ERP · head to head
Metasfresh vs Seeq

Metasfresh
ERP
Open-source ERP for mid-sized wholesale and manufacturing
- From
- €99/month
- Rated
- -

Seeq
Manufacturing
Self-service analytics for process manufacturing time-series data sitting on top of existing historians
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Metasfresh cloud hosting is charged separately from user licences at EUR 299 per month on monthly billing or EUR 249 per month on annual billing; Seeq named-user pricing suits a small core team but scales badly: a site wanting a hundred engineers with occasional access pays for a hundred licences that mostly sit idle, which is why deployments often stay artificially narrow.
- They diverge on capability: Metasfresh covers Supply chain, Seeq covers Query in place.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Metasfresh and Seeq actually diverge.
| Attribute | Metasfresh | Seeq |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | €99/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Self-hosted, Cloud, Web | Web, Cloud, On-premise, Windows, Linux |
| Category | ERP | Manufacturing |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Metasfresh
- Supply chain
- Inventory
- Manufacturing
- Purchasing
- Accounting
- Wholesale management
- Custom modules
- EDI systems
Only in Seeq
- Query in place
- Capsules
- Asset trees
- Seeq Data Lab
- Organizer
- Multi-source joins
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Metasfresh
- Open source ERP for procurement, sales, warehouse and accountingnot Seeq
- Hosting an ERP in a German data centre on a dedicated servernot Seeq
- Self hosting an ERP where the source code must be inspectablenot Seeq
Seeq
- A pharmaceutical plant comparing hundreds of batches against a golden batch profile without exporting historian data into spreadsheetsnot Metasfresh
- A reliability engineer investigating why a compressor trips, needing to overlay vibration, process and maintenance data across two years of historynot Metasfresh
- Refinery process engineers building a recurring shift report that pulls live values rather than being rebuilt by hand each weeknot Metasfresh
- A site whose data lake project has stalled and that needs engineers analysing plant history now, without waiting for an ingestion pipelinenot Metasfresh
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Metasfresh
- Cloud hosting is charged separately from user licences at EUR 299 per month on monthly billing or EUR 249 per month on annual billing
- The EUR 79 per user per month annual rate requires minimum user quantities that depend on company size; monthly billing costs EUR 99 per user per month
- The mandatory starter package covering setup, customisation, project management and training is priced individually on request
- Standard support is email only during business hours; a 24/7 SLA is a separate contract on request
- All published prices exclude VAT
- Projects larger than the L size starter package require an individual quote
Seeq
- Named-user pricing suits a small core team but scales badly: a site wanting a hundred engineers with occasional access pays for a hundred licences that mostly sit idle, which is why deployments often stay artificially narrow.
- Seeq inherits whatever quality exists in the historian, so plants with unstructured tag names and no asset model spend real effort building asset trees in Seeq that should have been fixed upstream.
- Certain historian connectors are charged separately, so the licence quote and the actual cost of connecting your specific data sources are two different numbers.
- It is analysis, not control or action; findings still have to be carried into a CMMS or a control change by hand, so value depends on a workflow Seeq does not provide.
- The product assumes competent process engineers. Organisations without that skill in-house get little from it, because Seeq deliberately does not ship prebuilt failure models the way condition monitoring vendors do.
Pricing, plan by plan
Metasfresh
€99/month- Starter Package$null/custom
- Initial system setup
- Customization of windows and documents
- Project management
- User Fee$99/month
- Monthly billing
- Access to all developments
- Support and integration
- User Fee (annual)$79/month
- Annual billing minimum
- Access to all developments
- Support and integration
- Cloud Hosting$299/month
- Monthly billing
- Secure data transfer
- Real-time backup
Seeq
On request- Seeq$undefined/year
- Licensed per named user, not per tag
- Separate charges for certain historian connectors
- Cloud-hosted and self-hosted deployments quoted differently
Which should you pick?
Choose Metasfresh if
- You need supply chain.
- You work on Self-hosted, Cloud, Web.
- You also want inventory.
Choose Seeq if
- You need query in place.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise, Windows, Linux.
- You also want capsules.
Questions people ask
- Is Metasfresh or Seeq better?
- Neither clearly leads. Metasfresh starts at €99/month and Seeq at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Metasfresh or Seeq?
- Metasfresh starts at €99/month and Seeq at On request.
- Does Metasfresh or Seeq run on more platforms?
