Developer Tools · head to head
Octopus Deploy vs Saviynt

Octopus Deploy
Developer Tools
Continuous delivery and runbook automation for releases
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Saviynt
Cybersecurity
Cloud identity governance with privileged access in the same platform
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Octopus Deploy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Octopus Deploy free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space; Saviynt implementation typically runs a year or more with a partner, and the cost of that work regularly exceeds the first year subscription, which is rarely in the initial business case.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Octopus Deploy and Saviynt actually diverge.
| Attribute | Octopus Deploy | Saviynt |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Octopus Deploy
Nothing recorded that Saviynt does not also cover.
Only in Saviynt
- Identity governance
- Access certification
- Segregation of duties
- Privileged access
- Cloud entitlements
- Third party access
- Access request
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Octopus Deploy
- Automating software deployments across development, testing, productionnot Saviynt
- Automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident responsenot Saviynt
- Managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configurationnot Saviynt
- Tracking DORA metrics and enforcing deployment approval gatesnot Saviynt
Saviynt
- An enterprise with an audit finding that privileged administrative accounts are excluded from access reviewsnot Octopus Deploy
- A healthcare system governing clinician access to Epic alongside corporate applications in one certification campaignnot Octopus Deploy
- A company that has to prove segregation of duties in SAP to an external auditor every yearnot Octopus Deploy
- A federal contractor needing an identity governance service with FedRAMP authorisationnot Octopus Deploy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Octopus Deploy
- Free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space
- Annual billing is the only option for both Octopus Cloud and Octopus Server; there is no monthly plan
- Professional cloud tier is $4,330 per year and Enterprise cloud is $24,600 per year, with tenants and machines sold as add-ons beyond the free allotment
Saviynt
- Implementation typically runs a year or more with a partner, and the cost of that work regularly exceeds the first year subscription, which is rarely in the initial business case.
- Governance quality is limited by HR and application data quality, so organisations with inconsistent joiner records spend the early phases correcting source data rather than certifying access.
- Pricing is per governed identity, so counting contractors, service accounts and non-employee identities materially changes the bill and the definition is worth negotiating explicitly.
- The privileged access module is younger than the governance core and is not a full substitute for a dedicated PAM product in estates with heavy session recording or credential rotation requirements.
- Connectors to less common applications require custom development, and each one adds a maintenance burden that reappears every time the target application changes its API.
Pricing, plan by plan
Octopus Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 10 projects
- 10 tenants
- 10 machines
- Professional (Cloud)$4330/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Professional (Server)$2080/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Enterprise (Cloud)$24600/year
- 100+ projects supported
- Unlimited spaces and users
- 20 concurrent tasks
Saviynt
On request- Saviynt Identity Cloud$undefined/year
- Priced per governed identity per year
- Modules for governance, privileged access and cloud entitlements
- SaaS delivery with FedRAMP authorised offering available
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Octopus Deploy or Saviynt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Octopus Deploy starts at Free and Saviynt at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Octopus Deploy or Saviynt?
- Octopus Deploy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Octopus Deploy and On request for Saviynt.
- Does Octopus Deploy or Saviynt run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Octopus Deploy for free?
- Yes. Octopus Deploy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Saviynt starts at On request.
- What is Octopus Deploy best used for?
- Octopus Deploy is most often used for automating software deployments across development, testing, production, automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident response, managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configuration, tracking dora metrics and enforcing deployment approval gates. Of those, automating software deployments across development, testing, production and automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident response are not what Saviynt is typically brought in for.
- What can Octopus Deploy do that Saviynt cannot?
- Saviynt covers Identity governance, Access certification, Segregation of duties, Privileged access.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Octopus Deploy: How much does Octopus Deploy cost?
Octopus Deploy offers a free tier at $0/year with limits on projects (10), users (10), and tenants (10). Professional plans start at $2,080/year for self-hosted or $4,330/year for cloud hosting.
