Spreadsheets · head to head
NocoDB vs QuestDB

NocoDB
Spreadsheets
Open-source no-code database platform with REST and GraphQL APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

QuestDB
Databases
Fast open source time-series database for high throughput ingestion
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: NocoDB the free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage; QuestDB open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- They diverge on capability: NocoDB covers REST API, QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NocoDB and QuestDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NocoDB
- REST API
- GraphQL API
- No-code database
- Multiple SQL databases
- Webhooks
- Automation
- Cloud support
- Self-hosted support
Only in QuestDB
- High Throughput Ingestion
- SQL Support
- Time-series Optimization
- SIMD Vectorization
- Column-oriented Storage
- Built-in Web Console
- InfluxDB Line Protocol
- PostgreSQL
Both cover
- Docker support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NocoDB
- Self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet databasenot QuestDB
- Putting a spreadsheet interface over an existing Postgres or MySQL databasenot QuestDB
- Building internal tools on structured data with an APInot QuestDB
- Team bases with per-field and per-table permissions on the paid tiersnot QuestDB
QuestDB
- Time-series analytics ingesting up to 20M rows/second from IoT sensors or financial data feedsnot NocoDB
- Real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analyticsnot NocoDB
- Applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time SQL, cold Parquet archive)not NocoDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NocoDB
- The free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage
- Records are the metering unit on cloud, so Plus covers 50K and Business 300K rather than scaling by seat alone
- Row-level security, audit log retention and team hierarchy require the Scale tier
- SCIM provisioning and air-gapped deployment are Enterprise only
- The self-hosted Community edition is unlimited on records and seats but does without workflows, scripts and dashboards, which start at the paid self-hosted tiers
QuestDB
- Open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Enterprise edition pricing not published; requires contacting sales for custom quote
- Ingestion limit of 20M rows/sec platform-dependent; may not scale to extreme throughput requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
NocoDB
Free- Free (Cloud)Free
- 3 editor seats
- 10 commenter seats
- 1 GB storage
- Plus$12/month
- Unlimited seats
- 50,000 records
- 20 GB storage
- Business$24/month
- Unlimited seats
- 300,000 records
- 100 GB storage
- Scale$45/month
- Minimum 3 seats required
- 1,000,000 records
- 150 GB storage
QuestDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the QuestDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose NocoDB if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- You also want graphql api.
Choose QuestDB if
- You need high throughput ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- You also want sql support.
Questions people ask
- Is NocoDB or QuestDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. NocoDB starts at Free and QuestDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NocoDB or QuestDB?
- NocoDB starts at Free and QuestDB at Free.
- Does NocoDB or QuestDB run on more platforms?
- NocoDB runs on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker. QuestDB runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- Can I use NocoDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is NocoDB best used for?
- NocoDB is most often used for self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet database, putting a spreadsheet interface over an existing postgres or mysql database, building internal tools on structured data with an api, team bases with per-field and per-table permissions on the paid tiers. Of those, self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet database and putting a spreadsheet interface over an existing postgres or mysql database are not what QuestDB is typically brought in for.
- What can NocoDB do that QuestDB cannot?
- NocoDB covers REST API, GraphQL API, No-code database, Multiple SQL databases. QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, SQL Support, Time-series Optimization, SIMD Vectorization. Both handle Docker support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NocoDB: Is NocoDB free?
Yes, NocoDB offers a free cloud plan with 3 editor seats, 1,000 records, 1 GB storage, and 1,000 API calls per month. A free self-hosted Community edition with unlimited records and seats is also available.
SourceQuestDB: How much does QuestDB Enterprise cost?
QuestDB does not publish specific pricing for the Enterprise tier. Customers must contact QuestDB via their enterprise contact form to receive a custom quote.
SourceNocoDB: How much does NocoDB Plus cost?
NocoDB Plus costs $12 per seat per month (billed annually) or $15 per seat per month (monthly). For unlimited seats, it costs $108/month annually or $180/month monthly. Plus includes 50,000 records, 20 GB storage, and 100,000 API calls per month.
SourceQuestDB: Does QuestDB offer a free version?
Yes, QuestDB Open Source is completely free and recommended for evaluation, prototyping, and pilot projects. Enterprise features, high availability, security, and dedicated support require the paid Enterprise tier.
SourceNocoDB: What is the difference between NocoDB Plus and Business plans?
Plus ($12/seat annual) includes 50,000 records and 100,000 API calls per month. Business ($24/seat annual) includes 300,000 records, 1,000,000 API calls per month, external database connections, SAML SSO, and table/field permissions.
SourceQuestDB: What deployment options does QuestDB offer?
QuestDB offers open source deployment, Enterprise deployment, and Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) deployment. Pricing details for BYOC and Enterprise tiers are not published and require direct contact with sales.
SourceNocoDB: Can I self-host NocoDB for free?
Yes, NocoDB's Community edition is free for self-hosting. It includes unlimited records, storage, and seats, with all core features including webhooks and 6 view types.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- NocoDB vs APITable
- NocoDB vs Teable
- NocoDB vs Looker
- NocoDB vs SeaTable
- NocoDB vs Tableau
- NocoDB vs Metabase
- NocoDB vs Redash
- NocoDB vs Mathesar
- NocoDB vs Baserow
- NocoDB vs Budibase
- NocoDB vs Fibery
- NocoDB vs Apache Superset
- NocoDB vs Coefficient
- NocoDB vs Cube Software
- NocoDB vs Quadratic
- NocoDB vs Rowy
- NocoDB vs TimescaleDB
- NocoDB vs PostgreSQL
- NocoDB vs Cockroach Labs
- NocoDB vs Amazon Aurora
- NocoDB vs Airtable
- NocoDB vs Firebolt
- NocoDB vs Apache Flink
- NocoDB vs DuckDB
- NocoDB vs OpenSearch
- NocoDB vs ClickHouse
- NocoDB vs NATS
- NocoDB vs Canary Labs
- NocoDB vs Chroma
- NocoDB vs Cloudinary
- NocoDB vs Convex
- NocoDB vs Dgraph
- NocoDB vs Dragonfly
- NocoDB vs Apache Druid
- QuestDB vs APITable
- QuestDB vs Teable
- QuestDB vs Looker
- QuestDB vs SeaTable
- QuestDB vs Tableau
- QuestDB vs Metabase
- QuestDB vs Redash
- QuestDB vs Mathesar
- QuestDB vs Baserow
- QuestDB vs Budibase
- QuestDB vs Fibery
- QuestDB vs Apache Superset
- QuestDB vs Coefficient
- QuestDB vs Cube Software
- QuestDB vs Quadratic
- QuestDB vs Rowy
- QuestDB vs TimescaleDB
- QuestDB vs PostgreSQL
- QuestDB vs Cockroach Labs
- QuestDB vs Amazon Aurora
- QuestDB vs Airtable
- QuestDB vs Firebolt
- QuestDB vs Apache Flink
- QuestDB vs DuckDB
- QuestDB vs OpenSearch
- QuestDB vs ClickHouse
- QuestDB vs NATS
- QuestDB vs Canary Labs
- QuestDB vs Chroma
- QuestDB vs Cloudinary
- QuestDB vs Convex
- QuestDB vs Dgraph
- QuestDB vs Dragonfly
- QuestDB vs Apache Druid
