APIs · head to head
MX Technologies vs Stoplight

MX Technologies
APIs
US financial data aggregation with heavy transaction cleansing and enrichment
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Stoplight has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: MX Technologies coverage is United States focused, so any product with European or other international users runs a second aggregator and reconciles two data models, which removes most of the single vendor argument.; Stoplight the free plan allows one project and one user
- They diverge on capability: MX Technologies covers Account aggregation, Stoplight covers API Design.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which MX Technologies and Stoplight actually diverge.
| Attribute | MX Technologies | Stoplight |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | API, Web | Web, Cloud |
| Founded | Unknown | 2014 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in MX Technologies
- Account aggregation
- Transaction cleansing
- Categorisation
- Merchant resolution
- Account verification
- Balance and funds checks
- Data enhancement APIs
- Consent and connection management
Only in Stoplight
- API Design
- API Documentation
- Governance
- GitHub
- GitLab
- Jenkins
- Azure DevOps
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
MX Technologies
- A credit union building a personal finance view in its own app that needs its own transaction descriptions made readablenot Stoplight
- A lender using cash flow underwriting that needs categorised income and expense data rather than raw transaction stringsnot Stoplight
- A bank wanting account verification and balance checks before initiating ACH debits to reduce returnsnot Stoplight
- A fintech that already aggregates data elsewhere and licenses only the enrichment layer to clean what it hasnot Stoplight
Stoplight
- API design and documentationnot MX Technologies
- API governance and standardsnot MX Technologies
- Team collaboration on API developmentnot MX Technologies
- API mocking and testingnot MX Technologies
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
MX Technologies
- Coverage is United States focused, so any product with European or other international users runs a second aggregator and reconciles two data models, which removes most of the single vendor argument.
- Nothing is published on price and contracts are enterprise shaped, so a small fintech cannot estimate cost or start building without a sales process, unlike self-serve competitors.
- Data enhancement is the differentiator and is licensed separately from aggregation, so the quoted aggregation price is not the price of the product people actually buy it for.
- Categorisation and merchant resolution are statistical and get business to business and unusual transactions wrong more often than consumer retail, so lending decisions built on categorised data need their own review layer.
- As the United States moves to regulated API access, connection quality depends on what each institution exposes, and the long tail of small banks and credit unions remains the weakest part of any aggregator including this one.
Stoplight
- The free plan allows one project and one user
- Private projects, multi branch support and custom domains start at the Startup plan, $113 a month billed annually
- SSO and shared style guides are Pro Team only, at $362 a month billed annually
- Seats beyond each plan's allowance are $11 to $27 each per month depending on tier and billing period
Pricing, plan by plan
MX Technologies
On request- MX Platform$undefined/year
- Priced by connected users, API calls and modules
- Data enhancement licensed separately from aggregation
- Enterprise contracts aimed at financial institutions
Stoplight
Free- FreeFree
- 1 project
- 1 user
- Basic API design and documentation features
- Basic$56/month
- Annual: $44/user/year
- 3 included users; $14 per additional user (monthly)
- Unlimited projects
- Startup$147/month
- Annual: $113/user/year
- 8 included users; $14 per additional user (monthly)
- Private projects
- Pro Team$453/month
- Annual: $362/user/year
- 15 included users; $27 per additional user (monthly)
- Up to 20 teams
Which should you pick?
Choose MX Technologies if
- You need account aggregation.
- You work on API, Web.
- You also want transaction cleansing.
Choose Stoplight if
- You need api design.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want api documentation.
Questions people ask
- Is MX Technologies or Stoplight better?
- Neither clearly leads. MX Technologies starts at On request and Stoplight at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, MX Technologies or Stoplight?
- Stoplight has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for MX Technologies and Free for Stoplight.
- Does MX Technologies or Stoplight run on more platforms?
- MX Technologies runs on API, Web. Stoplight runs on Web, Cloud.
- Can I use Stoplight for free?
- Yes. Stoplight has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. MX Technologies starts at On request.
- What is MX Technologies best used for?
- MX Technologies is most often used for a credit union building a personal finance view in its own app that needs its own transaction descriptions made readable, a lender using cash flow underwriting that needs categorised income and expense data rather than raw transaction strings, a bank wanting account verification and balance checks before initiating ach debits to reduce returns, a fintech that already aggregates data elsewhere and licenses only the enrichment layer to clean what it has. Of those, a credit union building a personal finance view in its own app that needs its own transaction descriptions made readable and a lender using cash flow underwriting that needs categorised income and expense data rather than raw transaction strings are not what Stoplight is typically brought in for.
