APIs · head to head
Moov vs Ozone API

Moov
APIs
Payments API with a published rate card covering card acceptance, ACH and instant payouts
- From
- $500/month
- Rated
- -

Ozone API
APIs
Standards-compliant open banking API layer for banks and regulators
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Moov the 500 US dollar monthly minimum makes Moov unattractive below roughly 80,000 dollars a month of card volume, since the minimum rather than the rate becomes your effective price.; Ozone API it provides the API layer, not the core connectivity, so the bulk of the project is still integrating your own core banking systems and that cost is not in the licence.
- They diverge on capability: Moov covers Interchange-plus card acceptance, Ozone API covers Multi-standard support.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Moov and Ozone API actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Moov
- Interchange-plus card acceptance
- ACH transfers
- Instant payments
- Wallets
- Payment links and invoices
- Virtual cards
- Account verification
- Card account updater
Only in Ozone API
- Multi-standard support
- Consent management
- Developer portal
- Regulatory reporting
- Premium API monetisation
- Deployment flexibility
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Moov
- A vertical SaaS company embedding payments that needs published unit economics to price its own product before signing anythingnot Ozone API
- A marketplace paying contractors that wants same-day ACH and instant push-to-card in one API with the cost of each visiblenot Ozone API
- A platform that must hold balances for end users between collection and payout without becoming a money transmitternot Ozone API
- A software company moving off a legacy gateway that wants interchange-plus transparency instead of a blended rate that hides interchange increasesnot Ozone API
Ozone API
- A building society facing an open banking compliance deadline with no API team of its ownnot Moov
- A bank operating in several jurisdictions that must satisfy different open banking standards at oncenot Moov
- A regulator or standards body building national open finance infrastructurenot Moov
- A bank wanting to sell premium APIs beyond the regulatory minimum without building entitlement plumbingnot Moov
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Moov
- The 500 US dollar monthly minimum makes Moov unattractive below roughly 80,000 dollars a month of card volume, since the minimum rather than the rate becomes your effective price.
- The 50 cent monthly charge per active wallet penalises platforms with many end users who transact rarely, and that cost grows with your user base rather than your revenue.
- United States only, so any platform with international sellers or buyers needs a second provider and a second reconciliation process.
- At very high volume the published interchange-plus markup is less competitive than a directly negotiated acquiring relationship, so success eventually creates a reason to leave.
- The ecosystem of prebuilt integrations, plugins and third-party tooling is far smaller than Stripe's, so anything outside the core API, from tax handling to subscription logic, is work you build yourself.
Ozone API
- It provides the API layer, not the core connectivity, so the bulk of the project is still integrating your own core banking systems and that cost is not in the licence.
- Value is driven by regulatory obligation, so an institution not under a mandate struggles to build a business case for the spend.
- It is a small UK vendor selling to large regulated institutions, which raises procurement and vendor viability questions during bank due diligence.
- Premium API monetisation is a genuine capability but few banks have found real demand, so revenue projections used to justify the purchase often do not materialise.
- Standards evolve continuously and each revision means a change programme in your own systems, even where Ozone absorbs the specification work at the API edge.
Pricing, plan by plan
Moov
$500/month- Standard$500/month
- 500 USD monthly minimum, no setup fee
- Card online at interchange plus 0.60% and 15c
- Tap to pay at interchange plus 0.50% and 15c
- Custom$undefined/month
- Negotiated rates for high volume
- Specialised business models
- Dedicated support
Ozone API
On request- Ozone API$undefined/year
- Annual licence or managed service subscription, quoted
- Scaling by institution size, standards in scope and API call volume
- Implementation and core integration charged separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Moov if
- You need interchange-plus card acceptance.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android.
- You also want ach transfers.
Choose Ozone API if
- You need multi-standard support.
- You work on Web, REST API, Linux.
- You also want consent management.
Questions people ask
- Is Moov or Ozone API better?
- Neither clearly leads. Moov starts at $500/month and Ozone API at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Moov or Ozone API?
- Moov starts at $500/month and Ozone API at On request.
- Does Moov or Ozone API run on more platforms?
