Web Development · head to head
MySQL vs Amazon Redshift ML

Amazon Redshift ML
Machine Learning
SQL statements in Redshift that train models on SageMaker and return them as functions
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: MySQL hot online backup is not in the free Community Server; MySQL Enterprise Backup is a paid Enterprise Edition component; Amazon Redshift ML training is billed by SageMaker separately from Redshift, so a feature that looks like a free SQL statement produces a second line item on a different part of the bill that the analyst who ran it usually cannot see.
- They diverge on capability: MySQL covers ACID compliance, Amazon Redshift ML covers CREATE MODEL in SQL.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which MySQL and Amazon Redshift ML actually diverge.
| Attribute | MySQL | Amazon Redshift ML |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | usage-based |
| Platforms | Windows, Macos, Linux, Unix | Web |
| Category | Web Development | Machine Learning |
| Founded | 1995 | 2006 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in MySQL
- ACID compliance
- SQL support
- Multi-version concurrency control
- Replication
- Partitioning
- Stored procedures
- Triggers
- Views
Only in Amazon Redshift ML
- CREATE MODEL in SQL
- Automatic model selection
- Local inference
- Bring your own model
- Algorithm selection
- Cost ceiling controls
- Existing warehouse security
- Batch and interactive scoring
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
MySQL
- Web application backendnot Amazon Redshift ML
- E-commerce platformsnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Content management systemsnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Data warehousingnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Business applicationsnot Amazon Redshift ML
Amazon Redshift ML
- Adding a churn or propensity score to an existing dashboard where the data is already in Redshift and nobody needs a bespoke modelnot MySQL
- Letting an analytics team test whether a predictive column has any business value before asking for data science headcountnot MySQL
- Scoring rows inside a SQL pipeline where moving data out to a separate service would add fragility for little benefitnot MySQL
- Organisations committed to AWS whose main constraint is a data science backlog rather than modelling sophisticationnot MySQL
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
MySQL
- Hot online backup is not in the free Community Server; MySQL Enterprise Backup is a paid Enterprise Edition component
- Transparent Data Encryption, data masking and de-identification are Enterprise Edition only
- MySQL Enterprise Firewall, which guards against SQL injection, and MySQL Enterprise Audit are both paid components
- External authentication against PAM or Windows Active Directory requires MySQL Enterprise Authentication
- The thread pool ships as MySQL Enterprise Scalability rather than in the community build
Amazon Redshift ML
- Training is billed by SageMaker separately from Redshift, so a feature that looks like a free SQL statement produces a second line item on a different part of the bill that the analyst who ran it usually cannot see.
- Autopilot searches many candidate models by default and the duration and cost of CREATE MODEL scale with the data size and the MAX_CELLS setting, so an unconstrained statement against a large table is an expensive accident rather than an experiment.
- Local inference runs on the Redshift cluster itself, so scoring millions of rows competes for the resources the warehouse exists to provide, and the remote inference alternative adds a per-batch network call plus an hourly SageMaker endpoint charge that persists whether or not anyone queries it.
- The supported problem types are limited to what the exposed algorithms cover, so anything involving text, images, sequences, a custom loss function or a bespoke evaluation metric is out of scope and has to be built conventionally.
- There is no retraining schedule, drift detection or model registry, so a model created by a statement stays exactly as trained until somebody remembers to recreate it, and nothing in the warehouse will report that its accuracy has decayed.
Pricing, plan by plan
MySQL
Free- Community EditionFree
- Open source license
- Full SQL support
- InnoDB storage engine
- Standard Edition$2000/year
- Commercial license
- Oracle Premier Support
- MySQL Enterprise backup
- Enterprise Edition$5000/year
- Advanced security
- MySQL Enterprise Monitor
- High Availability
Amazon Redshift ML
Free- Free TrialFree
- 2-month trial
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Per-node pricing
- SageMaker training
Which should you pick?
Choose MySQL if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Unix.
- You also want sql support.
Choose Amazon Redshift ML if
- You need create model in sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automatic model selection.
Questions people ask
- Is MySQL or Amazon Redshift ML better?
- Neither clearly leads. MySQL starts at Free and Amazon Redshift ML at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, MySQL or Amazon Redshift ML?
