Developer Tools · head to head
Octopus Deploy vs Sigstore

Octopus Deploy
Developer Tools
Continuous delivery and runbook automation for releases
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Sigstore
Cybersecurity
Free public signing and transparency infrastructure for open source artifacts
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Octopus Deploy free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space; Sigstore the security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Octopus Deploy and Sigstore actually diverge.
| Attribute | Octopus Deploy | Sigstore |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, public instance free to use |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Octopus Deploy
Nothing recorded that Sigstore does not also cover.
Only in Sigstore
- Fulcio
- Rekor
- Keyless signing
- Multi-language clients
- Timestamp authority
- Neutral governance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Octopus Deploy
- Automating software deployments across development, testing, productionnot Sigstore
- Automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident responsenot Sigstore
- Managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configurationnot Sigstore
- Tracking DORA metrics and enforcing deployment approval gatesnot Sigstore
Sigstore
- Open source projects signing releases without running a certificate authoritynot Octopus Deploy
- Organisations meeting a signed-artifact requirement without buying a signing productnot Octopus Deploy
- Publishing provenance that a consumer can verify independently of younot Octopus Deploy
- Self-hosting the same components where a public log is unacceptablenot Octopus Deploy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Octopus Deploy
- Free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space
- Annual billing is the only option for both Octopus Cloud and Octopus Server; there is no monthly plan
- Professional cloud tier is $4,330 per year and Enterprise cloud is $24,600 per year, with tenants and machines sold as add-ons beyond the free allotment
Sigstore
- The security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.
- It is a 99.5 percent objective with no service level agreement, which permits several hours of downtime a month and offers no remedy. A pipeline that signs on every build has taken a hard dependency on a free service with no contract behind it.
- Log scale is a live engineering problem rather than a theoretical one. The active shard holds billions of entries, the log has already been sharded twice, and sharding version 1 requires stopping traffic, which is why a replacement was built.
- Ten-minute certificates make trust depend on log availability. Verifying an older signature relies on the log entry proving it was made inside that window, so a lost or unreachable entry can render a valid artifact unverifiable.
- Migration debt is substantial and ongoing. Version 2 of the log is generally available but not the public default, the signing client has an announced breaking release ahead, some official clients lag the new log format, and a post-quantum migration is named as the next break after that.
Pricing, plan by plan
Octopus Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 10 projects
- 10 tenants
- 10 machines
- Professional (Cloud)$4330/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Professional (Server)$2080/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Enterprise (Cloud)$24600/year
- 100+ projects supported
- Unlimited spaces and users
- 20 concurrent tasks
Sigstore
Free- Public good instanceFree
- Free to everyone with no contract
- 99.5 percent availability objective, not an agreement
- 100KB cap per attestation upload
- Self-hostedFree
- Apache-2.0
- Run your own Fulcio and Rekor
- Rekor v2 available for self-hosters
Which should you pick?
Choose Sigstore if
- You need fulcio.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want rekor.
Questions people ask
- Is Octopus Deploy or Sigstore better?
- Neither clearly leads. Octopus Deploy starts at Free and Sigstore at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Octopus Deploy or Sigstore?
- Octopus Deploy starts at Free and Sigstore at Free.
- Does Octopus Deploy or Sigstore run on more platforms?
- Octopus Deploy runs on Web. Sigstore runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Octopus Deploy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Octopus Deploy best used for?
- Octopus Deploy is most often used for automating software deployments across development, testing, production, automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident response, managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configuration, tracking dora metrics and enforcing deployment approval gates. Of those, automating software deployments across development, testing, production and automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident response are not what Sigstore is typically brought in for.
- What can Octopus Deploy do that Sigstore cannot?
- Sigstore covers Fulcio, Rekor, Keyless signing, Multi-language clients.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Octopus Deploy: How much does Octopus Deploy cost?
Octopus Deploy offers a free tier at $0/year with limits on projects (10), users (10), and tenants (10). Professional plans start at $2,080/year for self-hosted or $4,330/year for cloud hosting.
SourceSigstore: Is the public instance really free?
Yes, with no contract and no paid tier. That is also the weakness: a 99.5 percent objective with no agreement, no remedy and support through Slack.
