Research · head to head
Obsidian vs Umami

Obsidian
Research
A powerful knowledge base on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Umami
Marketing
Open source, cookie-free web analytics you can self-host for the cost of a database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Obsidian sync is a paid add-on at $4 per month billed annually rather than part of the app; Umami there is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- They diverge on capability: Obsidian covers Bidirectional linking, Umami covers Cookie-free tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Obsidian and Umami actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Obsidian
- Bidirectional linking
- Graph view visualization
- Markdown support
- Local file storage
- Plugin ecosystem
- Custom CSS themes
- Templates
- Search and tags
Only in Umami
- Cookie-free tracking
- Self-hosting
- Small tracking script
- Custom events
- Funnels and goals
- Multi-site and teams
- Public dashboards
- API access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Obsidian
- Local-first markdown note taking with no account requirednot Umami
- Linking notes into a personal knowledge graphnot Umami
- Syncing a vault across devices with end-to-end encryption on the paid add-onnot Umami
- Publishing a public site from a vaultnot Umami
- Extending the editor with community pluginsnot Umami
Umami
- A developer who wants traffic numbers on a personal or client site without adding a consent bannernot Obsidian
- An organisation whose legal or procurement team has ruled out sending visitor data to a US advertising companynot Obsidian
- A high-traffic site where hosted analytics priced by pageview band has become expensive and self-hosting removes the ceiling entirelynot Obsidian
- A team that wants analytics data in a database they already control so they can query and join it themselvesnot Obsidian
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Obsidian
- Sync is a paid add-on at $4 per month billed annually rather than part of the app
- Publishing to the web is a further $8 per month per site
- Commercial use asks for a $50 per user per year licence, though the vendor states it is not required
- Collaboration is limited compared with a hosted notes tool, since the vault is local files first
Umami
- There is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- Self-hosting is only free in licence terms; you own the database, the upgrades, the backups and the query performance at scale, and a busy site's events table grows quickly enough to need real attention.
- Because it stores no persistent identifier, it cannot follow a user across devices or sessions in any meaningful way, which makes returning-visitor and lifetime-value questions unanswerable by design rather than by omission.
- Cloud overage is billed per event beyond the plan allowance, so a traffic spike or a badly instrumented custom event can produce a bill materially above the $20 or $200 headline before anyone notices.
- It is maintained by a small team, so the pace of new capability is modest and enterprise expectations such as SSO, granular role permissions and formal support agreements are limited compared with commercial analytics vendors.
Pricing, plan by plan
Obsidian
Free- Obsidian Sync$4/month
- Sync notes across devices
- Obsidian Publish$8/month
- Turn notes into a website
Umami
Free- Self-hostedFree
- MIT licensed, no licence fee
- No event limit imposed by the software
- Unlimited websites and users
- Cloud HobbyFree
- Up to 100,000 events per month
- 3 websites
- 6 months data retention
- Cloud Pro$20/month
- Up to 1,000,000 events per month
- Unlimited websites
- Unlimited team members
- Cloud Business$200/month
- Up to 10,000,000 events per month
- All Pro features
- Higher volume overage rate
Which should you pick?
Choose Obsidian if
- You need bidirectional linking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want graph view visualization.
Choose Umami if
- You need cookie-free tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want self-hosting.
Questions people ask
- Is Obsidian or Umami better?
- Neither clearly leads. Obsidian starts at Free and Umami at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Obsidian or Umami?
- Obsidian starts at Free and Umami at Free.
- Does Obsidian or Umami run on more platforms?
- Obsidian runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android. Umami runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Obsidian for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Obsidian best used for?
- Obsidian is most often used for local-first markdown note taking with no account required, linking notes into a personal knowledge graph, syncing a vault across devices with end-to-end encryption on the paid add-on, publishing a public site from a vault. Of those, local-first markdown note taking with no account required and linking notes into a personal knowledge graph are not what Umami is typically brought in for.
- What can Obsidian do that Umami cannot?
- Obsidian covers Bidirectional linking, Graph view visualization, Markdown support, Local file storage. Umami covers Cookie-free tracking, Self-hosting, Small tracking script, Custom events.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Obsidian: Is Obsidian free?
Yes. The core Obsidian application is 100% free for personal and commercial use with no limitations. You can use unlimited vaults and every core feature without payment.
SourceUmami: Is Umami really free?
Self-hosted, yes; it is MIT licensed with no event cap. You pay for the server and database. Umami Cloud has a free tier at 100,000 events a month and paid tiers from $20.
Obsidian: What file format does Obsidian use?
Obsidian stores every note as a plain Markdown file. Because it uses standard Markdown instead of a proprietary format, your notes remain portable and can be edited with many other Markdown editors.
SourceUmami: Do I need a cookie consent banner?
For Umami analytics specifically, generally no, because it sets no cookies and stores no personal data. Other tags on your site may still require one.
Obsidian: Can I collaborate with others in Obsidian?
The core application does not include built-in team collaboration features. However, Obsidian offers optional add-ons and can be used with version control systems or cloud storage for collaboration.
SourceUmami: Can it replace Google Analytics?
For traffic, referrers and event counts, yes. For attribution modelling, audiences and advertising integration, no.
Umami: What does it need to run?
A container and a PostgreSQL or MySQL database. Most people deploy it on infrastructure they already pay for.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Obsidian vs Roam Research
- Obsidian vs Elicit
- Obsidian vs Mendeley
- Obsidian vs NVivo
- Obsidian vs Paperpile
- Obsidian vs Zotero
- Obsidian vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Obsidian vs SurveyMonkey
- Obsidian vs Aurelius
- Obsidian vs Benchling
- Obsidian vs LabVantage
- Obsidian vs Sapio Sciences
- Obsidian vs Castor EDC
- Obsidian vs Chemaxon
- Obsidian vs Condens
- Obsidian vs DNAnexus
- Obsidian vs Dotmatics
- Obsidian vs Matomo
- Obsidian vs Plausible
- Obsidian vs Fathom Analytics
- Obsidian vs Mautic
- Obsidian vs Countly
- Obsidian vs Freshpaint
- Obsidian vs Simple Analytics
- Obsidian vs Attribution
- Obsidian vs CallRail
- Obsidian vs Microsoft Clarity
- Obsidian vs Octoboard
- Obsidian vs Onclusive
- Obsidian vs WebEngage
- Obsidian vs Woopra
- Obsidian vs Wunderkind
- Obsidian vs Typeform
- Obsidian vs MoEngage
- Obsidian vs Optimizely
- Umami vs Roam Research
- Umami vs Elicit
- Umami vs Mendeley
- Umami vs NVivo
- Umami vs Paperpile
- Umami vs Zotero
- Umami vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Umami vs SurveyMonkey
- Umami vs Aurelius
- Umami vs Benchling
- Umami vs LabVantage
- Umami vs Sapio Sciences
- Umami vs Castor EDC
- Umami vs Chemaxon
- Umami vs Condens
- Umami vs DNAnexus
- Umami vs Dotmatics
- Umami vs Matomo
- Umami vs Plausible
- Umami vs Fathom Analytics
- Umami vs Mautic
- Umami vs Countly
- Umami vs Freshpaint
- Umami vs Simple Analytics
- Umami vs Attribution
- Umami vs CallRail
- Umami vs Microsoft Clarity
- Umami vs Octoboard
- Umami vs Onclusive
- Umami vs WebEngage
- Umami vs Woopra
- Umami vs Wunderkind
- Umami vs Typeform
- Umami vs MoEngage
- Umami vs Optimizely
