Healthcare · head to head
Nookal vs VisionVPM
Nookal
Healthcare
Australian allied health practice management priced per practitioner with usage charges on top
- From
- 49/month
- Rated
- -
VisionVPM
Veterinary
On-premise practice management for veterinary groups in Australia, New Zealand, the UK and Ireland
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Nookal the features most multi-practitioner clinics need, including advanced reporting, custom forms and automated recalls, are held back to the Professional tier, so the AUD 49 entry price is not a realistic budget for anything beyond a solo practice.; VisionVPM it needs a Windows server, a backup regime and someone responsible for both, so the true cost includes IT support that cloud competitors absorb into their subscription.
- They diverge on capability: Nookal covers Per practitioner pricing, VisionVPM covers Local database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Nookal and VisionVPM actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Nookal
- Per practitioner pricing
- Clinical notes
- Online booking
- Automated recalls
- KPI dashboards
- Claiming
- Patient portal
- AI and voice
Only in VisionVPM
- Local database
- Large and mixed animal modules
- Stock and wholesale ordering
- Debtor and account management
- Multi-site consolidation
- Clinical reminders
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Nookal
- A three to ten practitioner physiotherapy clinic in Australia that wants Medicare claiming and published pricing rather than a quote processnot VisionVPM
- A New Zealand practice that needs ACC claim submission integrated with its clinical notes and billingnot VisionVPM
- A chiropractic group opening a second location that wants shared patient records and one reporting view across sitesnot VisionVPM
- A UK or Irish allied health clinic that wants an Australian-style clinical workflow with GBP or EUR billingnot VisionVPM
VisionVPM
- A rural mixed practice where internet connectivity is too unreliable to depend on a browser-only systemnot Nookal
- A corporate group that requires clinical and financial data to remain on infrastructure it controlsnot Nookal
- A farm-heavy practice needing herd recording and monthly account billing that companion-animal cloud systems handle poorlynot Nookal
- An established VisionVPM site weighing an upgrade against the cost and disruption of migrating to a cloud systemnot Nookal
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Nookal
- The features most multi-practitioner clinics need, including advanced reporting, custom forms and automated recalls, are held back to the Professional tier, so the AUD 49 entry price is not a realistic budget for anything beyond a solo practice.
- Add-ons stack quickly: AI and voice at about USD 25 per active licence, the patient portal from USD 10 per location and secure messaging from USD 1.50 per user can push a seat close to double its list price.
- Pricing is not a simple currency conversion, with the USD Essentials tier at 65 and Professional at 89 against AUD 49 and 59, so overseas clinics pay a meaningful premium for the same software.
- Messaging and claiming are metered per SMS and per claim, so a clinic that leans on reminders to control no-shows finds a variable line item that grows with appointment volume and is easy to underestimate at purchase.
- Single sign-on is quoted rather than listed and sits with the Enterprise tier, which puts basic identity governance out of reach for mid-sized groups that would otherwise stay on Professional.
VisionVPM
- It needs a Windows server, a backup regime and someone responsible for both, so the true cost includes IT support that cloud competitors absorb into their subscription.
- Upgrades are scheduled events with downtime rather than transparent releases, which means version drift across a multi-site group and a coordination burden at each release.
- Covetrus is steering customers towards its cloud product, so development effort is unlikely to favour VisionVPM long term and buyers should assume a migration eventually.
- Remote and out-of-hours access requires a remote desktop or Citrix layer, which adds licensing, latency and another system to secure.
- Ordering and prescription workflows are built around Covetrus as the supplier, so a practice buying from other wholesalers loses the automated parts and reverts to manual entry.
Pricing, plan by plan
Nookal
49/month- Essentials$49/month
- Per practitioner per month
- Appointments, patient records and invoicing
- Online booking
- Professional$59/month
- Per practitioner per month
- Advanced reporting and KPI dashboards
- Custom forms
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Quoted pricing
- Multi-account management
- Dedicated support
VisionVPM
On request- VisionVPM$undefined/year
- Licence and annual support quoted per practice
- Server hardware and Windows licences bought separately
- Data migration quoted per site
Which should you pick?
Choose Nookal if
- You need per practitioner pricing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want clinical notes.
Choose VisionVPM if
- You need local database.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want large and mixed animal modules.
Questions people ask
- Is Nookal or VisionVPM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Nookal starts at 49/month and VisionVPM at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Nookal or VisionVPM?
- Nookal starts at 49/month and VisionVPM at On request.
- Does Nookal or VisionVPM run on more platforms?