- Moov runs on Web, API, iOS, Android. Ozone API runs on Web, REST API, Linux.
- What is Moov best used for?
- Moov is most often used for a vertical saas company embedding payments that needs published unit economics to price its own product before signing anything, a marketplace paying contractors that wants same-day ach and instant push-to-card in one api with the cost of each visible, a platform that must hold balances for end users between collection and payout without becoming a money transmitter, a software company moving off a legacy gateway that wants interchange-plus transparency instead of a blended rate that hides interchange increases. Of those, a vertical saas company embedding payments that needs published unit economics to price its own product before signing anything and a marketplace paying contractors that wants same-day ach and instant push-to-card in one api with the cost of each visible are not what Ozone API is typically brought in for.
- What can Moov do that Ozone API cannot?
- Moov covers Interchange-plus card acceptance, ACH transfers, Instant payments, Wallets. Ozone API covers Multi-standard support, Consent management, Developer portal, Regulatory reporting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Moov: Does Moov publish its prices?
Yes, in unusual detail: interchange-plus card rates, per-transaction ACH and RTP charges, dispute and return fees, and the monthly minimum are all on the pricing page.
Ozone API: Is this a competitor to Plaid or TrueLayer?
No, the opposite side. Ozone is bought by the bank exposing data; Plaid and TrueLayer consume it on behalf of third parties.
Moov: What is the monthly minimum?
500 US dollars, with no setup fee. Wallet charges and transaction fees count towards it.
Ozone API: Does it connect to my core banking system?
It provides the standards-compliant API surface and adapters, but connecting your core is an integration project you scope separately.
Moov: Can I use Moov outside the United States?
No. Moov handles US payments only, though it accepts international cards at an extra 1.5 percent.
Ozone API: Which standards does it support?
UK Open Banking, Berlin Group, FDX, Consumer Data Right and Gulf regional standards, among others, from one platform.
Moov: Is Moov a bank?
No. It is a payments platform working with partner financial institutions, so account and settlement arrangements depend on those partners.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Moov vs Dwolla
- Moov vs Formance
- Moov vs Increase
- Moov vs Sila
- Moov vs Trustly
- Moov vs Volt
- Moov vs Basis Theory
- Moov vs TrueLayer
- Moov vs Column
- Moov vs Highnote
- Moov vs Yapily
- Moov vs Synctera
- Moov vs Backbase
- Moov vs Enfuce
- Moov vs Griffin
- Moov vs Lithic
- Moov vs Stoplight
- Moov vs Swan
- Moov vs Salt Edge
- Moov vs Enable Banking
- Moov vs Temenos Transact
- Moov vs Tink
- Moov vs MX Technologies
- Moov vs Akoya
- Moov vs Sensedia
- Moov vs Tribe Payments
- Moov vs Bud Financial
- Moov vs Yodlee
- Moov vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Moov vs Thredd
- Moov vs Thunder Client
- Moov vs Toqio
- Moov vs Tyk
- Ozone API vs Dwolla
- Ozone API vs Formance
- Ozone API vs Increase
- Ozone API vs Sila
- Ozone API vs Trustly
- Ozone API vs Volt
- Ozone API vs Basis Theory
- Ozone API vs TrueLayer
- Ozone API vs Column
- Ozone API vs Highnote
- Ozone API vs Yapily
- Ozone API vs Synctera
- Ozone API vs Backbase
- Ozone API vs Enfuce
- Ozone API vs Griffin
- Ozone API vs Lithic
- Ozone API vs Stoplight
- Ozone API vs Swan
- Ozone API vs Salt Edge
- Ozone API vs Enable Banking
- Ozone API vs Temenos Transact
- Ozone API vs Tink
- Ozone API vs MX Technologies
- Ozone API vs Akoya
- Ozone API vs Sensedia
- Ozone API vs Tribe Payments
- Ozone API vs Bud Financial
- Ozone API vs Yodlee
- Ozone API vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Ozone API vs Thredd
- Ozone API vs Thunder Client
- Ozone API vs Toqio
- Ozone API vs Tyk
