Database & Data Management · head to head
Ninox vs Timescale

Timescale
Database & Data Management
PostgreSQL platform for time-series and analytical workloads
- From
- $30/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Ninox paid plans are priced per user starting around 25 euros per month, and offline desktop and mobile access is limited to the higher Business and Enterprise tiers; Timescale it is built on Postgres, so it inherits Postgres's vertical-scaling limits compared to purpose-built distributed time-series systems.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ninox and Timescale actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Database & Data Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ninox
Nothing recorded that Timescale does not also cover.
Only in Timescale
- Hypertables
- Native compression
- Continuous aggregates
- Point-in-time recovery
- Read replicas
- Private networking
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ninox
No use cases recorded yet. See the Ninox review.
Timescale
- IoT and sensor data storagenot Ninox
- Operational and infrastructure metricsnot Ninox
- Time-series analytics dashboardsnot Ninox
- Financial and market tick datanot Ninox
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ninox
- Paid plans are priced per user starting around 25 euros per month, and offline desktop and mobile access is limited to the higher Business and Enterprise tiers
Timescale
- It is built on Postgres, so it inherits Postgres's vertical-scaling limits compared to purpose-built distributed time-series systems.
- The free trial is time-limited (30 days) rather than a permanent free tier.
- Enterprise features like HIPAA compliance and cross-region backups require custom-priced Enterprise plans, not available on entry tiers.
- Multi-node horizontal scaling and read replicas are gated behind the higher-priced Scale plan.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ninox
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Ninox review.
Timescale
$30/month- Performance$30/month
- 4 database services
- Up to 8 CPU / 32GB memory per service
- Up to 16TB disk per service
- Scale$36/month
- Unlimited database services
- Up to 32 CPU / 128GB memory per service
- Up to 64TB disk per service
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Up to 64 CPU / 256GB memory per service
- Cross-region backups
- SAML SSO, HIPAA compliance
Which should you pick?
Choose Ninox if
Nothing in the data separates Ninox from Timescale on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Timescale if
- You need hypertables.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want native compression.
Questions people ask
- Is Ninox or Timescale better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ninox starts at On request and Timescale at $30/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ninox or Timescale?
- Ninox starts at On request and Timescale at $30/month.
- Does Ninox or Timescale run on more platforms?
- Ninox runs on Web. Timescale runs on web, api.
- What can Ninox do that Timescale cannot?
- Timescale covers Hypertables, Native compression, Continuous aggregates, Point-in-time recovery.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Timescale: What does Timescale (Tiger Data) cost?
Tiger Cloud starts at $30/month for the Performance plan (4 database services, up to 8 CPU/32GB RAM), $36/month for Scale (unlimited services, multi-node HA), and custom Enterprise pricing for larger deployments.
SourceTimescale: Is there a free trial and what does it include?
New users get a 30-day trial of the Performance plan with no credit card required, letting them test hypertables, compression and continuous aggregates before paying.
SourceTimescale: How is usage billed?
Billing is monthly in arrears with hourly-metered compute and storage based on average GB consumed per hour; mid-month plan changes are pro-rated and customers can cancel anytime.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Ninox vs Cockroach Labs
- Ninox vs PostgreSQL
- Ninox vs Amazon Aurora
- Ninox vs Elasticsearch
- Ninox vs PlanetScale
- Ninox vs Azure SQL
- Ninox vs ClickHouse
- Ninox vs Couchbase
- Ninox vs DuckDB
- Ninox vs DynamoDB
- Ninox vs MariaDB
- Ninox vs Oracle Database
- Ninox vs Amazon RDS
- Ninox vs Amazon Redshift
- Ninox vs Apache Druid
- Ninox vs Cassandra
- Ninox vs CouchDB
- Ninox vs DataGrip
- Timescale vs Cockroach Labs
- Timescale vs PostgreSQL
- Timescale vs Amazon Aurora
- Timescale vs Elasticsearch
- Timescale vs PlanetScale
- Timescale vs Azure SQL
- Timescale vs ClickHouse
- Timescale vs Couchbase
- Timescale vs DuckDB
- Timescale vs DynamoDB
- Timescale vs MariaDB
- Timescale vs Oracle Database
- Timescale vs Amazon RDS
- Timescale vs Amazon Redshift
- Timescale vs Apache Druid
- Timescale vs Cassandra
- Timescale vs CouchDB
- Timescale vs DataGrip