- Nookal runs on Web, iOS, Android. VisionVPM runs on Windows.
- What is Nookal best used for?
- Nookal is most often used for a three to ten practitioner physiotherapy clinic in australia that wants medicare claiming and published pricing rather than a quote process, a new zealand practice that needs acc claim submission integrated with its clinical notes and billing, a chiropractic group opening a second location that wants shared patient records and one reporting view across sites, a uk or irish allied health clinic that wants an australian-style clinical workflow with gbp or eur billing. Of those, a three to ten practitioner physiotherapy clinic in australia that wants medicare claiming and published pricing rather than a quote process and a new zealand practice that needs acc claim submission integrated with its clinical notes and billing are not what VisionVPM is typically brought in for.
- What can Nookal do that VisionVPM cannot?
- Nookal covers Per practitioner pricing, Clinical notes, Online booking, Automated recalls. VisionVPM covers Local database, Large and mixed animal modules, Stock and wholesale ordering, Debtor and account management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Nookal: How much does Nookal cost per practitioner?
Essentials is AUD 49 per practitioner per month and Professional is AUD 59, with published equivalents of GBP 29 and 39, EUR 65 and 89, and USD 65 and 89. Enterprise is quoted.
VisionVPM: Can VisionVPM run in the cloud?
Only by hosting the Windows server yourself or through a partner and connecting over remote desktop. It is not a browser application and hosting it does not make it one.
Nookal: What is not included in the subscription?
SMS from about 7 cents per message, Medicare claims from about 10 cents, ACC claims at about 12 cents, the patient portal, secure messaging, AI and voice, and single sign-on are all charged separately.
VisionVPM: Is VisionVPM still being developed?
It receives maintenance and compliance updates, but its owner sells a separate cloud product and directs new development there. Plan on a migration within the life of your next server.
Nookal: Is there a contract?
No lock-in contract, and the free trial does not require a credit card.
VisionVPM: Does it work outside Australasia and the UK?
It is sold and supported in Australia, New Zealand, the UK and Ireland. Tax handling and supplier integrations are built for those markets.
Nookal: Which countries does the claiming work in?
Medicare claiming is Australian and ACC claiming is New Zealand. Elsewhere the software works but you invoice and reconcile manually.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Nookal vs Jane App
- Nookal vs SimplePractice
- Nookal vs Cliniko
- Nookal vs Zanda Health
- Nookal vs Halaxy
- Nookal vs ChiroTouch
- Nookal vs TheraNest
- Nookal vs Dentrix
- Nookal vs Doctolib
- Nookal vs Open Dental
- Nookal vs Athenahealth
- Nookal vs DrChrono
- Nookal vs Medscape
- Nookal vs Meru Health
- Nookal vs NextGen Healthcare
- Nookal vs Oracle Clinical One
- Nookal vs Phreesia
- Nookal vs ezyVet
- Nookal vs IDEXX Cornerstone
- Nookal vs Animana
- Nookal vs Onward Vet
- Nookal vs VIA Veterinary
- Nookal vs Vetstoria
- Nookal vs PetDesk
- Nookal vs Provet Cloud
- Nookal vs Shepherd
- Nookal vs Digitail
- Nookal vs Talkatoo
- Nookal vs VetBadger
- Nookal vs IDEXX Neo
- Nookal vs Vet Radar
- VisionVPM vs Jane App
- VisionVPM vs SimplePractice
- VisionVPM vs Cliniko
- VisionVPM vs Zanda Health
- VisionVPM vs Halaxy
- VisionVPM vs ChiroTouch
- VisionVPM vs TheraNest
- VisionVPM vs Dentrix
- VisionVPM vs Doctolib
- VisionVPM vs Open Dental
- VisionVPM vs Athenahealth
- VisionVPM vs DrChrono
- VisionVPM vs Medscape
- VisionVPM vs Meru Health
- VisionVPM vs NextGen Healthcare
- VisionVPM vs Oracle Clinical One
- VisionVPM vs Phreesia
- VisionVPM vs ezyVet
- VisionVPM vs IDEXX Cornerstone
- VisionVPM vs Animana
- VisionVPM vs Onward Vet
- VisionVPM vs VIA Veterinary
- VisionVPM vs Vetstoria
- VisionVPM vs PetDesk
- VisionVPM vs Provet Cloud
- VisionVPM vs Shepherd
- VisionVPM vs Digitail
- VisionVPM vs Talkatoo
- VisionVPM vs VetBadger
- VisionVPM vs IDEXX Neo
- VisionVPM vs Vet Radar