Cybersecurity · head to head
Mimecast vs Periscope Holdings

Periscope Holdings
Government
Statewide e-procurement systems and supplier networks for large public agencies
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Mimecast no pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request; Periscope Holdings it is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- They diverge on capability: Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection, Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Mimecast and Periscope Holdings actually diverge.
| Attribute | Mimecast | Periscope Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $4/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Email, Cloud, Collaboration | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | 2003 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Mimecast
- Advanced threat detection
- Secure sharing
- Email encryption
- Message tracking
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- eDiscovery
- Backup and recovery
Only in Periscope Holdings
- Sealed bid solicitation
- Supplier registration network
- Contract catalogues
- Cooperative purchasing
- Spend and compliance reporting
- Supplier diversity tracking
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Mimecast
- Email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacksnot Periscope Holdings
- Email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisationsnot Periscope Holdings
Periscope Holdings
- A state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entitiesnot Mimecast
- A large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening recordnot Mimecast
- A purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entitiesnot Mimecast
- A state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contractsnot Mimecast
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Mimecast
- No pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request
- The platform is split into separately sold products for email security, awareness training, data protection and governance
- Collaboration threat protection, DMARC analysis, incident response and email archiving are all further add ons on top of those
Periscope Holdings
- It is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- The interface reflects the age and regulatory weight of the platform, and suppliers routinely describe registration and bidding as harder than on newer portals, which can suppress bid response.
- Ownership has changed twice since 2021, from independent to mdf commerce to KKR, so roadmap and support continuity should be written into the contract rather than assumed.
- Sibling products inside mdf commerce cover adjacent procurement ground, which means an apparently competitive shortlist may contain two products with the same owner.
- Statewide implementations are multi year projects with heavy configuration and change management, and the professional services cost commonly exceeds the software over the contract term.
Pricing, plan by plan
Mimecast
$4/month- Defender$4/month
- Per user
- Threat protection
- Impersonation prevention
- Archive$3/month
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- Search & recall
- Unified$6/month
- All Defender features
- All Archive features
- Backup
Periscope Holdings
On request- BuySpeed$undefined/year
- Quoted per programme, scaled to entities served and transaction volume
- Multi year statewide contracts with implementation priced separately
- Supplier side registration fees form part of the commercial model on some programmes
Which should you pick?
Choose Mimecast if
- You need advanced threat detection.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Collaboration.
- You also want secure sharing.
Choose Periscope Holdings if
- You need sealed bid solicitation.
- You also want supplier registration network.
Questions people ask
- Is Mimecast or Periscope Holdings better?
- Neither clearly leads. Mimecast starts at $4/month and Periscope Holdings at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Mimecast or Periscope Holdings?
- Mimecast starts at $4/month and Periscope Holdings at On request.
- Does Mimecast or Periscope Holdings run on more platforms?
- Mimecast runs on Email, Cloud, Collaboration. Periscope Holdings runs on Web.
- What is Mimecast best used for?
- Mimecast is most often used for email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacks, email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisations. Of those, email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacks and email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisations are not what Periscope Holdings is typically brought in for.
- What can Mimecast do that Periscope Holdings cannot?
- Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection, Secure sharing, Email encryption, Message tracking. Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation, Supplier registration network, Contract catalogues, Cooperative purchasing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Mimecast: How much does Mimecast cost?
Mimecast does not publish pricing on its website. Customers must request a custom quote by contacting the sales team at +1 617 393 7000 or using the Get a Quote button.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Who owns Periscope Holdings?
mdf commerce acquired it in 2021, and mdf commerce was itself acquired by KKR in 2024.
Mimecast: Is there a free trial of Mimecast?
Mimecast's trial and pricing options are not specified on the public website. Contact sales at +1 617 393 7000 or through their support portal at mimecastsupport.zendesk.com for trial availability.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Is it suitable for a single city?
Usually not. It is built and priced for statewide or very large agency programmes.
Periscope Holdings: What is BuySpeed?
The e-procurement platform behind its statewide deployments, covering solicitation through catalogue ordering and reporting.
Periscope Holdings: Can we see what a state paid?
Yes. State procurement awards are public records and typically disclose the full multi year contract value.
Related pages
More on Periscope Holdings
Other head to heads
- Mimecast vs Norton 360
- Mimecast vs 1Password
- Mimecast vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Mimecast vs LastPass
- Mimecast vs Proofpoint
- Mimecast vs Nessus
- Mimecast vs Qualys VMDR
- Mimecast vs Doppler
- Mimecast vs Chainguard
- Mimecast vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Mimecast vs Netwrix
- Mimecast vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Mimecast vs Transmit Security
- Mimecast vs TrustArc
- Mimecast vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Mimecast vs VMware Carbon Black
- Mimecast vs Wireshark
- Mimecast vs WorkOS
- Mimecast vs Euna Solutions
- Mimecast vs Bidnet Direct
- Mimecast vs OpenGov
- Mimecast vs Bonfire
- Mimecast vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Mimecast vs NEOGOV
- Mimecast vs ArchiveSocial
- Mimecast vs Clariti
- Mimecast vs GovPilot
- Mimecast vs mySidewalk
- Mimecast vs SAP for Government
- Mimecast vs Axon Records
- Mimecast vs CitizenLab
- Mimecast vs ClearGov
- Mimecast vs eCode360
- Mimecast vs MyRec.com
- Mimecast vs DemandStar
- Periscope Holdings vs Norton 360
- Periscope Holdings vs 1Password
- Periscope Holdings vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Periscope Holdings vs LastPass
- Periscope Holdings vs Proofpoint
- Periscope Holdings vs Nessus
- Periscope Holdings vs Qualys VMDR
- Periscope Holdings vs Doppler
- Periscope Holdings vs Chainguard
- Periscope Holdings vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Periscope Holdings vs Netwrix
- Periscope Holdings vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Periscope Holdings vs Transmit Security
- Periscope Holdings vs TrustArc
- Periscope Holdings vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Periscope Holdings vs VMware Carbon Black
- Periscope Holdings vs Wireshark
- Periscope Holdings vs WorkOS
- Periscope Holdings vs Euna Solutions
- Periscope Holdings vs Bidnet Direct
- Periscope Holdings vs OpenGov
- Periscope Holdings vs Bonfire
- Periscope Holdings vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Periscope Holdings vs NEOGOV
- Periscope Holdings vs ArchiveSocial
- Periscope Holdings vs Clariti
- Periscope Holdings vs GovPilot
- Periscope Holdings vs mySidewalk
- Periscope Holdings vs SAP for Government
- Periscope Holdings vs Axon Records
- Periscope Holdings vs CitizenLab
- Periscope Holdings vs ClearGov
- Periscope Holdings vs eCode360
- Periscope Holdings vs MyRec.com
- Periscope Holdings vs DemandStar