- What can MX Technologies do that Stoplight cannot?
- MX Technologies covers Account aggregation, Transaction cleansing, Categorisation, Merchant resolution. Stoplight covers API Design, API Documentation, Governance, GitHub.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
MX Technologies: What does MX do that Plaid does not?
It sells transaction cleansing, categorisation and merchant resolution as a first class product, including on data you already hold, which is why financial institutions rather than startups are its core customers.
Stoplight: How much does Stoplight cost?
Stoplight starts with a free plan (1 project, 1 user), then Basic at $56/month per user (or $44/year), Startup at $147/month per user (or $113/year), Pro Team at $453/month per user (or $362/year), and Enterprise at custom pricing.
SourceMX Technologies: Does it cover Europe?
No. MX is United States focused. European coverage requires a different provider such as Tink.
Stoplight: How many included users are in each Stoplight plan?
Basic includes 3 users, Startup includes 8 users, and Pro Team includes 15 users. Additional users beyond the included count cost $14/month for Basic and Startup, or $27/month for Pro Team.
SourceMX Technologies: Is pricing published?
No. Contracts are quoted by connected users, call volume and modules, with enhancement licensed separately from aggregation.
Stoplight: Does Stoplight offer a free trial?
Yes, all paid Stoplight plans include a 14-day free trial. The free plan has no trial period as it is always available.
SourceMX Technologies: Does it use screen scraping?
It uses direct bank APIs where institutions expose them and credential based connections elsewhere. The credential path is being deprecated across the industry, and coverage quality now tracks which banks have real APIs.
Stoplight: Does Stoplight's free plan have limitations?
Yes, the free plan includes only 1 project and 1 user. Users viewing public documentation anonymously are not counted toward the 1-user limit.
SourceRelated pages
More on MX Technologies
Other head to heads
- MX Technologies vs Yodlee
- MX Technologies vs Tink
- MX Technologies vs Bud Financial
- MX Technologies vs Akoya
- MX Technologies vs Ozone API
- MX Technologies vs Yapily
- MX Technologies vs Enable Banking
- MX Technologies vs Method Financial
- MX Technologies vs TrueLayer
- MX Technologies vs Token.io
- MX Technologies vs Brite Payments
- MX Technologies vs Volt
- MX Technologies vs Temenos Transact
- MX Technologies vs Treasury Prime
- MX Technologies vs 10x Banking
- MX Technologies vs Sanity
- MX Technologies vs Appwrite
- MX Technologies vs Hasura
- MX Technologies vs PocketBase
- MX Technologies vs Apidog
- MX Technologies vs Swagger
- MX Technologies vs Akana
- MX Technologies vs WSO2 API Manager
- MX Technologies vs GraphQL Playground
- MX Technologies vs Apigee
- MX Technologies vs Treblle
- MX Technologies vs Meniga
- MX Technologies vs Moov
- MX Technologies vs PubNub
- MX Technologies vs Skaleet
- MX Technologies vs Svix
- Stoplight vs Yodlee
- Stoplight vs Tink
- Stoplight vs Bud Financial
- Stoplight vs Akoya
- Stoplight vs Ozone API
- Stoplight vs Yapily
- Stoplight vs Enable Banking
- Stoplight vs Method Financial
- Stoplight vs TrueLayer
- Stoplight vs Token.io
- Stoplight vs Brite Payments
- Stoplight vs Volt
- Stoplight vs Temenos Transact
- Stoplight vs Treasury Prime
- Stoplight vs 10x Banking
- Stoplight vs Sanity
- Stoplight vs Appwrite
- Stoplight vs Hasura
- Stoplight vs PocketBase
- Stoplight vs Apidog
- Stoplight vs Swagger
- Stoplight vs Akana
- Stoplight vs WSO2 API Manager
- Stoplight vs GraphQL Playground
- Stoplight vs Apigee
- Stoplight vs Treblle
- Stoplight vs Meniga
- Stoplight vs Moov
- Stoplight vs PubNub
- Stoplight vs Skaleet
- Stoplight vs Svix