- Metasfresh runs on Self-hosted, Cloud, Web. Seeq runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise, Windows, Linux.
- What is Metasfresh best used for?
- Metasfresh is most often used for open source erp for procurement, sales, warehouse and accounting, hosting an erp in a german data centre on a dedicated server, self hosting an erp where the source code must be inspectable. Of those, open source erp for procurement, sales, warehouse and accounting and hosting an erp in a german data centre on a dedicated server are not what Seeq is typically brought in for.
- What can Metasfresh do that Seeq cannot?
- Metasfresh covers Supply chain, Inventory, Manufacturing, Purchasing. Seeq covers Query in place, Capsules, Asset trees, Seeq Data Lab.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Metasfresh: What is metasfresh's monthly user fee?
metasfresh charges per-user monthly fees starting at 99 euros per user with monthly billing or 79 euros per user with annual billing (minimum user quantity required based on company size). This includes access to all ERP developments, support, integration, and custom configuration.
SourceSeeq: Does Seeq store my data?
No. It queries connected historians and databases in place. Removing Seeq leaves your data exactly where it was.
Metasfresh: How much does metasfresh cloud hosting cost?
metasfresh Cloud Hosting costs 299 euros per month with monthly billing or 249 euros per month with annual billing. This includes secure data transfer, real-time backup, dedicated German server infrastructure, and comprehensive support.
SourceSeeq: Who owns Seeq?
It is an independent private company in Seattle, most recently funded by a 2024 growth round led by Sixth Street. It has not been taken over by a private equity buyer.
Metasfresh: Is there a one-time setup fee for metasfresh?
Yes, metasfresh includes a Starter Package with one-time costs for initial system setup, customization, project management, and multiplier training with online meeting room access. Exact pricing is available upon request based on company size and requirements.
SourceSeeq: How is it licensed?
Per named user, with some historian connectors charged separately. Nothing is published; every number comes from a quote.
Seeq: Do I need a data scientist?
No, and that is the point. Workbench is aimed at process engineers. Data Lab exists for the minority who want Python.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Metasfresh vs DEAR Systems
- Metasfresh vs ADempiere
- Metasfresh vs iDempiere
- Metasfresh vs Tryton
- Metasfresh vs Fishbowl
- Metasfresh vs Dolibarr
- Metasfresh vs Infor CloudSuite
- Metasfresh vs MRPeasy
- Metasfresh vs Visibility
- Metasfresh vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- Metasfresh vs Odoo
- Metasfresh vs Epicor
- Metasfresh vs Cin7
- Metasfresh vs Deltek
- Metasfresh vs IFS Cloud
- Metasfresh vs IQMS
- Metasfresh vs Omnea
- Metasfresh vs QAD
- Metasfresh vs Sight Machine
- Metasfresh vs TrendMiner
- Metasfresh vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Metasfresh vs eMaint
- Metasfresh vs AVEVA System Platform
- Metasfresh vs SolidWorks
- Metasfresh vs Erbessd Instruments
- Metasfresh vs Flow Software
- Metasfresh vs Oden Technologies
- Metasfresh vs OpenBOM
- Metasfresh vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Metasfresh vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Metasfresh vs MOVUS
- Metasfresh vs Oqton
- Metasfresh vs Paperless Parts
- Metasfresh vs Petasense
- Seeq vs DEAR Systems
- Seeq vs ADempiere
- Seeq vs iDempiere
- Seeq vs Tryton
- Seeq vs Fishbowl
- Seeq vs Dolibarr
- Seeq vs Infor CloudSuite
- Seeq vs MRPeasy
- Seeq vs Visibility
- Seeq vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- Seeq vs Odoo
- Seeq vs Epicor
- Seeq vs Cin7
- Seeq vs Deltek
- Seeq vs IFS Cloud
- Seeq vs IQMS
- Seeq vs Omnea
- Seeq vs QAD
- Seeq vs Sight Machine
- Seeq vs TrendMiner
- Seeq vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Seeq vs eMaint
- Seeq vs AVEVA System Platform
- Seeq vs SolidWorks
- Seeq vs Erbessd Instruments
- Seeq vs Flow Software
- Seeq vs Oden Technologies
- Seeq vs OpenBOM
- Seeq vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Seeq vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Seeq vs MOVUS
- Seeq vs Oqton
- Seeq vs Paperless Parts
- Seeq vs Petasense
