APIs · head to head
Moov vs Tuum

Moov
APIs
Payments API with a published rate card covering card acceptance, ACH and instant payouts
- From
- $500/month
- Rated
- -

Tuum
APIs
Modular core banking platform from Estonia, formerly branded Modularbank
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Moov the 500 US dollar monthly minimum makes Moov unattractive below roughly 80,000 dollars a month of card volume, since the minimum rather than the rate becomes your effective price.; Tuum it is a smaller, younger company than Mambu, so it has fewer live reference deployments and a shorter track record to evaluate risk against.
- They diverge on capability: Moov covers Interchange-plus card acceptance, Tuum covers Modular product structure.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Moov and Tuum actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Moov
- Interchange-plus card acceptance
- ACH transfers
- Instant payments
- Wallets
- Payment links and invoices
- Virtual cards
- Account verification
- Card account updater
Only in Tuum
- Modular product structure
- Low-code integration middleware
- Cloud-agnostic deployment
- Multi-currency real-time accounts
- Cards and lending modules
- Faster migration timeline
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Moov
- A vertical SaaS company embedding payments that needs published unit economics to price its own product before signing anythingnot Tuum
- A marketplace paying contractors that wants same-day ACH and instant push-to-card in one API with the cost of each visiblenot Tuum
- A platform that must hold balances for end users between collection and payout without becoming a money transmitternot Tuum
- A software company moving off a legacy gateway that wants interchange-plus transparency instead of a blended rate that hides interchange increasesnot Tuum
Tuum
- A bank wanting to migrate specific banking products to the cloud within months rather than replacing its entire core at oncenot Moov
- A fintech in the DACH region or Middle East wanting a European core banking vendor with regional expansion focusnot Moov
- An institution wanting low-code middleware to connect new modules to an existing legacy core rather than a full rebuildnot Moov
- A company researching "Modularbank" that needs to confirm it is the same company now branded Tuumnot Moov
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Moov
- The 500 US dollar monthly minimum makes Moov unattractive below roughly 80,000 dollars a month of card volume, since the minimum rather than the rate becomes your effective price.
- The 50 cent monthly charge per active wallet penalises platforms with many end users who transact rarely, and that cost grows with your user base rather than your revenue.
- United States only, so any platform with international sellers or buyers needs a second provider and a second reconciliation process.
- At very high volume the published interchange-plus markup is less competitive than a directly negotiated acquiring relationship, so success eventually creates a reason to leave.
- The ecosystem of prebuilt integrations, plugins and third-party tooling is far smaller than Stripe's, so anything outside the core API, from tax handling to subscription logic, is work you build yourself.
Tuum
- It is a smaller, younger company than Mambu, so it has fewer live reference deployments and a shorter track record to evaluate risk against.
- The 2022-era rebrand from Modularbank to Tuum means older funding records, case studies and press coverage appear under a different name, complicating due diligence for anyone unaware of the change.
- Pricing is entirely unpublished, requiring a sales conversation to budget against competing composable core vendors.
- Its geographic expansion into DACH and the Middle East is comparatively recent, so support depth and local regulatory expertise in those markets are less proven than in its home Baltic and Nordic base.
- As with any core banking platform, choosing Tuum is a multi-year infrastructure commitment; switching cores after implementation is a major undertaking regardless of how modular the initial adoption was.
Pricing, plan by plan
Moov
$500/month- Standard$500/month
- 500 USD monthly minimum, no setup fee
- Card online at interchange plus 0.60% and 15c
- Tap to pay at interchange plus 0.50% and 15c
- Custom$undefined/month
- Negotiated rates for high volume
- Specialised business models
- Dedicated support
Tuum
On request- Tuum$undefined/year
- Subscription and module-based pricing, not published
- Custom quote required via sales
Which should you pick?
Choose Moov if
- You need interchange-plus card acceptance.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android.
- You also want ach transfers.
Choose Tuum if
- You need modular product structure.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want low-code integration middleware.
Questions people ask
- Is Moov or Tuum better?
