Cloud · head to head
Crossplane vs Eclipse Mosquitto

Eclipse Mosquitto
Networking
Small, EPL-licensed MQTT broker that runs on hardware other brokers cannot
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Crossplane requires Kubernetes expertise and infrastructure; Eclipse Mosquitto there is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.
- They diverge on capability: Crossplane covers Kubernetes extension, Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Crossplane and Eclipse Mosquitto actually diverge.
| Attribute | Crossplane | Eclipse Mosquitto |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Kubernetes, AWS, Azure, GCP | Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker |
| Category | Cloud | Networking |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Crossplane
- Kubernetes extension
- Custom API building
- Resource management anywhere
- Declarative interfaces
- Component library
- Provider ecosystem
Only in Eclipse Mosquitto
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Very small footprint
- Bridging
- WebSockets listener
- Command line clients
- Dynamic security plugin
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Crossplane
- Building platform-as-a-service offerings for internal teamsnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Creating unified control layers for multi-cloud infrastructurenot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Designing declarative APIs for infrastructure provisioningnot Eclipse Mosquitto
Eclipse Mosquitto
- A home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything elsenot Crossplane
- An industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud brokernot Crossplane
- Local development and testing of MQTT clients without provisioning a cloud IoT servicenot Crossplane
- An air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirementnot Crossplane
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Crossplane
- Requires Kubernetes expertise and infrastructure
- Steep learning curve for teams new to Kubernetes patterns
- Provider ecosystem smaller than Terraform
Eclipse Mosquitto
- There is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.
- Persistence is a local file rather than a replicated store, so a disk failure or an unclean shutdown can lose retained messages and queued QoS traffic.
- Practical capacity is a few thousand concurrent clients on typical hardware, so a growing device fleet eventually forces a migration to a clustered broker.
- The Eclipse Public Licence is weak copyleft rather than permissive, which some legal teams treat as a blocker when embedding the broker in a shipped commercial product.
- There is no commercial support to buy from the project, so production incidents rely on community mailing lists or on paying a third party who happens to know the codebase.
Pricing, plan by plan
Crossplane
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Crossplane review.
Eclipse Mosquitto
Free- Eclipse MosquittoFree
- Eclipse Public License 2.0 with Eclipse Distribution Licence
- MQTT 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1
- No client or message limits beyond your hardware
Which should you pick?
Choose Crossplane if
- You need kubernetes extension.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want custom api building.
Choose Eclipse Mosquitto if
- You need mqtt 5.0 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker.
- You also want very small footprint.
Questions people ask
- Is Crossplane or Eclipse Mosquitto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Crossplane starts at Free and Eclipse Mosquitto at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Crossplane or Eclipse Mosquitto?
- Crossplane starts at Free and Eclipse Mosquitto at Free.
- Does Crossplane or Eclipse Mosquitto run on more platforms?
- Crossplane runs on Kubernetes, AWS, Azure, GCP. Eclipse Mosquitto runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker.
- Can I use Crossplane for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Crossplane best used for?
- Crossplane is most often used for building platform-as-a-service offerings for internal teams, creating unified control layers for multi-cloud infrastructure, designing declarative apis for infrastructure provisioning. Of those, building platform-as-a-service offerings for internal teams and creating unified control layers for multi-cloud infrastructure are not what Eclipse Mosquitto is typically brought in for.
- What can Crossplane do that Eclipse Mosquitto cannot?
- Crossplane covers Kubernetes extension, Custom API building, Resource management anywhere, Declarative interfaces. Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Very small footprint, Bridging, WebSockets listener.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Crossplane: Is Crossplane free?
Yes, Crossplane is open source and free to use. It requires a Kubernetes cluster but has no licensing costs.
SourceEclipse Mosquitto: Can Mosquitto be clustered?
No. It is a single process. High availability requires an external failover arrangement you build yourself.
Crossplane: What is Crossplane used for?
Crossplane is used to build control planes and platforms for infrastructure management, enabling platform teams to expose safe APIs to other teams.
SourceEclipse Mosquitto: What licence is it?
Eclipse Public License 2.0 alongside the Eclipse Distribution License, a weak copyleft rather than a permissive licence.
Eclipse Mosquitto: How many clients can it handle?
A few thousand concurrent connections on ordinary hardware; beyond that, use a clustered broker.
Eclipse Mosquitto: Does it support MQTT 5?
Yes, along with 3.1.1 and 3.1.
Related pages
More on Eclipse Mosquitto
Other head to heads
- Crossplane vs Pulumi
- Crossplane vs containerd
- Crossplane vs Nitric
- Crossplane vs Vault
- Crossplane vs Portworx
- Crossplane vs Microsoft Azure
- Crossplane vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Crossplane vs DigitalOcean
- Crossplane vs Podman
- Crossplane vs K3s
- Crossplane vs OpenEBS
- Crossplane vs OVHcloud
- Crossplane vs Puppet
- Crossplane vs Cilium
- Crossplane vs Nomad
- Crossplane vs HiveMQ
- Crossplane vs Traefik
- Crossplane vs pfSense
- Crossplane vs OpenVPN
- Crossplane vs Icinga
- Crossplane vs Consul
- Crossplane vs LibreNMS
- Crossplane vs Zabbix
- Crossplane vs Nebula
- Crossplane vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Crossplane vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Crossplane vs Netdata
- Crossplane vs Catchpoint
- Crossplane vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Pulumi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs containerd
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nitric
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Vault
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Portworx
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Microsoft Azure
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs DigitalOcean
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Podman
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs K3s
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OpenEBS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OVHcloud
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Puppet
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Cilium
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nomad
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs HiveMQ
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Traefik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs pfSense
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OpenVPN
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Icinga
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Consul
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs LibreNMS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zabbix
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nebula
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Netdata
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Catchpoint
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Ubiquiti UniFi

