Automation Integration · head to head
Nango vs PubNub

Nango
Automation Integration
Open source unified API and OAuth infrastructure for product integrations, licensed under Elastic License 2.0
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

PubNub
APIs
Realtime communication platform for chat, IoT, and live data apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Nango the licence is Elastic License 2.0, which is source available rather than OSI open source, and it forbids offering Nango to third parties as a managed service, so anyone planning to resell or embed it in a platform for their own customers has a genuine legal problem.; PubNub free plan storage history is limited to 7 days, which is short for apps needing longer message retention.
- They diverge on capability: Nango covers Managed OAuth, PubNub covers Pub/sub messaging.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Nango and PubNub actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Nango
- Managed OAuth
- Pre-built integrations
- Custom syncs and actions
- Incremental sync
- Rate limit and retry handling
- Webhooks
- Self-hosting
- Unified models
Only in PubNub
- Pub/sub messaging
- Presence tracking
- Message persistence
- Serverless Functions
- File sharing
- Encryption and access controls
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Nango
- A SaaS product that needs to ship twenty customer-facing integrations without hiring a team to maintain OAuth and token refresh for eachnot PubNub
- A team that needs a niche or internal API integrated, which closed unified API vendors will not build for themnot PubNub
- A company with data residency or security constraints that must self-host the integration layer rather than send customer tokens to a vendornot PubNub
- An engineering team replacing a homegrown integration service whose main cost is silent token expiry and rate limit failures in productionnot PubNub
PubNub
- Building realtime chat applicationsnot Nango
- Streaming live IoT sensor datanot Nango
- Adding presence indicators to collaborative appsnot Nango
- Running edge logic with serverless Functions on realtime eventsnot Nango
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Nango
- The licence is Elastic License 2.0, which is source available rather than OSI open source, and it forbids offering Nango to third parties as a managed service, so anyone planning to resell or embed it in a platform for their own customers has a genuine legal problem.
- Pricing is per connection where a connection is one authorised end-user account, so cost scales linearly with your customer base and a product where each user links several services multiplies quickly beyond what a headline plan price suggests.
- Pre-built integrations vary in depth, and a connection that exists is not the same as a connection that covers the endpoints and objects your feature needs, so each one must be verified before it is designed into a roadmap.
- Custom syncs are written in TypeScript and run in Nango model, which means integration logic lives in a vendor runtime and migrating away later requires rewriting it rather than lifting it out.
- Self-hosting removes the vendor from the data path but transfers operational responsibility for a component that holds customer OAuth tokens, and few teams appreciate the security burden that comes with running that themselves.
PubNub
- Free plan storage history is limited to 7 days, which is short for apps needing longer message retention.
- MAU-based pricing means costs scale directly with user growth, which can be less predictable than flat message-based pricing.
- Pro-tier custom pricing above 50,000 MAU requires contacting sales rather than self-serve checkout.
Pricing, plan by plan
Nango
Free- FreeFree
- 10 connections
- Pre-built integrations
- Managed OAuth
- Starter$50/month
- 20 connections included
- 1 USD per additional connection
- Custom syncs and actions
- Growth$500/month
- 100 connections included
- 1 USD per additional connection
- Higher limits
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Quoted
- Custom connection volumes
- Security review and SLA
PubNub
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 200 MAU or 1M transactions
- 1GB data storage (7 days)
- 5 test Serverless Functions
- Starter$98/month
- 1,000 MAU included
- User management
- Insights
- Pro$undefined/month
- Custom MAU packages
- Volume discounts
- Enterprise-scale configurations
Which should you pick?
Choose Nango if
- You need managed oauth.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker.
- You also want pre-built integrations.
Choose PubNub if
- You need pub/sub messaging.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, ios, android, api.
- You also want presence tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Nango or PubNub better?
- Neither clearly leads. Nango starts at Free and PubNub at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Nango or PubNub?
- Nango starts at Free and PubNub at Free.
- Does Nango or PubNub run on more platforms?
- Nango runs on Web, Linux, Docker. PubNub runs on web, ios, android, api.
- Can I use Nango for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Nango best used for?
