Networking · head to head
Eclipse Mosquitto vs Steampipe

Eclipse Mosquitto
Networking
Small, EPL-licensed MQTT broker that runs on hardware other brokers cannot
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Steampipe
Developer Tools
Query cloud APIs, SaaS tools and code with SQL, with no extract or load step
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Eclipse Mosquitto there is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.; Steampipe aGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- They diverge on capability: Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eclipse Mosquitto and Steampipe actually diverge.
| Attribute | Eclipse Mosquitto | Steampipe |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Open source, with paid hosting through Turbot Pipes |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web |
| Category | Networking | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eclipse Mosquitto
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Very small footprint
- Bridging
- WebSockets listener
- Command line clients
- Dynamic security plugin
Only in Steampipe
- SQL over live APIs
- Wide plugin set
- Embedded Postgres
- Compliance benchmarks
- Joins across providers
- Hosted option
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- A home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything elsenot Steampipe
- An industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud brokernot Steampipe
- Local development and testing of MQTT clients without provisioning a cloud IoT servicenot Steampipe
- An air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirementnot Steampipe
Steampipe
- Security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly exportnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is askednot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Inventory and drift questions spanning several cloud providers in one querynot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Engineers who would rather write SQL than learn each provider command line toolnot Eclipse Mosquitto
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- There is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.
- Persistence is a local file rather than a replicated store, so a disk failure or an unclean shutdown can lose retained messages and queued QoS traffic.
- Practical capacity is a few thousand concurrent clients on typical hardware, so a growing device fleet eventually forces a migration to a clustered broker.
- The Eclipse Public Licence is weak copyleft rather than permissive, which some legal teams treat as a blocker when embedding the broker in a shipped commercial product.
- There is no commercial support to buy from the project, so production incidents rely on community mailing lists or on paying a third party who happens to know the codebase.
Steampipe
- AGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- Dashboards, benchmarks and mods were removed from Steampipe entirely at version 1.0 in October 2024 and now live in a separate product, so pre-2024 documentation and tutorials describe commands that no longer exist.
- Live querying is bound by cloud provider API rate limits and keeps no persistent store by default, which is why a separate DuckDB-backed product exists for log volumes and why large accounts return slowly.
- The company is fifteen people and bootstrapped, maintaining four command line tools plus a hosted service plus two further products, and the newer tools have thin community traction relative to that surface area.
- Hosted tiers include only three users regardless of tier, with additional Enterprise users charged separately, so a team of thirty costs an order of magnitude more than the headline figure before compute and storage are counted.
Pricing, plan by plan
Eclipse Mosquitto
Free- Eclipse MosquittoFree
- Eclipse Public License 2.0 with Eclipse Distribution Licence
- MQTT 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1
- No client or message limits beyond your hardware
Steampipe
Free- Steampipe CLIFree
- AGPL-3.0
- All plugins
- No user or query limits
- Pipes DeveloperFree
- One user
- 400 compute minutes
- 3GB storage
- Pipes Team$49/month
- Three users
- 2,000 compute minutes
- 20GB storage
- Pipes Enterprise$249/month
- Three users
- 10,000 compute minutes
- 100GB storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Eclipse Mosquitto if
- You need mqtt 5.0 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker.
- You also want very small footprint.
Choose Steampipe if
- You need sql over live apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- You also want wide plugin set.
Questions people ask
- Is Eclipse Mosquitto or Steampipe better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and Steampipe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eclipse Mosquitto or Steampipe?
- Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and Steampipe at Free.
- Does Eclipse Mosquitto or Steampipe run on more platforms?
- Eclipse Mosquitto runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker. Steampipe runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- Can I use Eclipse Mosquitto for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Eclipse Mosquitto best used for?
- Eclipse Mosquitto is most often used for a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else, an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker, local development and testing of mqtt clients without provisioning a cloud iot service, an air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirement. Of those, a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else and an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker are not what Steampipe is typically brought in for.
- What can Eclipse Mosquitto do that Steampipe cannot?
- Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Very small footprint, Bridging, WebSockets listener. Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs, Wide plugin set, Embedded Postgres, Compliance benchmarks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eclipse Mosquitto: Can Mosquitto be clustered?
No. It is a single process. High availability requires an external failover arrangement you build yourself.
Steampipe: When did Steampipe become AGPL?
May 2021, about four months after the project went public. It is a settled licence rather than a recent change, and predates the Business Source Licence wave it is often confused with.
Eclipse Mosquitto: What licence is it?
Eclipse Public License 2.0 alongside the Eclipse Distribution License, a weak copyleft rather than a permissive licence.
Steampipe: Where did the dashboards and benchmarks go?
Into Powerpipe. They were deprecated in March 2024 and removed from Steampipe at version 1.0 in October 2024, so the check, dashboard, mod and variable commands are gone.
Eclipse Mosquitto: How many clients can it handle?
A few thousand concurrent connections on ordinary hardware; beyond that, use a clustered broker.
Steampipe: Is it fast on a large cloud estate?
Not always. Queries call provider APIs at request time, so rate limits rather than query planning set the pace, and there is no persistent store by default.
Eclipse Mosquitto: Does it support MQTT 5?
Yes, along with 3.1.1 and 3.1.
Steampipe: Does the AGPL affect internal use?
Running it internally for your own analysis is fine. Putting a web interface in front of it that other people use is where the network clause becomes a question for your legal team.
Steampipe: Is a bootstrapped vendor a risk?
It cuts both ways. There is no investor pressure toward a licence change or an exit, and there are also fifteen people supporting a large product surface.
Related pages
More on Eclipse Mosquitto
Other head to heads
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs HiveMQ
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Traefik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs pfSense
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OpenVPN
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Icinga
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Consul
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs LibreNMS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zabbix
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nebula
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Netdata
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Catchpoint
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Atlantis
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Jitsu
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Frappe
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Visual Studio Code
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Penpot
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs GNU Emacs
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Bazel
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Eclipse IDE
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Pants Build
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Swagger UI
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Ansible
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Helix
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs JFrog Artifactory
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Namespace
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nix
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nixpacks
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Octopus Deploy
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Okteto
- Steampipe vs HiveMQ
- Steampipe vs Traefik
- Steampipe vs pfSense
- Steampipe vs OpenVPN
- Steampipe vs Icinga
- Steampipe vs Consul
- Steampipe vs LibreNMS
- Steampipe vs Zabbix
- Steampipe vs Nebula
- Steampipe vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Steampipe vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Steampipe vs Netdata
- Steampipe vs Catchpoint
- Steampipe vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Steampipe vs Atlantis
- Steampipe vs Jitsu
- Steampipe vs Frappe
- Steampipe vs Visual Studio Code
- Steampipe vs Penpot
- Steampipe vs GNU Emacs
- Steampipe vs Bazel
- Steampipe vs Eclipse IDE
- Steampipe vs Pants Build
- Steampipe vs Swagger UI
- Steampipe vs Ansible
- Steampipe vs Helix
- Steampipe vs JFrog Artifactory
- Steampipe vs Namespace
- Steampipe vs Nix
- Steampipe vs Nixpacks
- Steampipe vs Octopus Deploy
- Steampipe vs Okteto