Octopus Deploy: What does the free Octopus Deploy tier include?
The free tier includes 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks, 1TB file storage, 100GB database storage, and community support only.
SourceSigstore: Has the public log moved to Rekor v2?
No. Version 2 reached general availability in October 2025 and self-hosters can use it, but the public instance still defaults to version 1 and the project has said it will for the foreseeable future.
Octopus Deploy: Can I try Octopus Deploy for free before purchasing?
Yes, a free tier is available with unlimited duration but capped usage, plus a 30-day free trial with full Enterprise features is offered to evaluate the platform.
SourceSigstore: Does Sigstore make my dependencies safe?
No, and this is a category error worth avoiding. It tells you who published something. It has no knowledge of what the artifact contains or whether it is vulnerable.
Octopus Deploy: What are the Enterprise pricing differences between Cloud and Server hosting?
Enterprise Cloud hosting costs $24,600/year and includes 20 concurrent tasks and 24/7 support. Enterprise Server self-hosted costs $15,600/year with flexible concurrent task configuration and 24/7 support.
SourceSigstore: What are the rate limits?
Not published. Only the 100KB cap per attestation upload is documented, so do not design a high-volume pipeline around assumed throughput.
Sigstore: Should we self-host it?
If a public record of every signature is unacceptable, or if a free service with no agreement cannot sit in your build path, then yes. Otherwise the public instance is what most projects use.
Related pages
More on Octopus Deploy
Other head to heads
- Octopus Deploy vs Visual Studio Code
- Octopus Deploy vs ESLint
- Octopus Deploy vs pnpm
- Octopus Deploy vs Turborepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Harness
- Octopus Deploy vs HCP Terraform
- Octopus Deploy vs Earthly
- Octopus Deploy vs Moonrepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Ansible
- Octopus Deploy vs Argo CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Garden
- Octopus Deploy vs GitLab CI/CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Frappe
- Octopus Deploy vs Git
- Octopus Deploy vs GoLand
- Octopus Deploy vs Hookdeck
- Octopus Deploy vs JFrog Artifactory
- Octopus Deploy vs Namespace
- Octopus Deploy vs Cosign
- Octopus Deploy vs Syft
- Octopus Deploy vs Logto
- Octopus Deploy vs Infisical
- Octopus Deploy vs Chainguard
- Octopus Deploy vs Ory
- Octopus Deploy vs OWASP ZAP
- Octopus Deploy vs Bitwarden
- Octopus Deploy vs Semgrep
- Octopus Deploy vs Trivy
- Octopus Deploy vs authentik
- Octopus Deploy vs Authelia
- Octopus Deploy vs Resolver
- Octopus Deploy vs Saviynt
- Octopus Deploy vs Securiti
- Octopus Deploy vs Speakeasy
- Octopus Deploy vs Sysdig
- Octopus Deploy vs Tenable
- Sigstore vs Visual Studio Code
- Sigstore vs ESLint
- Sigstore vs pnpm
- Sigstore vs Turborepo
- Sigstore vs Harness
- Sigstore vs HCP Terraform
- Sigstore vs Earthly
- Sigstore vs Moonrepo
- Sigstore vs Ansible
- Sigstore vs Argo CD
- Sigstore vs Garden
- Sigstore vs GitLab CI/CD
- Sigstore vs Frappe
- Sigstore vs Git
- Sigstore vs GoLand
- Sigstore vs Hookdeck
- Sigstore vs JFrog Artifactory
- Sigstore vs Namespace
- Sigstore vs Cosign
- Sigstore vs Syft
- Sigstore vs Logto
- Sigstore vs Infisical
- Sigstore vs Chainguard
- Sigstore vs Ory
- Sigstore vs OWASP ZAP
- Sigstore vs Bitwarden
- Sigstore vs Semgrep
- Sigstore vs Trivy
- Sigstore vs authentik
- Sigstore vs Authelia
- Sigstore vs Resolver
- Sigstore vs Saviynt
- Sigstore vs Securiti
- Sigstore vs Speakeasy
- Sigstore vs Sysdig
- Sigstore vs Tenable
