Spreadsheets · head to head
NocoDB vs Quadratic

NocoDB
Spreadsheets
Open-source no-code database platform with REST and GraphQL APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Quadratic
Spreadsheets
Infinite-canvas spreadsheet that runs Python, SQL and formulas in the same grid
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: NocoDB the free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage; Quadratic aI usage is metered as a dollar allowance rather than a flat entitlement, so a team that adopts the agent enthusiastically will exhaust 20 USD per user per month quickly and the true cost per seat becomes unpredictable.
- They diverge on capability: NocoDB covers REST API, Quadratic covers Multi-language cells.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NocoDB and Quadratic actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Spreadsheets).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NocoDB
- REST API
- GraphQL API
- No-code database
- Multiple SQL databases
- Webhooks
- Automation
- Cloud support
- Self-hosted support
Only in Quadratic
- Multi-language cells
- Infinite canvas
- Direct database connections
- AI agent in the sheet
- WebAssembly engine
- Python package support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NocoDB
- Self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet databasenot Quadratic
- Putting a spreadsheet interface over an existing Postgres or MySQL databasenot Quadratic
- Building internal tools on structured data with an APInot Quadratic
- Team bases with per-field and per-table permissions on the paid tiersnot Quadratic
Quadratic
- An analyst who wants a SQL result, a Python transformation and a set of manual assumptions visible in one file instead of three toolsnot NocoDB
- Ad hoc modelling where part of the logic is genuinely code and part is a judgement call typed into a cellnot NocoDB
- Sharing a reproducible analysis with a colleague who will only ever open a spreadsheet, not a notebooknot NocoDB
- Prototyping a data pull against a warehouse before committing it to a scheduled pipelinenot NocoDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NocoDB
- The free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage
- Records are the metering unit on cloud, so Plus covers 50K and Business 300K rather than scaling by seat alone
- Row-level security, audit log retention and team hierarchy require the Scale tier
- SCIM provisioning and air-gapped deployment are Enterprise only
- The self-hosted Community edition is unlimited on records and seats but does without workflows, scripts and dashboards, which start at the paid self-hosted tiers
Quadratic
- AI usage is metered as a dollar allowance rather than a flat entitlement, so a team that adopts the agent enthusiastically will exhaust 20 USD per user per month quickly and the true cost per seat becomes unpredictable.
- Self-hosting is available only on the Enterprise plan, so an organisation that cannot send data to the vendor cloud has to enter a sales negotiation rather than run a container.
- Excel and Google Sheets compatibility is partial, so files with heavy conditional formatting, pivot tables or macros do not survive a round trip and have to be rebuilt.
- The product is young and the connector list is short, covering the main relational databases and two warehouses, so anything else has to be reached through Python code you write and maintain yourself.
- There is no real mobile editing experience, which matters more than it sounds for a spreadsheet because approvals and quick checks routinely happen on a phone.
Pricing, plan by plan
NocoDB
Free- Free (Cloud)Free
- 3 editor seats
- 10 commenter seats
- 1 GB storage
- Plus$12/month
- Unlimited seats
- 50,000 records
- 20 GB storage
- Business$24/month
- Unlimited seats
- 300,000 records
- 100 GB storage
- Scale$45/month
- Minimum 3 seats required
- 1,000,000 records
- 150 GB storage
Quadratic
Free- PersonalFree
- Limited AI usage
- Limited files and connections
- Limited sharing
- Pro$18/month
- Billed annually
- 20 USD of AI credits per month
- Unlimited files
- Business$36/month
- Billed annually
- 40 USD of AI credits per month
- Advanced permissions
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Quoted
- Self-hosting option
- Custom AI usage
Which should you pick?
Choose NocoDB if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- You also want graphql api.
Choose Quadratic if
- You need multi-language cells.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux.
- You also want infinite canvas.
Questions people ask
- Is NocoDB or Quadratic better?
- Neither clearly leads. NocoDB starts at Free and Quadratic at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NocoDB or Quadratic?
- NocoDB starts at Free and Quadratic at Free.
- Does NocoDB or Quadratic run on more platforms?
- NocoDB runs on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker. Quadratic runs on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use NocoDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is NocoDB best used for?
- NocoDB is most often used for self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet database, putting a spreadsheet interface over an existing postgres or mysql database, building internal tools on structured data with an api, team bases with per-field and per-table permissions on the paid tiers. Of those, self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet database and putting a spreadsheet interface over an existing postgres or mysql database are not what Quadratic is typically brought in for.
- What can NocoDB do that Quadratic cannot?
- NocoDB covers REST API, GraphQL API, No-code database, Multiple SQL databases. Quadratic covers Multi-language cells, Infinite canvas, Direct database connections, AI agent in the sheet.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NocoDB: Is NocoDB free?
Yes, NocoDB offers a free cloud plan with 3 editor seats, 1,000 records, 1 GB storage, and 1,000 API calls per month. A free self-hosted Community edition with unlimited records and seats is also available.
SourceQuadratic: Do I need to know Python to use it?
No, formulas work on their own, but the reason to choose Quadratic over Google Sheets is the code cells, so a team with no Python will not get the value.
NocoDB: How much does NocoDB Plus cost?
NocoDB Plus costs $12 per seat per month (billed annually) or $15 per seat per month (monthly). For unlimited seats, it costs $108/month annually or $180/month monthly. Plus includes 50,000 records, 20 GB storage, and 100,000 API calls per month.
SourceQuadratic: What happens when the AI credits run out?
Prompting stops until the next monthly reset or until you move up a plan; the spreadsheet itself keeps working normally.
NocoDB: What is the difference between NocoDB Plus and Business plans?
Plus ($12/seat annual) includes 50,000 records and 100,000 API calls per month. Business ($24/seat annual) includes 300,000 records, 1,000,000 API calls per month, external database connections, SAML SSO, and table/field permissions.
SourceQuadratic: Can it replace a BI tool?
Not for scheduled distribution or governed metrics. It is for exploratory work by one person or a small team, not for dashboards a hundred people read.
NocoDB: Can I self-host NocoDB for free?
Yes, NocoDB's Community edition is free for self-hosting. It includes unlimited records, storage, and seats, with all core features including webhooks and 6 view types.
SourceQuadratic: Is my database query sent to the vendor?
Connections run through the vendor service on all plans except Enterprise self-hosting, which is the option to take if that is unacceptable.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- NocoDB vs APITable
- NocoDB vs Teable
- NocoDB vs Looker
- NocoDB vs SeaTable
- NocoDB vs Tableau
- NocoDB vs Metabase
- NocoDB vs Redash
- NocoDB vs Mathesar
- NocoDB vs Baserow
- NocoDB vs Budibase
- NocoDB vs Fibery
- NocoDB vs Apache Superset
- NocoDB vs Coefficient
- NocoDB vs Cube Software
- NocoDB vs Rowy
- NocoDB vs Equals
- NocoDB vs Zoho Sheet
- NocoDB vs Sigma Computing
- Quadratic vs APITable
- Quadratic vs Teable
- Quadratic vs Looker
- Quadratic vs SeaTable
- Quadratic vs Tableau
- Quadratic vs Metabase
- Quadratic vs Redash
- Quadratic vs Mathesar
- Quadratic vs Baserow
- Quadratic vs Budibase
- Quadratic vs Fibery
- Quadratic vs Apache Superset
- Quadratic vs Coefficient
- Quadratic vs Cube Software
- Quadratic vs Rowy
- Quadratic vs Equals
- Quadratic vs Zoho Sheet
- Quadratic vs Sigma Computing
