourceTelegraf: Is Telegraf free to use?
Yes, Telegraf OSS is free and open source. It can be downloaded and used at no cost for collecting metrics from infrastructure, applications, and devices using over 400 community-tested plugins.
SourceOpenstatus: What is included in annual billing for Starter plan?
Annual billing costs $300/year (vs $360/month), saving 2 months. Includes 20 monitors, 1-minute intervals, and all alert types.
SourceTelegraf: What is Telegraf Enterprise and how much does it cost?
Telegraf Enterprise is a commercial offering for managing Telegraf at scale. It is licensed annually with entry-level packages starting at $18,000 per year, and pricing scales based on the total number of Telegraf agents under management.
SourceOpenstatus: Can I add extra status pages beyond my plan limit?
Yes, additional status pages cost $20/month and are billed separately on top of your plan.
SourceTelegraf: Can I try Telegraf Enterprise before purchasing?
Yes, a free tier of Telegraf Controller is available for evaluation. It allows you to store up to 20 configurations and manage up to 100 reporting agents.
SourceTelegraf: Can Telegraf OSS be used for commercial purposes?
Telegraf OSS is free and available as open source software, suitable for commercial deployments without licensing fees. For large-scale enterprise needs, Telegraf Enterprise is the commercial offering.
SourceTelegraf: How many plugins does Telegraf support?
Telegraf includes over 400 community-tested plugins that can connect to various data sources and destinations including Kubernetes, Docker, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, Kafka, and many databases.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Openstatus vs incident.io
- Openstatus vs Cronitor
- Openstatus vs Healthchecks
- Openstatus vs FireHydrant
- Openstatus vs Rootly
- Openstatus vs Checkly
- Openstatus vs Uptime.com
- Openstatus vs Honeybadger
- Openstatus vs Better Stack
- Openstatus vs InfluxDB
- Openstatus vs Dynatrace
- Openstatus vs Airbrake
- Openstatus vs Loggly
- Openstatus vs Logstash
- Openstatus vs Logz.io
- Openstatus vs Loki
- Openstatus vs Mezmo
- Openstatus vs New Relic Logs
- Openstatus vs Coralogix
- Openstatus vs Elastic Stack
- Openstatus vs New Relic
- Openstatus vs Datadog Logs
- Openstatus vs Fluentd
- Openstatus vs Graylog
- Openstatus vs Traceloop
- Openstatus vs Raygun
- Openstatus vs Humio
- Openstatus vs ELK Stack
- Openstatus vs Kibana
- Telegraf vs incident.io
- Telegraf vs Cronitor
- Telegraf vs Healthchecks
- Telegraf vs FireHydrant
- Telegraf vs Rootly
- Telegraf vs Checkly
- Telegraf vs Uptime.com
- Telegraf vs Honeybadger
- Telegraf vs Better Stack
- Telegraf vs InfluxDB
- Telegraf vs Dynatrace
- Telegraf vs Airbrake
- Telegraf vs Loggly
- Telegraf vs Logstash
- Telegraf vs Logz.io
- Telegraf vs Loki
- Telegraf vs Mezmo
- Telegraf vs New Relic Logs
- Telegraf vs Coralogix
- Telegraf vs Elastic Stack
- Telegraf vs New Relic
- Telegraf vs Datadog Logs
- Telegraf vs Fluentd
- Telegraf vs Graylog
- Telegraf vs Traceloop
- Telegraf vs Raygun
- Telegraf vs Humio
- Telegraf vs ELK Stack
- Telegraf vs Kibana