SourceSaviynt: Does Saviynt replace a PAM vendor?
It can for time-bound privileged access, but organisations with heavy session recording, credential rotation or legacy server access requirements often keep a dedicated PAM product alongside it.
Octopus Deploy: What does the free Octopus Deploy tier include?
The free tier includes 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks, 1TB file storage, 100GB database storage, and community support only.
SourceSaviynt: Is there a FedRAMP authorised version?
Yes, Saviynt offers a FedRAMP authorised government cloud offering, which matters where that is an eligibility requirement rather than a preference.
Octopus Deploy: Can I try Octopus Deploy for free before purchasing?
Yes, a free tier is available with unlimited duration but capped usage, plus a 30-day free trial with full Enterprise features is offered to evaluate the platform.
SourceSaviynt: How is it priced?
Per governed identity per year, quoted. Define carefully whether service accounts and contractors count toward the identity total.
Octopus Deploy: What are the Enterprise pricing differences between Cloud and Server hosting?
Enterprise Cloud hosting costs $24,600/year and includes 20 concurrent tasks and 24/7 support. Enterprise Server self-hosted costs $15,600/year with flexible concurrent task configuration and 24/7 support.
SourceRelated pages
More on Octopus Deploy
Other head to heads
- Octopus Deploy vs Visual Studio Code
- Octopus Deploy vs ESLint
- Octopus Deploy vs pnpm
- Octopus Deploy vs Turborepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Harness
- Octopus Deploy vs HCP Terraform
- Octopus Deploy vs Earthly
- Octopus Deploy vs Moonrepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Ansible
- Octopus Deploy vs Argo CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Garden
- Octopus Deploy vs GitLab CI/CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Frappe
- Octopus Deploy vs Git
- Octopus Deploy vs GoLand
- Octopus Deploy vs Hookdeck
- Octopus Deploy vs JFrog Artifactory
- Octopus Deploy vs Namespace
- Octopus Deploy vs One Identity
- Octopus Deploy vs Delinea
- Octopus Deploy vs Omada Identity
- Octopus Deploy vs Infisical
- Octopus Deploy vs Netwrix
- Octopus Deploy vs BeyondTrust
- Octopus Deploy vs Doppler
- Octopus Deploy vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Octopus Deploy vs Speakeasy
- Octopus Deploy vs Chainguard
- Octopus Deploy vs Fenergo
- Octopus Deploy vs Tenable
- Octopus Deploy vs Hanwha Vision
- Octopus Deploy vs Idira
- Octopus Deploy vs IVPN
- Octopus Deploy vs Logto
- Octopus Deploy vs Malwarebytes
- Octopus Deploy vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Saviynt vs Visual Studio Code
- Saviynt vs ESLint
- Saviynt vs pnpm
- Saviynt vs Turborepo
- Saviynt vs Harness
- Saviynt vs HCP Terraform
- Saviynt vs Earthly
- Saviynt vs Moonrepo
- Saviynt vs Ansible
- Saviynt vs Argo CD
- Saviynt vs Garden
- Saviynt vs GitLab CI/CD
- Saviynt vs Frappe
- Saviynt vs Git
- Saviynt vs GoLand
- Saviynt vs Hookdeck
- Saviynt vs JFrog Artifactory
- Saviynt vs Namespace
- Saviynt vs One Identity
- Saviynt vs Delinea
- Saviynt vs Omada Identity
- Saviynt vs Infisical
- Saviynt vs Netwrix
- Saviynt vs BeyondTrust
- Saviynt vs Doppler
- Saviynt vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Saviynt vs Speakeasy
- Saviynt vs Chainguard
- Saviynt vs Fenergo
- Saviynt vs Tenable
- Saviynt vs Hanwha Vision
- Saviynt vs Idira
- Saviynt vs IVPN
- Saviynt vs Logto
- Saviynt vs Malwarebytes
- Saviynt vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
