Energy · head to head
Helioscope vs Novity

Novity
Energy
Hybrid physics and machine learning prognostics that estimate remaining useful life for process equipment
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Helioscope licences are single user, so each designer needs their own; Novity novity is a small venture-backed company with a strategic investor rather than a profitable business, so continuity risk is real and the Tokyo Gas investment signals a likely eventual acquisition that would reset the roadmap.
- They diverge on capability: Helioscope covers PV system design, Novity covers TruPrognostics engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Helioscope and Novity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Helioscope | Novity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $159/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web, Cloud |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Helioscope
- PV system design
- 3D shade modeling
- Performance simulation
- Single-line diagrams
- BOM generation
- Proposal templates
- Component database
- Financial modeling
Only in Novity
- TruPrognostics engine
- Cold-start modelling
- Fault mode diagnosis
- Remaining useful life
- Existing sensor reuse
- Recommended actions
- Historian connectors
- Asset class libraries
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Helioscope
- Solar project design and modelingnot Novity
- Rooftop, carport, and ground-mount solar system planningnot Novity
- Financial analysis and sales proposal generation for solar installationsnot Novity
Novity
- A gas processing plant that needs a defensible time-to-failure number before deferring a turnaroundnot Helioscope
- An LNG terminal with critical compressors and no run-to-failure history to train a conventional modelnot Helioscope
- A wastewater operator whose existing vibration alarms are ignored because they carry no severity or horizonnot Helioscope
- A generator operator supplying data centre load where an unplanned trip carries contractual penaltiesnot Helioscope
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Helioscope
- Licences are single user, so each designer needs their own
- Projects are capped at 10 a month on both Basic and Pro
- System size is capped by plan, at 1.25 MW DC on Basic and 5 MW on Pro, so a larger array forces an upgrade regardless of project count
- Trackers, LIDAR modelling and API access sit on the higher tiers
- Enterprise is priced per project with no published figure
Novity
- Novity is a small venture-backed company with a strategic investor rather than a profitable business, so continuity risk is real and the Tokyo Gas investment signals a likely eventual acquisition that would reset the roadmap.
- Physics-based models must be configured per equipment class, so each new asset type is an engineering engagement rather than a configuration screen, and rollout speed is limited by Novitys own capacity.
- Prognostics depend on the quality and sampling rate of your historian data; plants recording ten-minute averages will not get useful remaining-useful-life estimates without new instrumentation.
- Nothing about pricing is published and there is no self-service entry point, so evaluation always starts with a sales-led pilot on a handful of assets.
- The deployment footprint is concentrated in oil and gas, LNG and water, so reference customers and pre-built asset models outside those industries are limited.
Pricing, plan by plan
Helioscope
$159/month- Basic$159/month
- 1 user per license
- 10 projects per month (120 per year)
- 15% discount for annual billing ($1,620/year)
- Pro$259/month
- 1 user per license
- 10 projects per month (120 per year)
- 15% discount for annual billing ($2,640/year)
- Enterprise$null/month
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited projects
- Custom pricing
Novity
On request- TruPrognostics$undefined/year
- Quoted per asset class and monitored equipment count
- Model configuration and commissioning quoted as a project
- Typically an annual subscription tied to a pilot then a rollout
Which should you pick?
Choose Helioscope if
- You need pv system design.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want 3d shade modeling.
Choose Novity if
- You need truprognostics engine.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want cold-start modelling.
Questions people ask
- Is Helioscope or Novity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Helioscope starts at $159/month and Novity at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Helioscope or Novity?
- Helioscope starts at $159/month and Novity at On request.
- Does Helioscope or Novity run on more platforms?
- Helioscope runs on Web, Api. Novity runs on Web, Cloud.
- What is Helioscope best used for?
- Helioscope is most often used for solar project design and modeling, rooftop, carport, and ground-mount solar system planning, financial analysis and sales proposal generation for solar installations. Of those, solar project design and modeling and rooftop, carport, and ground-mount solar system planning are not what Novity is typically brought in for.
- What can Helioscope do that Novity cannot?
- Helioscope covers PV system design, 3D shade modeling, Performance simulation, Single-line diagrams. Novity covers TruPrognostics engine, Cold-start modelling, Fault mode diagnosis, Remaining useful life.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Helioscope: What is the starting price for HelioScope?
HelioScope Basic plan costs $159 per month per license with annual billing at $1,620/year (15% discount). The Pro plan is $259/month or $2,640/year. Each license covers 1 user. Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceNovity: What does Novity actually output?
A named failure mode and an estimated remaining useful life with a confidence band, not just an anomaly alert.
Helioscope: How many projects can I design monthly with HelioScope Basic and Pro?
Both Basic and Pro plans include 10 projects per month, equaling 120 projects per year. The project allocation is the same across both tiers; the difference is in design capability (1.25 MW for Basic vs. 5 MW for Pro). Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceNovity: Do we need failure history to train it?
No. The physics component is what lets it produce useful prognostics on equipment with little or no run-to-failure data.
Helioscope: What is the maximum solar design capacity by HelioScope tier?
HelioScope Basic supports designs up to 1.25 MW DC, Pro supports up to 5 MW DC, and Enterprise supports unlimited designs up to 30 MW DC. Accuracy within 1% of PVsyst modeling is maintained across tiers. Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceNovity: Do we need new sensors?
Often not. It reads from your existing historian, but low sampling rates or missing measurements can require additional instrumentation.
Novity: Who backs the company?
It was spun out of Xerox PARC and took a strategic investment from Acario Innovation, the venture arm of Tokyo Gas, in 2026.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Helioscope vs Aurora Solar
- Helioscope vs Enphase Enlighten
- Helioscope vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Helioscope vs ABB Ability
- Helioscope vs SolarWinds
- Helioscope vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- Helioscope vs Enerex
- Helioscope vs Stem Athena
- Helioscope vs AutoGrid Flex
- Helioscope vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Helioscope vs GE Digital GridOS
- Helioscope vs SMA Energy
- Helioscope vs Influx Energy Management
- Helioscope vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- Helioscope vs OpenLink Endur
- Helioscope vs Oracle Utilities
- Helioscope vs Petrel E&P Software
- Helioscope vs Siemens EnergyIP
- Helioscope vs AVEVA PI System
- Helioscope vs Cognite Data Fusion
- Helioscope vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- Helioscope vs Bently Nevada System 1
- Helioscope vs Emerson Ovation
- Helioscope vs Wood Mackenzie Lens
- Helioscope vs Schneider Electric EcoStruxure
- Helioscope vs Enverus Energy Analytics
- Helioscope vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- Helioscope vs OSIsoft PI System
- Helioscope vs Azelio Energy Storage
- Novity vs Aurora Solar
- Novity vs Enphase Enlighten
- Novity vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Novity vs ABB Ability
- Novity vs SolarWinds
- Novity vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- Novity vs Enerex
- Novity vs Stem Athena
- Novity vs AutoGrid Flex
- Novity vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Novity vs GE Digital GridOS
- Novity vs SMA Energy
- Novity vs Influx Energy Management
- Novity vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- Novity vs OpenLink Endur
- Novity vs Oracle Utilities
- Novity vs Petrel E&P Software
- Novity vs Siemens EnergyIP
- Novity vs AVEVA PI System
- Novity vs Cognite Data Fusion
- Novity vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- Novity vs Bently Nevada System 1
- Novity vs Emerson Ovation
- Novity vs Wood Mackenzie Lens
- Novity vs Schneider Electric EcoStruxure
- Novity vs Enverus Energy Analytics
- Novity vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- Novity vs OSIsoft PI System
- Novity vs Azelio Energy Storage

