Networking · head to head
HiveMQ vs MQTT

HiveMQ
Networking
Enterprise MQTT broker for industrial IoT with a published self-managed price list
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: HiveMQ the Community Edition lacks clustering, persistence extensions, the control centre and all enterprise bridges, so a prototype built on it does not become production by buying support.; MQTT mQTT is an open-source protocol standard with no commercial pricing; not a commercial product
- They diverge on capability: HiveMQ covers MQTT 5 and 3.1.1, MQTT covers Publish-Subscribe.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which HiveMQ and MQTT actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in HiveMQ
- MQTT 5 and 3.1.1
- Native clustering
- Data Hub
- Extension framework
- Enterprise bridges
- Control centre
Only in MQTT
- Publish-Subscribe
- Lightweight
- QoS Levels
- Retained Messages
- IoT platforms
- Home automation
- Cloud services
- Edge devices
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
HiveMQ
- A connected vehicle fleet where devices drop off the network for hours and sessions must survivenot MQTT
- An industrial plant bridging MQTT telemetry into Kafka without writing and operating the bridgenot MQTT
- A utility that needs message-level schema validation so one faulty firmware release cannot corrupt the data lakenot MQTT
- An IoT project that needs a self-managed broker price for a budget submission without entering a sales processnot MQTT
MQTT
- IoT messagingnot HiveMQ
- Sensor datanot HiveMQ
- Real-time updatesnot HiveMQ
- Device telemetrynot HiveMQ
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
HiveMQ
- The Community Edition lacks clustering, persistence extensions, the control centre and all enterprise bridges, so a prototype built on it does not become production by buying support.
- The entry commercial tiers cap at ten thousand connections, and device fleets grow, so the step to Enterprise capacity pricing arrives sooner than most projects plan for.
- It is a JVM application, so memory tuning and garbage collection behaviour become the operator’s problem at high connection counts, unlike the C-based brokers in this space.
- Extensions are written in Java against HiveMQ’s SPI, which means custom authentication logic is locked to the platform and cannot move to another broker.
- For simple use cases it is substantially heavier and more expensive than Mosquitto or EMQX, and small deployments frequently pay enterprise prices for clustering they never use.
MQTT
- MQTT is an open-source protocol standard with no commercial pricing; not a commercial product
Pricing, plan by plan
HiveMQ
Free- Community EditionFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- MQTT 3.1.1 and 5 support
- Single broker, no clustering
- Launch$299/month
- Ten thousand connections
- Five hundred messages per second
- Single broker deployment
- Run$499/month
- Ten thousand connections
- One thousand messages per second
- Single broker deployment
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Priced by connections and throughput
- Multi-broker and multi-site deployments
- Distributed data intelligence
MQTT
Free- Open ProtocolFree
- Publish-subscribe
- Lightweight
- QoS levels
Which should you pick?
Choose HiveMQ if
- You need mqtt 5 and 3.1.1.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want native clustering.
Choose MQTT if
- You need publish-subscribe.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Any platform, Embedded devices, Cloud, Edge computing.
- You also want lightweight.
Questions people ask
- Is HiveMQ or MQTT better?
- Neither clearly leads. HiveMQ starts at Free and MQTT at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, HiveMQ or MQTT?
- HiveMQ starts at Free and MQTT at Free.
- Does HiveMQ or MQTT run on more platforms?
- HiveMQ runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web. MQTT runs on Any platform, Embedded devices, Cloud, Edge computing.
- Can I use HiveMQ for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is HiveMQ best used for?
- HiveMQ is most often used for a connected vehicle fleet where devices drop off the network for hours and sessions must survive, an industrial plant bridging mqtt telemetry into kafka without writing and operating the bridge, a utility that needs message-level schema validation so one faulty firmware release cannot corrupt the data lake, an iot project that needs a self-managed broker price for a budget submission without entering a sales process. Of those, a connected vehicle fleet where devices drop off the network for hours and sessions must survive and an industrial plant bridging mqtt telemetry into kafka without writing and operating the bridge are not what MQTT is typically brought in for.
- What can HiveMQ do that MQTT cannot?
- HiveMQ covers MQTT 5 and 3.1.1, Native clustering, Data Hub, Extension framework. MQTT covers Publish-Subscribe, Lightweight, QoS Levels, Retained Messages.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
HiveMQ: Is HiveMQ free?
The Community Edition is Apache 2.0 and free, but it has no clustering and none of the enterprise extensions.
MQTT: Does MQTT have a commercial license cost?
MQTT is an open-source communication protocol and standard. No pricing is published because MQTT itself is not a commercial product for sale.
SourceHiveMQ: What does the commercial version cost?
Self-managed Launch is 299 US dollars a month for ten thousand connections; Run is 499 with higher throughput.
HiveMQ: Does it support MQTT 5?
Yes, both MQTT 5 and 3.1.1, including shared subscriptions and session expiry intervals.
HiveMQ: Can it bridge into Kafka?
Yes, via a commercial enterprise extension, not in the Community Edition.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- HiveMQ vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- HiveMQ vs Catchpoint
- HiveMQ vs Domotz
- HiveMQ vs NetBird
- HiveMQ vs pfSense
- HiveMQ vs Auvik
- HiveMQ vs Zabbix
- HiveMQ vs Ivanti
- HiveMQ vs Cisco Meraki
- HiveMQ vs Kentik
- HiveMQ vs LibreNMS
- HiveMQ vs OpenVPN
- HiveMQ vs Icinga
- HiveMQ vs MikroTik RouterOS
- HiveMQ vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- HiveMQ vs Home Assistant
- HiveMQ vs Amazon Alexa
- HiveMQ vs Apple HomeKit
- HiveMQ vs Google Home
- HiveMQ vs Thread
- HiveMQ vs Zigbee Alliance
- HiveMQ vs Z-Wave Alliance
- HiveMQ vs Arduino Cloud
- HiveMQ vs Node-RED
- HiveMQ vs Blynk
- HiveMQ vs Losant
- HiveMQ vs LIFX
- HiveMQ vs ThingWorx
- HiveMQ vs TP-Link Kasa
- HiveMQ vs Aqara
- HiveMQ vs Matter
- MQTT vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- MQTT vs Catchpoint
- MQTT vs Domotz
- MQTT vs NetBird
- MQTT vs pfSense
- MQTT vs Auvik
- MQTT vs Zabbix
- MQTT vs Ivanti
- MQTT vs Cisco Meraki
- MQTT vs Kentik
- MQTT vs LibreNMS
- MQTT vs OpenVPN
- MQTT vs Icinga
- MQTT vs MikroTik RouterOS
- MQTT vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- MQTT vs Home Assistant
- MQTT vs Amazon Alexa
- MQTT vs Apple HomeKit
- MQTT vs Google Home
- MQTT vs Thread
- MQTT vs Zigbee Alliance
- MQTT vs Z-Wave Alliance
- MQTT vs Arduino Cloud
- MQTT vs Node-RED
- MQTT vs Blynk
- MQTT vs Losant
- MQTT vs LIFX
- MQTT vs ThingWorx
- MQTT vs TP-Link Kasa
- MQTT vs Aqara
- MQTT vs Matter