- MySQL starts at Free and Amazon Redshift ML at Free.
- Does MySQL or Amazon Redshift ML run on more platforms?
- MySQL runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Unix. Amazon Redshift ML runs on Web.
- Can I use MySQL for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is MySQL best used for?
- MySQL is most often used for web application backend, e-commerce platforms, content management systems, data warehousing. Of those, web application backend and e-commerce platforms are not what Amazon Redshift ML is typically brought in for.
- What can MySQL do that Amazon Redshift ML cannot?
- MySQL covers ACID compliance, SQL support, Multi-version concurrency control, Replication. Amazon Redshift ML covers CREATE MODEL in SQL, Automatic model selection, Local inference, Bring your own model.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
MySQL: Does MySQL cost money?
MySQL is primarily open-source and free to use. Commercial editions and support services are available but pricing is not published on the main website.
SourceAmazon Redshift ML: Does it require SageMaker?
Yes. Redshift ML is an interface; the training happens in SageMaker and needs an IAM role and an S3 bucket for the intermediate data.
MySQL: How do I get MySQL pricing information?
For MySQL commercial editions and support pricing, customers can contact MySQL sales directly at +1-866-221-0634 or navigate to individual product pages.
SourceAmazon Redshift ML: Is there an extra charge?
The SQL interface is part of Redshift, but the training runs as a SageMaker job charged at SageMaker rates, and a remote inference endpoint is billed for as long as it exists.
Amazon Redshift ML: What kinds of model can it build?
Regression, binary and multiclass classification through the automatic path, plus direct use of XGBoost, linear learner, multilayer perceptron and K-means. Anything beyond structured tabular prediction is out of scope.
Amazon Redshift ML: Can I use a model I trained myself?
Yes, through the bring-your-own-model path, either compiled into the cluster for local inference or called as a remote SageMaker endpoint.
Amazon Redshift ML: Does it retrain automatically?
No. Retraining means running CREATE MODEL again, on a schedule you build yourself, and nothing in the product monitors whether it is needed.
Related pages
More on Amazon Redshift ML
Other head to heads
- MySQL vs Django
- MySQL vs Laravel
- MySQL vs Nginx
- MySQL vs npm
- MySQL vs Bolt.new
- MySQL vs Ruby on Rails
- MySQL vs Next.js
- MySQL vs Flask
- MySQL vs Nuxt
- MySQL vs PHP
- MySQL vs Spring Boot
- MySQL vs Node.js
- MySQL vs Wix
- MySQL vs Apache HTTP Server
- MySQL vs v0 by Vercel
- MySQL vs Wix Studio
- MySQL vs Google Vertex AI
- MySQL vs DataRobot
- MySQL vs Azure Machine Learning
- MySQL vs MATLAB
- MySQL vs Apache Spark MLlib
- MySQL vs RapidMiner
- MySQL vs Databricks
- MySQL vs SAS
- MySQL vs scikit-learn
- MySQL vs H2O.ai
- MySQL vs Weka
- MySQL vs DVC
- MySQL vs Hugging Face
- MySQL vs Kubeflow
- MySQL vs Langwatch
- MySQL vs LlamaIndex
- MySQL vs BigQuery ML
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Django
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Laravel
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Nginx
- Amazon Redshift ML vs npm
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Bolt.new
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Ruby on Rails
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Next.js
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Flask
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Nuxt
- Amazon Redshift ML vs PHP
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Spring Boot
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Node.js
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Wix
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Apache HTTP Server
- Amazon Redshift ML vs v0 by Vercel
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Wix Studio
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Google Vertex AI
- Amazon Redshift ML vs DataRobot
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Azure Machine Learning
- Amazon Redshift ML vs MATLAB
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Amazon Redshift ML vs RapidMiner
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Databricks
- Amazon Redshift ML vs SAS
- Amazon Redshift ML vs scikit-learn
- Amazon Redshift ML vs H2O.ai
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Weka
- Amazon Redshift ML vs DVC
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Hugging Face
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Kubeflow
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Langwatch
- Amazon Redshift ML vs LlamaIndex
- Amazon Redshift ML vs BigQuery ML

