Databases · head to head
Amazon Aurora vs MySQL

Amazon Aurora
Databases
MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Aurora aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services; MySQL hot online backup is not in the free Community Server; MySQL Enterprise Backup is a paid Enterprise Edition component
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, MySQL covers ACID compliance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Aurora and MySQL actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Aurora | MySQL |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Platforms | AWS Cloud | Windows, Macos, Linux, Unix |
| Category | Databases | Web Development |
| Founded | 2006 | 1995 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Aurora
- MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible
- 5x MySQL Performance
- Auto-scaling Storage
- Global Database
- Serverless v2
- Multi-master
- Fault Tolerant
- AWS Lambda
Only in MySQL
- ACID compliance
- SQL support
- Multi-version concurrency control
- Replication
- Partitioning
- Stored procedures
- Triggers
- Views
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Aurora
- Transaction processingnot MySQL
- Data storagenot MySQL
- Application backendnot MySQL
- Reportingnot MySQL
- Data analyticsnot MySQL
MySQL
- Web application backendnot Amazon Aurora
- E-commerce platformsnot Amazon Aurora
- Content management systemsnot Amazon Aurora
- Data warehousingnot Amazon Aurora
- Business applicationsnot Amazon Aurora
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Aurora
- Aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services
- Pricing can become expensive with high-traffic applications using many read replicas
- Limited support for non-relational data types compared to NoSQL alternatives
MySQL
- Hot online backup is not in the free Community Server; MySQL Enterprise Backup is a paid Enterprise Edition component
- Transparent Data Encryption, data masking and de-identification are Enterprise Edition only
- MySQL Enterprise Firewall, which guards against SQL injection, and MySQL Enterprise Audit are both paid components
- External authentication against PAM or Windows Active Directory requires MySQL Enterprise Authentication
- The thread pool ships as MySQL Enterprise Scalability rather than in the community build
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Aurora
Free- Serverless v2$0.12/hour
- Auto-scaling
- Pay per ACU
- Instant scaling
- Provisioned$29/month
- Dedicated instances
- Predictable performance
- Reserved capacity
MySQL
Free- Community EditionFree
- Open source license
- Full SQL support
- InnoDB storage engine
- Standard Edition$2000/year
- Commercial license
- Oracle Premier Support
- MySQL Enterprise backup
- Enterprise Edition$5000/year
- Advanced security
- MySQL Enterprise Monitor
- High Availability
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Aurora if
- You need mysql/postgresql compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Cloud.
- You also want 5x mysql performance.
Choose MySQL if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Unix.
- You also want sql support.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Aurora or MySQL better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Aurora starts at Free and MySQL at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Aurora or MySQL?
- Amazon Aurora starts at Free and MySQL at Free.
- Does Amazon Aurora or MySQL run on more platforms?
- Amazon Aurora runs on AWS Cloud. MySQL runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Unix.
- Can I use Amazon Aurora for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Aurora best used for?
- Amazon Aurora is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what MySQL is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Aurora do that MySQL cannot?
- Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, 5x MySQL Performance, Auto-scaling Storage, Global Database. MySQL covers ACID compliance, SQL support, Multi-version concurrency control, Replication.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Aurora: Is Amazon Aurora compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL?
Yes, Amazon Aurora offers MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility with full compatibility to their open-source counterparts, allowing you to migrate existing databases with standard tools.
SourceMySQL: Does MySQL cost money?
MySQL is primarily open-source and free to use. Commercial editions and support services are available but pricing is not published on the main website.
SourceAmazon Aurora: What uptime SLA does Amazon Aurora provide?
Aurora is designed for up to 99.99% single-region uptime and 99.999% multi-region uptime with automatic failover.
SourceMySQL: How do I get MySQL pricing information?
For MySQL commercial editions and support pricing, customers can contact MySQL sales directly at +1-866-221-0634 or navigate to individual product pages.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How much does Amazon Aurora cost?
Aurora uses serverless, usage-based pricing where you pay only for consumed capacity. Typical pricing ranges from $50-70 per month for minimal setups to $400-600 per month for small production clusters.
SourceAmazon Aurora: Can Amazon Aurora scale automatically?
Yes, Aurora automatically scales to match workload demands without performance degradation, supporting both read and write scaling.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How many read replicas does Aurora support?
Aurora supports up to 15 low-latency read replicas for distributing read traffic across your application.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Aurora
Other head to heads
- Amazon Aurora vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Aurora vs Firebolt
- Amazon Aurora vs FaunaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Aurora vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Aurora vs DataStax
- Amazon Aurora vs ScyllaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs MariaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Aiven
- Amazon Aurora vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Aurora vs Couchbase
- Amazon Aurora vs QuestDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Vitess
- Amazon Aurora vs BigQuery
- Amazon Aurora vs CosmosDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Amazon Aurora vs Django
- Amazon Aurora vs Laravel
- Amazon Aurora vs Nginx
- Amazon Aurora vs npm
- Amazon Aurora vs Bolt.new
- Amazon Aurora vs Ruby on Rails
- Amazon Aurora vs Next.js
- Amazon Aurora vs Flask
- Amazon Aurora vs Nuxt
- Amazon Aurora vs PHP
- Amazon Aurora vs Spring Boot
- Amazon Aurora vs Node.js
- Amazon Aurora vs Wix
- Amazon Aurora vs Apache HTTP Server
- Amazon Aurora vs v0 by Vercel
- Amazon Aurora vs Wix Studio
- MySQL vs PlanetScale
- MySQL vs Firebolt
- MySQL vs FaunaDB
- MySQL vs Cockroach Labs
- MySQL vs Azure SQL
- MySQL vs DataStax
- MySQL vs ScyllaDB
- MySQL vs MariaDB
- MySQL vs Aiven
- MySQL vs Apache Druid
- MySQL vs Couchbase
- MySQL vs QuestDB
- MySQL vs Vitess
- MySQL vs BigQuery
- MySQL vs CosmosDB
- MySQL vs Microsoft SQL Server
- MySQL vs Django
- MySQL vs Laravel
- MySQL vs Nginx
- MySQL vs npm
- MySQL vs Bolt.new
- MySQL vs Ruby on Rails
- MySQL vs Next.js
- MySQL vs Flask
- MySQL vs Nuxt
- MySQL vs PHP
- MySQL vs Spring Boot
- MySQL vs Node.js
- MySQL vs Wix
- MySQL vs Apache HTTP Server
- MySQL vs v0 by Vercel
- MySQL vs Wix Studio