- Nango is most often used for a saas product that needs to ship twenty customer-facing integrations without hiring a team to maintain oauth and token refresh for each, a team that needs a niche or internal api integrated, which closed unified api vendors will not build for them, a company with data residency or security constraints that must self-host the integration layer rather than send customer tokens to a vendor, an engineering team replacing a homegrown integration service whose main cost is silent token expiry and rate limit failures in production. Of those, a saas product that needs to ship twenty customer-facing integrations without hiring a team to maintain oauth and token refresh for each and a team that needs a niche or internal api integrated, which closed unified api vendors will not build for them are not what PubNub is typically brought in for.
- What can Nango do that PubNub cannot?
- Nango covers Managed OAuth, Pre-built integrations, Custom syncs and actions, Incremental sync. PubNub covers Pub/sub messaging, Presence tracking, Message persistence, Serverless Functions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Nango: Is Nango open source?
It is source available under Elastic License 2.0. You can read, modify and self-host it, but you cannot offer it to third parties as a managed service. That is not the same as an OSI approved open source licence.
PubNub: What does PubNub cost?
PubNub offers a free plan for up to 200 MAU or 1 million transactions, a Starter plan at $98/month for 1,000 MAU, and custom Pro pricing for larger volumes, e.g. around $550/month for 10,000 MAU.
SourceNango: How is it priced?
Per connection per month, where a connection is one authorised end-user account. Free to 10 connections, 50 dollars a month for Starter with 20, 500 for Growth with 100, and one dollar per additional connection.
PubNub: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Yes, the free plan supports up to 200 monthly active users or 1 million transactions, includes 1GB of data storage retained for 7 days, and requires no credit card.
SourceNango: Can we integrate an API Nango does not support?
Yes. Custom syncs and actions in TypeScript cover any API including internal ones, which is the main advantage over closed unified API products.
PubNub: How is usage metered?
PubNub bills primarily by Monthly Active Users, defined as a unique user who connects at least once in a billing cycle; messages are bundled into MAU pricing with no separate per-message fees, and overage is billed proportionally.
SourceNango: Can we self-host it?
Yes, under the Elastic License 2.0 terms, which permit self-hosting for your own use but not resale as a service.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Nango vs Alloy Automation
- Nango vs Merge
- Nango vs n8n
- Nango vs Paragon
- Nango vs Windmill
- Nango vs Meltano
- Nango vs RudderStack
- Nango vs Flowable
- Nango vs Grouparoo
- Nango vs Airbyte
- Nango vs Cyclr
- Nango vs Activiti
- Nango vs Prefect
- Nango vs Workato
- Nango vs Automation Anywhere
- Nango vs Blue Prism
- Nango vs CrewAI
- Nango vs Pusher
- Nango vs Ably
- Nango vs Liveblocks
- Nango vs Svix
- Nango vs Apollo GraphQL
- Nango vs Lithic
- Nango vs Yapily
- Nango vs Increase
- Nango vs Token.io
- Nango vs Episode Six
- Nango vs Moov
- Nango vs MX Technologies
- Nango vs Bruno
- Nango vs Bud Financial
- Nango vs Kong Gateway
- Nango vs Marqeta
- Nango vs Meniga
- PubNub vs Alloy Automation
- PubNub vs Merge
- PubNub vs n8n
- PubNub vs Paragon
- PubNub vs Windmill
- PubNub vs Meltano
- PubNub vs RudderStack
- PubNub vs Flowable
- PubNub vs Grouparoo
- PubNub vs Airbyte
- PubNub vs Cyclr
- PubNub vs Activiti
- PubNub vs Prefect
- PubNub vs Workato
- PubNub vs Automation Anywhere
- PubNub vs Blue Prism
- PubNub vs CrewAI
- PubNub vs Pusher
- PubNub vs Ably
- PubNub vs Liveblocks
- PubNub vs Svix
- PubNub vs Apollo GraphQL
- PubNub vs Lithic
- PubNub vs Yapily
- PubNub vs Increase
- PubNub vs Token.io
- PubNub vs Episode Six
- PubNub vs Moov
- PubNub vs MX Technologies
- PubNub vs Bruno
- PubNub vs Bud Financial
- PubNub vs Kong Gateway
- PubNub vs Marqeta
- PubNub vs Meniga