- Neither clearly leads. Moov starts at $500/month and Tuum at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Moov or Tuum?
- Moov starts at $500/month and Tuum at On request.
- Does Moov or Tuum run on more platforms?
- Moov runs on Web, API, iOS, Android. Tuum runs on Web, API.
- What is Moov best used for?
- Moov is most often used for a vertical saas company embedding payments that needs published unit economics to price its own product before signing anything, a marketplace paying contractors that wants same-day ach and instant push-to-card in one api with the cost of each visible, a platform that must hold balances for end users between collection and payout without becoming a money transmitter, a software company moving off a legacy gateway that wants interchange-plus transparency instead of a blended rate that hides interchange increases. Of those, a vertical saas company embedding payments that needs published unit economics to price its own product before signing anything and a marketplace paying contractors that wants same-day ach and instant push-to-card in one api with the cost of each visible are not what Tuum is typically brought in for.
- What can Moov do that Tuum cannot?
- Moov covers Interchange-plus card acceptance, ACH transfers, Instant payments, Wallets. Tuum covers Modular product structure, Low-code integration middleware, Cloud-agnostic deployment, Multi-currency real-time accounts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Moov: Does Moov publish its prices?
Yes, in unusual detail: interchange-plus card rates, per-transaction ACH and RTP charges, dispute and return fees, and the monthly minimum are all on the pricing page.
Tuum: Is Tuum the same company as Modularbank?
Yes, Modularbank rebranded to Tuum; it is the same company and platform.
Moov: What is the monthly minimum?
500 US dollars, with no setup fee. Wallet charges and transaction fees count towards it.
Tuum: Where is it strongest geographically?
Its base is Estonia and the Nordic and Baltic region, with newer expansion into DACH and the Middle East.
Moov: Can I use Moov outside the United States?
No. Moov handles US payments only, though it accepts international cards at an extra 1.5 percent.
Tuum: Is pricing published?
No, subscription and module pricing require a sales conversation.
Moov: Is Moov a bank?
No. It is a payments platform working with partner financial institutions, so account and settlement arrangements depend on those partners.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Moov vs Dwolla
- Moov vs Formance
- Moov vs Increase
- Moov vs Sila
- Moov vs Trustly
- Moov vs Volt
- Moov vs Basis Theory
- Moov vs TrueLayer
- Moov vs Column
- Moov vs Highnote
- Moov vs Yapily
- Moov vs Synctera
- Moov vs Backbase
- Moov vs Enfuce
- Moov vs Griffin
- Moov vs Lithic
- Moov vs Stoplight
- Moov vs Swan
- Moov vs Mambu
- Moov vs Vodeno
- Moov vs Fintech Farm
- Moov vs Skaleet
- Moov vs Weavr
- Moov vs Temenos Transact
- Moov vs 10x Banking
- Moov vs Unit
- Moov vs i2c
- Moov vs Solaris
- Moov vs Tyk
- Moov vs WSO2 API Manager
- Moov vs Zimpler
- Moov vs 3scale
- Moov vs Aiia
- Tuum vs Dwolla
- Tuum vs Formance
- Tuum vs Increase
- Tuum vs Sila
- Tuum vs Trustly
- Tuum vs Volt
- Tuum vs Basis Theory
- Tuum vs TrueLayer
- Tuum vs Column
- Tuum vs Highnote
- Tuum vs Yapily
- Tuum vs Synctera
- Tuum vs Backbase
- Tuum vs Enfuce
- Tuum vs Griffin
- Tuum vs Lithic
- Tuum vs Stoplight
- Tuum vs Swan
- Tuum vs Mambu
- Tuum vs Vodeno
- Tuum vs Fintech Farm
- Tuum vs Skaleet
- Tuum vs Weavr
- Tuum vs Temenos Transact
- Tuum vs 10x Banking
- Tuum vs Unit
- Tuum vs i2c
- Tuum vs Solaris
- Tuum vs Tyk
- Tuum vs WSO2 API Manager
- Tuum vs Zimpler
- Tuum vs 3scale
- Tuum vs Aiia
